31.10.2013 Views

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TRIGONOMETRY 177<br />

for the calculus, inasmuch as, analogous to the usual forms <strong>of</strong> algebra,<br />

1 1<br />

there follows from T y = x immediately y = Tgx; from C z= u,<br />

g ~<br />

immediately z = Cos u; etc. "I<br />

535. Persistence <strong>of</strong> rival notations for inverse funclions.--The<br />

eighteenth-century notations, involving the word "arc" or its equivalent,<br />

were only mild contractions <strong>of</strong> the words which defined the meanings<br />

to be conveyed to the reader, and they maintained their place in<br />

most works <strong>of</strong> Continental Europe during the nineteenth century. C.<br />

Gudermannt in 1829 used the notation "arc (tang=z)," etc. In France,<br />

J. Houel employed the easier form "arcsin." The only marked inroad <strong>of</strong><br />

Herschel's notation upon the Continent is found with G. Peano who in<br />

1893 3 adopts the Eulerian cos x, for arc cos x, and later' writes sin-I,<br />

COS-I, tang-I.<br />

In Mexico the continental and English notations clashed. F. D.<br />

Covarrubias- writes "arco (sec=x)" and lets cos-I x stand for _1_.<br />

cos x<br />

On the other hand, Manuel Torres Torija" uses "x=tan- I y" and<br />

says that it means the same as "x=arc (tan=y)."<br />

In England, Herschel's notation gained ground rapidly, but not<br />

instantaneously. We find, for instance, in 1838, "arc (tan. ~)" in a<br />

treatise by John. West.'<br />

In the United States the British influence greatly predominated<br />

during the nineteenth century. A rare exception is the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

the continental symbols "arc tan," "arc esc," in a book <strong>of</strong> E. P.<br />

Seaver." The use <strong>of</strong> Herschel's notation underwent a slight change in<br />

I M. Ohm, System der Mathematik, Vol. II (Berlin, 1829), p. 372.<br />

'C. Gudermann, Journal fur r. u. a. Mathematik, Vol. IV (1829), p.<br />

287.<br />

a G. Peano, Lezioni di analisi injinite8'lmale, Vol. I (Turin, 1893), p. 43.<br />

~ G. Peano, Formulaire matMmatique, Edition de l'an 1902-'03 (Turin, 1903),<br />

p. 228, 229.<br />

& F. D. Covarrubias, Elementos de analisis trascendente 6 cd.Iculo injinitessimal<br />

(2d ed.; Mexico, 1890), p. 48, 49.<br />

• Manuel Torres Torija, Neeiones de Algebra Superior y elementosfundamentalea<br />

de cdlculo dijflJT'encial eintegral (Mexico, 1894), p. 181.<br />

7 Rev. John West, Mathematical Treatises (ed. John Leslie; Edinburgh, 1838),<br />

p.237.<br />

• Edwin P. Seaver, Formulas <strong>of</strong> Plane and Spherical Trigonometry (Boston<br />

and Cambridge, 1871), p. 43.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!