Unit - State of California

More documents

Recommendations

Info

This graphic depicts the overall geographical context of a CFES2 simulation. As a hypothetical example, this FMAZ is the ranger unit’s Brush planning belt. The Brush Planning Belt has a Medium level of structure protection intensity. The two representative fire locations shown represent differences in travel times and dispatch policies (i.e., type, and number of suppression resources). The FMAZ is relatively homogeneous with respect to weather. Each Quad 81 st in the FMAZ is associated with one or the other of the two RFLs (but not both). James Spero ,CDF Fire and Resource Assessment Program , 2002
Hemet-Ryan AAB Capital Outlay Project Relocation Or Replacement Analysis Attached are schedules and estimates for the relocation of the CDF air attack base to March Air Reserve Base or the replacement of the CDF airbase at Ryan Field in Hemet. The following narrative is to be used in conjunction with these documents: Relocation to March ARB: • The project California Environmental Quality Act, lease, development agreement and design is complete and the project is essentially ready to bid. • General Funding (GF), $8,296,000 for the Construction phase of this project was re-appropriated in Fiscal Year 05/06. • Completion of this project is scheduled for May of 2007. This assumes the final decision to relocate is made by November 2005. Replacement at Hemet: • This project would be treated as a “New Start.” If this project is funded as part of the typical Capital Outlay process, the earliest that funding could be anticipated is Fiscal Year 07/08. • General Funds, $17,330,000, should be the anticipated funding source for this project. Please note that CDF has never had a project funded from GF at this value. Additionally, lease revenue bond funding typically does not work for projects on leased sites. • This project’s best case scenario for schedule and estimated costs is based on the following: o Utilization of General Funds. o Improvements required on “State” property. o Riverside County would need CEQA clearance and funding or would have to already be in construction of offsite improvements prior to the State Public Works Board (PWB) approving this project in September 2008. In addition, Riverside County would be required to enter an agreement with the state to commit county resources to the project before funding would be authorized and granted. o Dept. of General Services’ Real Estate Services Division would be responsible for management of the project. o CEQA for the “State” project is anticipated to be a Negative Declaration. This must be completed prior to PWB approval of the project. o Property rights “Lease” must be complete prior to PWB approval. The county must commit to the same terms and commitments agreed to in the lease and landing fee agreement for March. o Hazardous materials mitigation and remediation is limited to structures. • Scheduled Completion of the “State” project is November 2011, assuming all CEQA clearance and funding issues are finalized by September 2008
Page 1 and 2: Airbase Relocation Evaluation Calif
Page 3 and 4: Airbase Relocation Evaluation - Sec
Page 5 and 6: Hemet-Ryan Air Base from 30,000 fee
Page 7 and 8: Issue March Hemet-Ryan Can co-host
Page 9 and 10: Hemet/March Relocation Review Aviat
Page 11 and 12: IFR weather days versus the number
Page 13 and 14: March/Hemet-Ryan Comparison Below i
Page 15 and 16: Attachment A 91.157 Special VFR wea
Page 17 and 18: Attachment B Hemet Weather 2004 (Su
Page 19 and 20: 27 VFR 2+22 27 VFR 27 VFR 27 IFR 2+
Page 21 and 22: Accessibility of retardant and bulk
Page 23 and 24: Assessing current fire protection c
Page 25 and 26: # # # # Riverside # # # # # # # # #
Page 27 and 28: xy„iX g2—2SP22 —2—— IS222
Page 30 and 31: Fire Assets, Ignitions, Initial Att
Page 32 and 33: 2005 Riverside Unit Pre-Fire Manage
Page 34 and 35: Southern California Subdivisions ad
Page 36 and 37: March Air base would provide roughl
Page 38 and 39: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/tools/CFES/c
Page 42 and 43: Relocate to March Air Base
Page 44 and 45: PROJECT: HEMET RYAN AAB WD ESTIMATE
Page 47 and 48: Rebuild at Hemet
Page 49 and 50: PROJECT: HEMET RYAN AAB ESTIMATE: 1
Page 52 and 53: Potential Multi-Species Habitat Con
Page 54 and 55: The Master Plan only looks at direc
Page 58 and 59: SR 79 Realignment Project Descripti
Page 62 and 63: 2005 Riverside Unit Fire Management
Page 66 and 67: Collaboration 2005 Riverside Unit F
Page 72 and 73: Assets at Risk 2005 Riverside Unit
Page 82 and 83: Playing with Fire 8% 2005 Riverside
Page 86 and 87: Ignitions Workload Analysis Matrix
Page 88 and 89: Ignitions Workload Analysis Matrix
Page 90 and 91:
2005 Riverside Unit Pre-Fire Manage
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Past Projects Lake Mathews VMP 2005
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Red Hill Fuelbreak 2005 Riverside U
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110:
show all

Unit - State of California

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?