26.10.2013 Views

Declaration in support of motion to amend complaint - Fair Political ...

Declaration in support of motion to amend complaint - Fair Political ...

Declaration in support of motion to amend complaint - Fair Political ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

“Agua Caliente Band <strong>of</strong> Cahuilla Indians Economic Development.” True and correct copies <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relevant pages <strong>of</strong> Yes on 51’s quarterly campaign statement are attached here<strong>to</strong> as Exhibit C and are<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporated here<strong>in</strong> by this reference. Note that, because this document was filed electronically, it was<br />

electronically signed, and a physical signature is not necessary for the verification <strong>to</strong> be valid.<br />

8. Based on the above-stated facts, it became necessary for Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff FPPC <strong>to</strong> <strong>amend</strong> its<br />

compla<strong>in</strong>t <strong>to</strong> allege, based upon <strong>in</strong>formation and belief, that on or about March 13, 2002, Defendant<br />

Agua Caliente Band made a contribution <strong>of</strong> $125,000, from its Economic Development fund,<br />

designated for Yes on Proposition 51, with the Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Conservation League serv<strong>in</strong>g as an<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediary for that contribution. Defendant Agua Caliente Band did not disclose this $125,000<br />

contribution on its semi-annual campaign statement, which was filed on or about July 31, 2002, for the<br />

report<strong>in</strong>g period January 1, 2002 through June 30, 2002. Defendant Agua Caliente Band further<br />

misreported its <strong>to</strong>tal contributions for this period by at least $125,000.<br />

9. Defendant Agua Caliente Band has not yet responded <strong>to</strong> the First Amended Compla<strong>in</strong>t,<br />

and has until November 15, 2002, <strong>to</strong> do so, pursuant <strong>to</strong> an agreement between the parties that service <strong>of</strong><br />

the First Amended Compla<strong>in</strong>t was deemed completed on Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 16, 2002, and that an <strong>in</strong>itial response<br />

<strong>to</strong> that compla<strong>in</strong>t is due 30 days from that date.<br />

10. It is necessary that the FPPC be permitted <strong>to</strong> file its Second Amended Compla<strong>in</strong>t so that<br />

justice may be served and so that all <strong>of</strong> the Agua Caliente Band’s violations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Political</strong> Reform Act<br />

<strong>to</strong> date may be resolved <strong>in</strong> one action, rather than requir<strong>in</strong>g the FPPC <strong>to</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g multiple actions <strong>to</strong><br />

resolve these matters aga<strong>in</strong>st the Agua Caliente Band.<br />

I declare under penalty <strong>of</strong> perjury under the laws <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> California that the forego<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

true and correct, except for those matters stated on <strong>in</strong>formation and belief and as <strong>to</strong> those matters, I<br />

believe them <strong>to</strong> be true.<br />

Executed this 29th day <strong>of</strong> Oc<strong>to</strong>ber, 2002 at Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, California.<br />

__________________________<br />

STEVEN BENITO RUSSO<br />

4<br />

DECLARATION OF STEVEN BENITO RUSSO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!