Declaration in support of motion to amend complaint - Fair Political ...
Declaration in support of motion to amend complaint - Fair Political ...
Declaration in support of motion to amend complaint - Fair Political ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
“Agua Caliente Band <strong>of</strong> Cahuilla Indians Economic Development.” True and correct copies <strong>of</strong> the<br />
relevant pages <strong>of</strong> Yes on 51’s quarterly campaign statement are attached here<strong>to</strong> as Exhibit C and are<br />
<strong>in</strong>corporated here<strong>in</strong> by this reference. Note that, because this document was filed electronically, it was<br />
electronically signed, and a physical signature is not necessary for the verification <strong>to</strong> be valid.<br />
8. Based on the above-stated facts, it became necessary for Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff FPPC <strong>to</strong> <strong>amend</strong> its<br />
compla<strong>in</strong>t <strong>to</strong> allege, based upon <strong>in</strong>formation and belief, that on or about March 13, 2002, Defendant<br />
Agua Caliente Band made a contribution <strong>of</strong> $125,000, from its Economic Development fund,<br />
designated for Yes on Proposition 51, with the Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Conservation League serv<strong>in</strong>g as an<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediary for that contribution. Defendant Agua Caliente Band did not disclose this $125,000<br />
contribution on its semi-annual campaign statement, which was filed on or about July 31, 2002, for the<br />
report<strong>in</strong>g period January 1, 2002 through June 30, 2002. Defendant Agua Caliente Band further<br />
misreported its <strong>to</strong>tal contributions for this period by at least $125,000.<br />
9. Defendant Agua Caliente Band has not yet responded <strong>to</strong> the First Amended Compla<strong>in</strong>t,<br />
and has until November 15, 2002, <strong>to</strong> do so, pursuant <strong>to</strong> an agreement between the parties that service <strong>of</strong><br />
the First Amended Compla<strong>in</strong>t was deemed completed on Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 16, 2002, and that an <strong>in</strong>itial response<br />
<strong>to</strong> that compla<strong>in</strong>t is due 30 days from that date.<br />
10. It is necessary that the FPPC be permitted <strong>to</strong> file its Second Amended Compla<strong>in</strong>t so that<br />
justice may be served and so that all <strong>of</strong> the Agua Caliente Band’s violations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Political</strong> Reform Act<br />
<strong>to</strong> date may be resolved <strong>in</strong> one action, rather than requir<strong>in</strong>g the FPPC <strong>to</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g multiple actions <strong>to</strong><br />
resolve these matters aga<strong>in</strong>st the Agua Caliente Band.<br />
I declare under penalty <strong>of</strong> perjury under the laws <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> California that the forego<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
true and correct, except for those matters stated on <strong>in</strong>formation and belief and as <strong>to</strong> those matters, I<br />
believe them <strong>to</strong> be true.<br />
Executed this 29th day <strong>of</strong> Oc<strong>to</strong>ber, 2002 at Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, California.<br />
__________________________<br />
STEVEN BENITO RUSSO<br />
4<br />
DECLARATION OF STEVEN BENITO RUSSO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND