Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries
Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries
Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CAWTHRON INSTITUTE | REPORT NO. 2134 MAY 2012<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
In August 2011, a collective <strong>of</strong> inshore mussel farmers from Coromandel approached<br />
Cawthron Institute (Cawthron) to provide baseline benthic assessments <strong>of</strong> effects as a part <strong>of</strong><br />
their applications for 1 ha extensions to 32 mussel farms. These ‘baseline’ assessments and<br />
their structure are detailed in the Waikato Regional Council (WRC) Draft Coastal Plan.<br />
To fulfil the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Coastal Plan, a wider-scale assessment programme was<br />
agreed upon by WRC, Cawthron and the collective <strong>of</strong> farmers, whereby eight representative<br />
‘reference’ farms were selected for full benthic and water column assessments to provide an<br />
indication <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> mussel farms, and six ‘control’ sites were selected to provide a<br />
‘baseline’ or ‘background’ assessment <strong>of</strong> the unfarmed benthic and water column<br />
environments. Fieldwork was carried out between 12-16 December 2011.<br />
The seabed beneath and adjacent to the six control and eight reference farm sites was<br />
characterised and mapped using a range <strong>of</strong> sampling techniques including depth pr<strong>of</strong>iling,<br />
sediment grab sampling and video transects. Sediments were tested for total nitrogen (TN),<br />
total organic carbon (TOC), particle grain-size and infauna (richness, abundance and<br />
diversity). At all 32 mussel farm sites, sufficient sampling was undertaken to delineate the<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> mussel clumps around farm areas (see Appendix 7-39).<br />
No clear patterns in sediment particle grain-size components relating to area (north or south<br />
<strong>of</strong> Coromandel Harbour) or site type (’control’ versus ‘farm’) were evident (see Section 5.1).<br />
At the majority <strong>of</strong> sites sediments were dominated (> 50%) by fine muddy silts (< 64 μm).<br />
Sediment cores at the majority <strong>of</strong> sites were characterised by a fairly uniform light grey/brown<br />
colour and appeared well oxygenated, with no evidence <strong>of</strong> an apparent Redox Potential<br />
Discontinuity (aRPD) layer or sulphide odours.<br />
Total nitrogen was significantly higher in sediments collected from under the reference farms<br />
than at control sites (see Section 5.1). In general, lower average TN was found at sites<br />
where sediments had a greater sand component.<br />
Sediment organic content (total organic carbon, TOC) at the reference farms and control<br />
sites was different in the two different areas (north or south <strong>of</strong> Coromandel Harbour) (see<br />
Section 5.1). Farm sites to the north, generally had greater TOC than those to the south <strong>of</strong><br />
Coromandel Harbour, while control sites had similar TOC regardless <strong>of</strong> which area they were<br />
in. Overall, TOC was greatest in sediments that contained the most gravel - sized particles,<br />
and lowest at sites with sediments that had a greater sand component.<br />
Dominant infauna taxa across all sites were the window shell (Theora lubrica), various<br />
species <strong>of</strong> polychaetes (e.g. Heteromastus filiformis, Prionospio multicristata, Prionospio<br />
yuriel and Sphaerosyllis sp.), brittle stars, and oligochaete worms (Section 5.2). The<br />
dominant epifauna taxa by abundance were Phoxocephalidae amphipods, Decapoda larvae<br />
(unidentified) and Melitidae amphipods.<br />
iii