31.10.2013 Views

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

P. HISTORY OF ' AATHEMATICAL - School of Mathematics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INDMDUAL WRITERS 185<br />

All terms being multiplied by g, and properly ordered, one obtains<br />

y6+2Z3y3=B6. As this equation is quadratic with a positive affected<br />

term, it has also a cube root. Thus the required reduction is effected.<br />

"Conclusion: If thereforc 23+3B2x = 2Z3, and dB6+Z8- Z3 = 09,<br />

then - B1-D2 is x, as required."<br />

D<br />

The value <strong>of</strong> x in x3+3B22=2Z3 is -written on page 150 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

1646 edition thus:<br />

" ~C.I/B plano-plano-plani+ Z solido-solido+ Z solido -<br />

~C.I/B plano-plano-plani+Z solido-solido. -Z solido ."<br />

The combining <strong>of</strong> vinculum and radical sign shown here indicates<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> Descartes upon Van Schooten, the editor <strong>of</strong> Vieta's<br />

collected works. As regards Vieta's own notations, it is evident that<br />

compactness was not secured by him to the same degree as by earlier<br />

writers. For powers he did not adopt either the Italian symbolism <strong>of</strong><br />

Pacioli, Tartaglia, and Cardan or the German symbolism <strong>of</strong> Rudolff<br />

and Stifel. It must be emphasized that the radical sign, as found in<br />

the 1646 edition <strong>of</strong> his works, is a modification introduced by Van<br />

Schooten. Vieta himself rejected the radical sign and used, instead,<br />

the letter 1 (latus, "the side <strong>of</strong> a square") or the word radix. The I<br />

had been introduced by Ka~nus ($322); in the Zeteticorum, etc., <strong>of</strong><br />

1593 Vieta wrote 1. 121 for 1/121. In the 1646 edition (p. 400) one<br />

finds 42+42+/2+1/2, which is Van Schooten's revision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

text <strong>of</strong> Vieta: Vieta's own symbolism for this expression was, in 1593,l<br />

"Radix binomiae 2<br />

and in 1595:<br />

+Radix binomiae<br />

" R. bin. 2+R. bin. 2+R. bin. 2+R. 2. ,"<br />

a notation employed also by his contemporary Adrian Van Roomen.<br />

178. Vieta distinguished between number and magnitude even in<br />

his notation. In numerical equations the unknown number is no longer<br />

represented by a vowel; the unknown number and its powers are represented,<br />

respectively, by N (numerus), Q (quadratus), C (cubus), and<br />

Variorum de rebus muthem. Responsorum liber VZZZ (Tours, 1593), corollary<br />

to Caput XVIII, p. 120'. This and the next reference are taken from Tropfke,<br />

op. cit., Vol. I1 (1921), p. 152, 153.<br />

2 Ad Problaa p d omnibus mathematicis lolius orbis conslruadum proposuit<br />

Adtianus Romanus, Franeisci Vielae responmm (Paris, 1595), BI. A IT.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!