31.10.2013 Views

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

280 A <strong>HISTORY</strong> <strong>OF</strong> MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS<br />

writers using these two symbols are Senillosa,' Izquierdo,' LiBvano,J<br />

and Porfirio da Motta Pegado." In German publications i for arithmetical<br />

progression and for geometric progression occur less fre-<br />

quently than among the French. In the 1710 publication in the Miscellanea<br />

Berolinensia6 + is mentioned in a discourse on symbols<br />

(5 198). The G was used in 1716 by Emanuel Swedenborg.6<br />

Emerson7 designated harmonic progression by the symbol - and<br />

harmonic proportion by :. .<br />

249. Arithmetical proportion finds crude symbolic representation<br />

in the Arithmetic <strong>of</strong> Boethius as printed at Augsburg in 1488 (see<br />

Figure 103). Being, in importance, subordinate to geometrical proportion,<br />

the need <strong>of</strong> a symbolism was less apparent. But in the seventeenth<br />

century definite notations came into vogue. William Oughtred<br />

appears to have designed a symbolism. Oughtred's language (Clawis<br />

[1652], p. 21) is "Ut 7.4: 12.9 vel 7.7-3: 12.12-3. Arithmetic&<br />

proportionales sunt." As later in his work he does not use arithmetical<br />

proportion in symbolic analysis, it is not easy to decide whether the<br />

symbols just quoted were intended by Oughtred as part <strong>of</strong> his algebraic<br />

symbolism or merely as punctuation marks in ordinary writing.<br />

John Newtons says: "As 8,5:6,3. Here 8 exceeds 5, as much as 6<br />

exceeds 3."<br />

Wallisg says: "Et pariter 5,3; 11,9; 17,15; 19,17. sunt in eadem<br />

progressione arithmetica." In P. Chelucci's'o Inslituliones analyticae,<br />

arithmetical proportion is indicated thus : 6.8 ': 10.12. Oughtred's<br />

notation is followed in the article "Caract6re" <strong>of</strong> the Encyclopddie<br />

Felipe Senillosa, Tratado elemental de Arismetica (Neuva ed.; Buenos Aires,<br />

1844), p. 46.<br />

Gabriel Izquierdo, Tratado de Aritdica (Santiago [Chile], 1859), p. 167.<br />

Indalecio LiBvano, Tratado de Aritmetica (2. Bd.; Bogota, 1872), p. 147.<br />

Luiz Porlirio da Motta Pegado, Tratade elementar de arithmetica (2. Bd.;<br />

Lisboa, 1875), p. 253.<br />

j Miscellanea Berolineda (Berolini, 1710), p. 159.<br />

6Emanuel Swedberg, Daedalus hyperboreus (Upsala, 1716), p. 126. Facsimile<br />

reproduction in Kungliga Veten-skaps Soeieteten-s i Upsala Tviihundraiirsminne<br />

(Upsala, 1910).<br />

' W. Emerson, Doctrine <strong>of</strong> Proportion (London, 1763), p. 2.<br />

John Newton, Znstitutw d h i c a or mathematical Institution (London,<br />

1654), p. 125.<br />

0 John Wallis, op. cit. (Oxford, 1657), p. 229.<br />

lo Paolino Chelucci, Znstitutiunes analyticoe (editio post tertiam Romanam<br />

prima in Germania; Vienna, 1761), p. 3. See also the first edition (Rome, 1738),<br />

p. 1-15.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!