Unit - State of California

More documents

Recommendations

Info

o Pre-use inspection procedures for any retardants, chemicals and hazardous materials • Plan must identify any areas of facility that are “Restricted” o Identify whether fixed-wing or rotor-wing parking is “Restricted” o Specify identification system used for “Restricted” areas Color coded shirts, hats, jackets, etc. ID badges • Other technique • Plan must ensure information protection o Ensure protection of security codes o Specify intervals to change/update security codes Physical security measures • Lock aircraft • Aircraft shall be secured in locked hangar where available Materials Handling (Retardant, petroleum products, fuels, chemicals, agricultural products, etc) • Pre-delivery/off-site: o Ensure secure chain-of-custody of materials • Materials storage: o Utilize tamper-proof/tamper-evident seals and/or locks o Distribution of hazardous materials monitored by authorized persons
Assessing current fire protection capability of two different air base locations It is well known that fixed wing and helicopter based aircraft are integral and often used components of the fire suppression system in Southern California and in Riverside County. For Riverside County, the best summary of the effectiveness of the overall fire suppression system is the “Riverside Unit Fire Management Plan 2005” (Anthony 2005). This is posted on the CDF web site at http://www.fire.ca.gov/FireEmergencyResponse/FirePlan/units_countyfireplan.asp and is also available at any CDF unit on the CDF’s intranet at http://cdfweb/Its/FirePAS/UnitFireMgtPlans/RRU.pdf . In addition to describing the overall approach of the Fire Plan, the document provides detailed information on the specific assets at risk for each battalion within the County as well as a detailed Ignition Workload Assessment that summarizes where wildland fires start in the county, the type of ignition, and the whether the fire is contained within initial attack. The 2005 Fire Plan notes that Riverside Unit achieves very good initial attack success, for grass fuel types – 96%, brush fuel types – 91%, woodland – 94% and conifer forests – 95%. These high success rates are due in large part to the quick arrival of a range of fire suppression resources in initial attack – fire engines, hand crews, bulldozers, fixed wing aircraft, and helicopters. Using the California Fire Economics Simulator to assess different location of fire suppression resources The increase, decrease or relocation of any fire suppression resource will change the timing and scale of suppression resources arriving at a fire. To assess the potential impact of moving or building a fire engine station, adding additional resources to existing stations, or locating or relocating, CDF worked with the University of California to develop a tool to accurately predict any potential changes in initial attack success due to changing the number and location of fire suppression resources. The details of the tool, known as the California Fire Economics Simulator (CFES2), are described in the two attached memorandum – “CFES2 – California Fire Economics Simulator” (Stewart 2002) and “CFES2 in Brief” (Spero 2002) that were prepared for briefings of legislative staff and the Department of Finance. Basically, an accurate comparison of the potential differences between the two proposed air tankers locations requires three primary components to ensure that the results match the real world conditions. 1. A database of the potential fire starts and weather conditions that replicates historic, and presumably future, conditions. This database should include best case and the worst case, and scenarios describing everything in between in the same proportions that they occur.
Page 1 and 2: Airbase Relocation Evaluation Calif
Page 3 and 4: Airbase Relocation Evaluation - Sec
Page 5 and 6: Hemet-Ryan Air Base from 30,000 fee
Page 7 and 8: Issue March Hemet-Ryan Can co-host
Page 9 and 10: Hemet/March Relocation Review Aviat
Page 11 and 12: IFR weather days versus the number
Page 13 and 14: March/Hemet-Ryan Comparison Below i
Page 15 and 16: Attachment A 91.157 Special VFR wea
Page 17 and 18: Attachment B Hemet Weather 2004 (Su
Page 19 and 20: 27 VFR 2+22 27 VFR 27 VFR 27 IFR 2+
Page 21: Accessibility of retardant and bulk
Page 25 and 26: # # # # Riverside # # # # # # # # #
Page 27 and 28: xy„iX g2—2SP22 —2—— IS222
Page 30 and 31: Fire Assets, Ignitions, Initial Att
Page 32 and 33: 2005 Riverside Unit Pre-Fire Manage
Page 34 and 35: Southern California Subdivisions ad
Page 36 and 37: March Air base would provide roughl
Page 38 and 39: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/tools/CFES/c
Page 40 and 41: This graphic depicts the overall ge
Page 42 and 43: Relocate to March Air Base
Page 44 and 45: PROJECT: HEMET RYAN AAB WD ESTIMATE
Page 47 and 48: Rebuild at Hemet
Page 49 and 50: PROJECT: HEMET RYAN AAB ESTIMATE: 1
Page 52 and 53: Potential Multi-Species Habitat Con
Page 54 and 55: The Master Plan only looks at direc
Page 58 and 59: SR 79 Realignment Project Descripti
Page 60 and 61: 2005 Riverside Unit Pre-Fire Manage
Page 62 and 63: 2005 Riverside Unit Fire Management
Page 66 and 67: Collaboration 2005 Riverside Unit F
Page 72 and 73:
Assets at Risk 2005 Riverside Unit
Page 74 and 75:
2005 Riverside Unit Fire Management
Page 76 and 77:
2005 Riverside Unit Fire Management
Page 78 and 79:
2005 Riverside Unit Pre-Fire Manage
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Playing with Fire 8% 2005 Riverside
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Ignitions Workload Analysis Matrix
Page 88 and 89:
Ignitions Workload Analysis Matrix
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Past Projects Lake Mathews VMP 2005
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Red Hill Fuelbreak 2005 Riverside U
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110:
show all

Unit - State of California

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?