Unit - State of California

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Comparison of March Air Reserve Base and Hemet-Ryan Airbase, CDF Sacramento Issue Pilot and Aircraft Safety Issues March Hemet-Ryan Current Runway length 13,300 feet 4,315 feet Class D controlled airspace Yes No Have staffed control tower Yes No Fully staffed Level A on site fire crash unit Yes No Percent time under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Equal in 2004 Equal in 2004 Special Visual Flight Rules available Yes No Runway width minimum of 100’ Yes Yes Runway suitable for S2T with safety Yes No, only design over-run distance - 5,000’ drawing done Runway suitable for all current Federal Yes No air tankers - 6,000’ Runway suitable for jet based fire fighting aircraft - possibly greater than 6,000’ Yes No Own land for 5,000’ runway Yes Yes Own land for 6,000’ runway Yes Yes Taxi ways capable of supporting single Yes Yes tire 60,000 lbs. and dual 130,000 lbs. Probability of 2-3 minute delay due turbulence from non CDF large planes Co-located with current and future state-of-the-art federal communications links Possibility with None USAF nontraining flights. Yes No Airport and Aircraft Security Parking and visitor access control Yes No Dedicated full time airport security force Yes No Fencing- 6’ minimum, 8’ new with barbed wire or razor wire Yes No Minimum 3-foot candle power on ramp Yes No Gated with electronic protection Yes No Current Fire Protection Capability Can support continuation of 91-96% initial wildland fire attack success rate (Unit Fire Plan and CFES2 fire suppression simulations) Yes Yes 1
Issue March Hemet-Ryan Can co-host CDF and USFS air tanker refueling for large joint missions Yes No Provide full coverage of existing SRA lands not also within Ramona Air Base circle (Unit Fire Plan and fire history show that most big fires are to east of both sites) Yes Yes Location vis a vis growing population in Closer Farther to Wildand Urban Interface (WUI) southeast Location vis a vis areas with greatest burn frequency (Times burned graphic) Equal Equal Location vis a vis Ignitions Closer Farther to (Riverside 2005 Fire Plan) southeast Location vis a vis 2004 Initial attack Closer Farther to success density (Riverside 2005 Fire Plan) southeast Location vis a vis 2004 Initial attack Farther Closer. Failures failure density (Riverside 2005 Fire are typically Plan) Future Fire Protection Capability farther from engines, stations, roads, and houses Completed engineering plans for upgrade to at least a 6,000’ runway (CDF and USFS air base standards to handle all air tankers used in the Western US) Yes No Additional cost to complete full engineering plans (estimate) $0 $1,429,000 Additional time to complete full engineering drawings (Hemet replacement schedule) Exist, 2 months 48 months State General Funds for airbase upgrade in current State budget - $8,296,000 Yes No Agreement for FAA funds to construct expanded runway Not necessary No ESA habitat issues fully addressed under Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP) and Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) completed for loss of habitat due to longer runway facility, any adjacent local roads, and any new buildings Yes No 2
Page 1 and 2: Airbase Relocation Evaluation Calif
Page 3 and 4: Airbase Relocation Evaluation - Sec
Page 5: Hemet-Ryan Air Base from 30,000 fee
Page 9 and 10: Hemet/March Relocation Review Aviat
Page 11 and 12: IFR weather days versus the number
Page 13 and 14: March/Hemet-Ryan Comparison Below i
Page 15 and 16: Attachment A 91.157 Special VFR wea
Page 17 and 18: Attachment B Hemet Weather 2004 (Su
Page 19 and 20: 27 VFR 2+22 27 VFR 27 VFR 27 IFR 2+
Page 21 and 22: Accessibility of retardant and bulk
Page 23 and 24: Assessing current fire protection c
Page 25 and 26: # # # # Riverside # # # # # # # # #
Page 27 and 28: xy„iX g2—2SP22 —2—— IS222
Page 30 and 31: Fire Assets, Ignitions, Initial Att
Page 32 and 33: 2005 Riverside Unit Pre-Fire Manage
Page 34 and 35: Southern California Subdivisions ad
Page 36 and 37: March Air base would provide roughl
Page 38 and 39: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/tools/CFES/c
Page 40 and 41: This graphic depicts the overall ge
Page 42 and 43: Relocate to March Air Base
Page 44 and 45: PROJECT: HEMET RYAN AAB WD ESTIMATE
Page 47 and 48: Rebuild at Hemet
Page 49 and 50: PROJECT: HEMET RYAN AAB ESTIMATE: 1
Page 52 and 53: Potential Multi-Species Habitat Con
Page 54 and 55: The Master Plan only looks at direc
Page 58 and 59:
SR 79 Realignment Project Descripti
Page 60 and 61:
2005 Riverside Unit Pre-Fire Manage
Page 62 and 63:
2005 Riverside Unit Fire Management
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Collaboration 2005 Riverside Unit F
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Assets at Risk 2005 Riverside Unit
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Playing with Fire 8% 2005 Riverside
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Ignitions Workload Analysis Matrix
Page 88 and 89:
Ignitions Workload Analysis Matrix
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Past Projects Lake Mathews VMP 2005
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Red Hill Fuelbreak 2005 Riverside U
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110:
show all

Unit - State of California

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?