31.10.2013 Views

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

288 A <strong>HISTORY</strong> <strong>OF</strong> MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS<br />

nelle;l there the symbol H stands for complete logical disjunction,<br />

X for logical product, I for "identity," C for "contains," and 0 for<br />

"is contained in."<br />

675. Signs <strong>of</strong> Bolyai.-Wolfgang Bolyai used logical symbols in<br />

his mathematical treatise, the Tentamen,2 which were new in mathematical<br />

works <strong>of</strong> that time. Thus A =.B signified A absolutely equal<br />

to B; A~ signified A equal to B with respect to content; A(=B or<br />

B=)A signified that each value <strong>of</strong> A is equal to some value <strong>of</strong> B;<br />

A (=)B signified that each value <strong>of</strong> A is equal to some value <strong>of</strong> B,<br />

and vice versa.<br />

676. Signs <strong>of</strong> Bentham.-The earlier studies <strong>of</strong> logic in England<br />

hardly belong to symbolic logic. George Bentham! in 1827 introduces<br />

a few symbols. He lets = stand for identity, II for diversity, t for<br />

in toto (i.e., universality), p for "partiality." Accordingly, "tX = tY"<br />

means X in toto=Y in toto; "tX=pY" means X in toto=Y ex parte;<br />

rin toto<br />

"tX II ~Y" means X in toto II Y i or •<br />

l ex parte<br />

677. Signs <strong>of</strong> A. de Morgan.-The earliest important research in<br />

symbolic logic in Great Britain is that <strong>of</strong> De Morqom:" He had not<br />

seen the publications <strong>of</strong>Lambert, nor the paper <strong>of</strong> J. D. Gergonne.!<br />

when his paper <strong>of</strong> 1846 was published. In 1831 De Morgan" used<br />

squares, circles, and triangles to represent terms. He does this also<br />

in his Formal Logic 7 but in 1831 he did not knows that Euler" had<br />

1 J. D. Gergonne in Annales de matMmatiques pures et appliquees, Vol. VII<br />

(Nismes, 1816-17), p. 189-228. Our information is drawn from G. Vacca's<br />

article in Revue de mathematiques, Vol. VI (Turin, 1896-99), p, 184.<br />

2 Wolfgangi Bolyai de Bolya, Tentamen • . . • in elementa matheseos (2d ed.),<br />

Vol. I (Budapest, 1897), p. xi.<br />

S George Bentham, Outline <strong>of</strong> a New System <strong>of</strong> Logic (London, 1827), p. 133.<br />

• Augustus de Morgan, Formal Logic (London, 1847); five papers in the<br />

Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. VIII (1846), p. 379-408;<br />

Vol. IX (1850), p. 79-127; Vol. X (1858), p. 173-230; Vol. X (1860), p, 331-58;<br />

Vol. X (1863), p. 428-87.<br />

a J. D. Gergonne, "Essai de dialectique rationelle," Annales de matMmatique.<br />

(Nismes, 1816, 1817).<br />

e De Morgan, "The Study and Difficulties <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong>," Library <strong>of</strong> UsefUl<br />

KnowWge (1831), p. 71-73.<br />

7 De Morgan, Formal Logic (1847), p. 8, 9.<br />

8 Ibid., p, 323, 324.<br />

8 L. Euler, Leure« d une Prince88e d' AUemag716 sur quelques sujetsde Physique<br />

et de Philosophie (Petersburg, 1768-72), Lettre CV.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!