31.10.2013 Views

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

270 A <strong>HISTORY</strong> <strong>OF</strong> MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS<br />

tp, and took' 4> as a function tp, z, y, z, .... In 1772 Lagrange- took u<br />

as a function <strong>of</strong> z. Another time he 3 wrote Clairaut's equation, y-px<br />

+f(p) = 0, "f(P) denotant une fonction quelconque de p seul," and<br />

he gave f'(p) = d~~) . A curious symbol, (J)x, for our f(x) was used by<br />

W. Bolyai.!<br />

645. During the early part <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century functional<br />

notations found their way into elementary textbooks; for instance,<br />

into Legendre's Elements <strong>of</strong> Geometry,5 where a function <strong>of</strong> p and q<br />

was marked 4>: (p, q).<br />

J. F. W. Herschel 6 uses the signf(x) and says, "In generalf(f(x))<br />

orffx maybe writtenj2(x) .... andf1l'fn(x) =f"'+n(x) , .... andf-l(x)<br />

must denote that quantity whose function f is z."<br />

646. G. Peano! writes Y=f(x) and x =!(Y) , where Jmeans the inverse<br />

function <strong>of</strong> f. This notation is free from the objection raised<br />

to that <strong>of</strong> Herschel and Burmann (§533, 645), and to gd-lcJ>, used as<br />

the inverse Gudermannian by. some writers, for instance, by J. M.<br />

Peirce in his Mathematical Tables (1881, p. 42) and D. A. Murray in<br />

his Differential and Integral Calculus (1908, p. 422), but by others<br />

more appropriately marked },,(cJ».<br />

B. SYMBOLS FOR SOME SPECIAL FUNCTIONS<br />

647. Symmetric functions.-Attention was directed in § 558 to<br />

Leibniz' dot notation for symmetric functions. Many writers used no<br />

special symbol for symmetric functions; the elementary functions<br />

were placed equal to the respective coefficients <strong>of</strong> the given equation,<br />

due attention being paid to algebraic signs. This course was followed<br />

I Loc. cit.; (Euvres, Vol. II (Paris, 1868), p. 40.<br />

2 N. Memoires d. l'acad. r. d. scienc. et bell.-Iett. de Berlin, annee 1772; (Euvres,<br />

Vol. III (Paris, 1869), p. 442.<br />

8 N. Memoires d. l'acad. r. d. scienc. et bell.-lett. de Berlin, annee 1774; (Euore«,<br />

Vol. IV (Paris. 1869), p. 30. See also p. 591.<br />

• Wolfgang Bolyai, Az arithmetioo eleje (Maras.Vasirhelyt, 1830). See B. Boncompagni,<br />

Bullettino, Vol. I (1868), p. 287.<br />

• A. M. Legendre, :2Lements de geometrie (ed, par J. B. Balleroy ... avec notes<br />

... par M. A. L. Marchand; Bruxelles, 1845), p. 188.<br />

a J. F. W. Herschel, Calculus <strong>of</strong> Finite Differences (Cambridge, 1820), p. 5.<br />

Herschel says that he first explained his notation for inverse functions in the Philosophical<br />

Transactions <strong>of</strong> London in 1813 in his paper "On a Remarkable Application<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cotes's Theorem," but that he was anticipated in this notation by Burmann.<br />

7 G. Peano, Lezioni di analiBi injinitesimale, Vol. I (Torino. 1893), p. 8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!