manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table T9: Example of a Household BNS Poverty Score .......................................................................... 43 Table T10: Pair-Wise Ranking Showing Food-Source Preferences in Niger .................................. 52 Table T11: Matrix Scoring of Food Sources against Indicators of Preference............................... 52 Table T12: Food Security Impact Calendar Using 25 Counters ............................................................ 54 Table T13: Attribution by Ranking and Scoring for a Food Security Project ................................. 55 Table T14: Reasons for Improved Household Food Security in Niger .............................................. 55 Table T15: Scoring of Changes in Agricultural Income, Doon Valley Project, India ................... 58 Table T16: Scoring of Soil Erosion Control in the Doon Valley Project, India ............................... 59 Table T17: QPA Scoring of Social Equity Indicators for NTFP Enterprises in India ................... 60 Table T18: Estimated Value of Agroforestry Benefits in Zimbabwe .................................................. 63 Table T19: Stakeholder Analysis Profile Matrix............................................................................................ 70 Table T20: Relative Influence and Importance of Key Stakeholders ................................................. 70 Table T21: Stakeholder Analysis Participation Matrix .............................................................................. 73 Table T22: Matrix for Defining Starting Points in Scenario Analysis ................................................. 78 Table T23: Potential Positive (+) and Negative (-) Outcomes and Impacts for Natural Capital by Project Type .................................................................................................... 87 Table T24: Summary of Direct and Indirect Social Outcomes (Observed or Expected) by Project .................................................................................................................................................. 91 Table T25: Observed or Potential Short- to Mid-Term Social Outcomes of Land-Based Carbon Projects ...................................................................................................................................... 95 Table T26: Potential Mid- to Long-Term Social Impacts of Land-Based Carbon Projects ...... 98 Table T27: Indicator Quality Assessment...................................................................................................... 110 Table T28: Data Disaggregation and Analysis, by Indicator ................................................................ 114 Social Impact Assessment of Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | ii
List of Boxes Box T1. General Data Collection and Analysis Methods for SIA ............................................................ 36 Box T2. A Useful Method for Measuring Social Capital .............................................................................. 37 Box T3. Data Collection Methods Proposed in the Social Carbon ‘Zero Point Assessment’ .... 38 Box T4. Measuring Impacts Against a Nominal Baseline .......................................................................... 51 Box T5: Use of Venn Diagrams for Stakeholder Analysis .......................................................................... 71 Box T6. What Makes a Successful Scenario? .................................................................................................... 76 Box T7. Driving Forces in a Community in the Bolivian Amazon ......................................................... 78 Box T8. Features of Good Indicators ................................................................................................................. 105 Box T9. Goals and Indicators Definitions and Distinctions ................................................................... 106 Box T10. Indicators Derived from the Governance of Forests Initiative (GFI) ........................... 112 List of Figures Figure T1: The Main Stages and Steps of the ‘Open Standards’ Methodology .............................. 4 Figure T2: Example of a Conceptual Model for a Watershed Project................................................. 6 Figure T3: Conceptual Model Example with Key Factors and Strategies Identified .................. 7 Figure T4: Generic Conceptual Model with Action Plan Components ............................................... 8 Figure T5: Results Chain for Improved Land Use Planning in Watershed Example .................. 9 Figure T6: Land Use Planning Results Chain with Potential Indicators ........................................... 9 Figure T7: Diagram of the ROtI Analytical Framework.......................................................................... 12 Figure T8: Steps in the Focus Group ROtI Exercise .................................................................................. 14 Figure T9: Stages in Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis ........................................................... 19 Figure T10: PIPA Impact Logic Model for the Strategic Innovation in Dryland Farming Project, Ghana ........................................................................................................................................................ 23 Social Impact Assessment of Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | iii
Page 1 and 2: MANUAL FOR SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Page 3: Table of Contents T1 Introduction t
Page 7 and 8: Forest Trends’ mission is to main
Page 9 and 10: List of Acronyms (Core Guidance and
Page 11 and 12: Sections T5 and T6 present a range
Page 13 and 14: Figure T1: The Main Stages and Step
Page 15 and 16: Figure T2: Example of a Conceptual
Page 17 and 18: Figure T4: Generic Conceptual Model
Page 19 and 20: Stages 3-5 of Open Standards The re
Page 21 and 22: Figure T7: Diagram of the ROtI Anal
Page 23 and 24: table so they can be read, discusse
Page 25 and 26: Table T1: Theory of Change for Seyc
Page 27 and 28: T2.4 Participatory Impact Pathways
Page 29 and 30: Table T4: The PIPA Outcomes Logic M
Page 31 and 32: Main Sources and Further Guidance h
Page 33 and 34: T3 Sustainability Framework Approac
Page 35 and 36: Figure T12: SAPA Initiative Modifie
Page 37 and 38: 1. Identify a small group of key in
Page 39 and 40: Table T6: Example of LOAM Livelihoo
Page 41 and 42: T4 Matching Methods T4.1 Introducti
Page 43 and 44: Advantages and Disadvantages of ‘
Page 45 and 46: Box T1. General Data Collection and
Page 47 and 48: Box T3. Data Collection Methods Pro
Page 49 and 50: T6 Specific Data Collection Methods
Page 51 and 52: Table T8: Example of a Household BN
Page 53 and 54: The poverty index can range from 0%
Page 55 and 56:
The PIA guide proposes the followin
Page 57 and 58:
day. The ‘before project’ score
Page 59 and 60:
Figure T15: “Before and After”
Page 61 and 62:
Table T10: Pair-Wise Ranking Showin
Page 63 and 64:
Impact calendars Impact calendars c
Page 65 and 66:
A large sample is needed to be conf
Page 67 and 68:
Table T15: Scoring of Changes in Ag
Page 69 and 70:
Table T17: QPA Scoring of Social Eq
Page 71 and 72:
T6.4 Participatory Economic Valuati
Page 73 and 74:
Advantages and Disadvantages of Par
Page 75 and 76:
The stories are collected from thos
Page 77 and 78:
Main Sources and Further Guidance D
Page 79 and 80:
Table T19: Stakeholder Analysis Pro
Page 81 and 82:
Figure T18. Venn Diagram with Stake
Page 83 and 84:
T7.2 Problem Trees Assuming it is p
Page 85 and 86:
T7.3 Scenario Analysis Scenarios ar
Page 87 and 88:
Box T7. Driving Forces in a Communi
Page 89 and 90:
Maack, J.N. 2001. Scenario analysis
Page 91 and 92:
In terms of non-monetary benefits,
Page 93 and 94:
and duration of employment, the sta
Page 95 and 96:
Physical Capital Positive changes i
Page 97 and 98:
these strategic resource off-limits
Page 99 and 100:
einforce existing institutions or n
Page 101 and 102:
PROJECT: PROFAFOR TYPE: Plantations
Page 103 and 104:
their occurrence will depend in lar
Page 105 and 106:
HUMAN CAPITAL Increase in perceptio
Page 107 and 108:
Table T26: Potential Mid- to Long-T
Page 109 and 110:
Figure T20: Example of Relationship
Page 111 and 112:
Figure T22: Additional Potential So
Page 113 and 114:
T9 Further Guidance on Indicator Se
Page 115 and 116:
Box T9. Goals and Indicators Defini
Page 117 and 118:
When selecting indicators, it is be
Page 119 and 120:
Table T27: Indicator Quality Assess
Page 121 and 122:
Box T10. Indicators Derived from th
Page 123 and 124:
T9.5 Disaggregating Indicators Mult
Page 125 and 126:
Mayoux, L. 2001. What Do We Want to
Page 127 and 128:
Landscape Outcomes Assessment Metho
Page 129 and 130:
• Access to essential services (w
Page 131 and 132:
T10.3 Social Indicators Derived fro
Page 133 and 134:
Empowerment of women indicators:
Page 135 and 136:
CCBA, 2008. Climate, Community & Bi
Page 137 and 138:
James A., Pangtey V., Singh P. & Vi
Page 139:
SEEP Network. 2006. Social Performa
show all

manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?