Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries
Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries
Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10<br />
4.5.8 The capacity <strong>of</strong> the wharf to accommodate the proposed increase in product from<br />
the extension to the existing farm (and cumulatively from other extensions in the<br />
area being applied for), is assessed as being adequate. Existing industry operators<br />
currently manage the use <strong>of</strong> the facility in accordance with the operational<br />
management plan 2 (which addresses issues such as traffic control, loading and<br />
carpark manoeuvring and locations and storage <strong>of</strong> equipment). This assessment<br />
is based on the current tonnage crossing the wharf being estimated at<br />
approximately 25,000 tonnes 3 and an expectation that the wharf can adequately<br />
accommodate at least 35,000 tonnes 4 . Notwithstanding the recently approved<br />
quantities anticipated from Wilsons Bay Area B developments, it is considered<br />
that there is currently sufficient capacity to accommodate the cumulative product<br />
from the anticipated farm extensions. It is anticipated that any effects resulting<br />
from more tonnage from the proposed one hectare extension will be no more<br />
than minor over and above the existing tonnage.<br />
4.5.9 There would be no additional traffic associated with the loading/ unloading<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> vessels and trucks servicing the area <strong>of</strong> the farm extension, as the<br />
applicant would be utilising existing vessels/ trucks and other services, as<br />
currently used to service the existing farm. Therefore, residents close to the<br />
wharf and visitors to it will not be adversely affected by the activities associated<br />
with the proposed one hectare extension. It is noted that the traffic and wharf<br />
activities that were anticipated by the Area B applications were <strong>of</strong> no concern to<br />
NZ Transport Authority nor to Thames Coromandel District Council. It is therefore<br />
concluded that the effects from the 1 hectare extension being applied for would<br />
also be acceptable to both organisations.<br />
4.5.10 The applicant therefore considers that the existing facilities are available to and<br />
can adequately be used for servicing the one hectare marine farm extension,<br />
given that the applicant is an existing operator and will be utilising existing vessels<br />
and existing trucks, and there is an existing wharf management protocol in place.<br />
4.5.11 The applicant notes that the Hauraki-Coromandel Development Group and<br />
Thames Coromandel District Council is currently working on future wharfing<br />
infrastructure requirements to support the Coromandel aquaculture industry.<br />
Likewise Waikato Regional Council aims to address this matter in accordance with<br />
its Regional Land Transport Strategy 2011 - 2041, along with policy work relating<br />
to aquaculture growth in the region. It is clear that a strategic approach to<br />
planning for aquaculture infrastructure (as anticipated by the above work) is<br />
taking place and should occur independently <strong>of</strong> this application.<br />
2 Te Kouma Sugar Loaf Landing Facility Coromandel Harbour: Operational Management Plan 1993 & draft 2011<br />
3 Dunbar-Smith, B., for the Hauraki Coromandel Development Group, 2010.Wharfing Infrastructure Discussion Document, p18<br />
4 Ibid, pp 6, 24<br />
10