27.10.2013 Views

Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries

Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries

Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CAWTHRON INSTITUTE | REPORT NO. 2167 MAY 2012<br />

Mussel shell drop-<strong>of</strong>f is commonly used an indicator <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> benthic effects<br />

beneath mussel farms (Wong & O’Shea 2011), and video transects were used to<br />

determine the limits <strong>of</strong> mussel shell drop-<strong>of</strong>f and/or mussel clumps on the seabed<br />

around the block <strong>of</strong> farms. Li 373 is situated adjacent to Li 396 and Li 361 and the<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> mussel shell drop-<strong>of</strong>f was determined around the entire block <strong>of</strong> farms. An<br />

underwater video camera and light was attached to a sled and tethered via cables to a<br />

VCR and television on the boat. Six transects (Figure 2) were undertaken by lowering<br />

the sled and camera to the seabed and towing it in the required direction. GPS<br />

positions were recorded for each transect with observations <strong>of</strong> conspicuous epifauna<br />

and substratum type.<br />

A single grab sample was collected from t outside the southwest corner <strong>of</strong> the farm<br />

using a 0.01 m 2 van Veen grab sampler. A 63 mm diameter core sub-sample was<br />

photographed and the top 25 mm was collected for analyses <strong>of</strong> sediment grain size.<br />

Grain size was determined gravimetrically after separation <strong>of</strong> fractions by wet sieving<br />

and drying at 105°C, for gravel (≥ 2 mm), sand (≥ 63 μm - < 2 mm) and silt/clay (< 63<br />

μm) size classes.<br />

Depth pr<strong>of</strong>iling was undertaken to assist in characterising the seabed. Continuous<br />

depth readings from a Garmin F100 depth sounder within and adjacent to the farm<br />

areas, and were sent to a PC via a RS232 serial output. The PC simultaneously<br />

collected separate RS232 serial output <strong>of</strong> latitude and longitude from a GPS, and both<br />

data streams were incorporated using communications s<strong>of</strong>tware. Depths were<br />

standardised to chart datum and plotted as depth contours in ArcMap.<br />

1.3. Benthic assessment results<br />

Video transects along the perimeter <strong>of</strong> the farm revealed mussel clumps, mussel shell<br />

drop-<strong>of</strong>f and a fine covering <strong>of</strong> shell hash overlying mud (e.g. Appendix photographs 1<br />

and 7). A patchy film <strong>of</strong> orange/brown benthic diatoms was present in some mud<br />

areas (Appendix photograph 2). Conspicuous epifauna included cushion stars<br />

(Patiriella sp.), ascidians (Styela clava), eleven-armed sea stars (Coscinasterias<br />

muricata), sea cucumbers and small feather hydroids. Two horse mussels (Atrina<br />

zelandica) were observed along the inshore transect. Burrows in the mud were<br />

common, suggesting that regular bioturbation occurs over the site.<br />

Other transects around this block <strong>of</strong> farms have shown a similar environment <strong>of</strong><br />

mussel clumps and shell drop-<strong>of</strong>f on mud (e.g. Appendix photographs 9 and 11);<br />

therefore, it is likely that this habitat is widespread beneath the farm. Mussel clumps<br />

and shell drop-<strong>of</strong>f became less dense with distance from the farm. Beyond the mussel<br />

clump/shell drop-<strong>of</strong>f areas (> 50-115 m north and south <strong>of</strong> the farm; > 20 m inshore <strong>of</strong><br />

the farm) the substratum was mud, <strong>of</strong>ten covered with shell hash, with few epifauna<br />

present (Appendix photographs 2 and 6).<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!