Download - FMC Corporation

Total Waste by Type (KTons )
50
40
30
20
10
0
Global Waste by Type
2010
KTons Non-Hazardous Waste
KTons Industrial Waste
2011 2012
During 2012, FMC focused on a standard waste intensity
measurement across all sites. This effort resulted in a 29
percent decrease in total waste produced per ton, driven
primarily by efforts to reduce the volume of waste sent
to landfills.
Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Total GHG Emissions (Mtons CO 2 e )
Total Water Use (Billions of gallons )
5
4
3
2
1
0
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2010
Includes both direct and
indirect emissions
Global Water Usage
2010
Excludes once-thru
cooling water
2011 2012
Greenhouse gas intensity remained essentially flat in 2012.
The resources employed to assess energy management will
also have a positive impact on greenhouse gas intensity.
2011 2012
FMC improved its water efficiency by nearly 8 percent in 2012.
26
FOCUSED FORWARD
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
4
3
2
1
0
Water Intensity
MINDING OUR
RESOURCES
FOCUSED ON EFFICIENCY
Waste Intensity
GHG Intensity
Total Energy Usage (Millions MMBTU)
50
40
30
20
10
0
Global Energy Usage
2010
2011 2012
FMC reduced energy intensity by an additional 4 percent
during 2012. The company’s newly established Energy
Management Center of Excellence has begun its work to
systematically identify efficiency opportunities across our
manufacturing network.
Total Criteria Pollutant Emissions
(Ktons of PM, NOx , SOx , CO, VOCs, H2 S )
Global Criteria Pollutant Emissions
20
15
10
5
0
2010
2011 2012
The intensity of criteria emissions increased by
8 percent in 2012 primarily due to abnormal
disruptions in production at our lithium operation
in Argentina.
Data presented on this page include FMC owned
and operated manufacturing locations globally.
10
8
6
4
Energy Intensity
Our Agricultural Products business uses contract
manufacturers to produce the majority of its active
ingredients. The impact of these manufacturers
is not represented in the numbers provided in this
report. FMC is in the process of collecting comparable
information for our primary active ingredient
manufacturers. As our program evolves, we will
provide the information collected and any identified
opportunities for improvement.
Visit our website to access
data illustrated in the above
graphs as well as calculation
methodology.
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
Criteria Pollutant Intensity