manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table T6: Example <strong>of</strong> LOAM Livelihood Indicators and Scoring Approach – East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania<br />
Scoring 1 2 3 4 5<br />
NATURAL CAPITAL<br />
Village <strong>for</strong>est reserves No progress Discussion initiated village<br />
level<br />
Approved by village Approved by district council Management plan<br />
implemented<br />
Riparian strips protected No protection Awareness <strong>of</strong> need Some protection Widespread protection All riverbanks restored<br />
Presence <strong>of</strong> trees in gaps<br />
(corridors)<br />
No trees Discussion about planting Nurseries established Some tree planting Lots <strong>of</strong> tree planting<br />
Native species planted in<br />
corridors<br />
No native species Discussion about planting Nurseries established Some tree planting Lots <strong>of</strong> tree planting<br />
Enhancing/encouraging nat. No enhancement Some enhancement Enhancement Significant enhancement Abundant natural<br />
regeneration in corridors<br />
SOCIAL CAPITAL<br />
regeneration<br />
Village NR committees Not established Discussion <strong>of</strong> establish. Committee established Committee active Committee effective<br />
Village participation in<br />
No networks Establishment <strong>of</strong> networks Local networks effective Establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>land</strong>scape Landscape level networks<br />
<strong>land</strong>scape level<br />
level networks<br />
effective<br />
Joint <strong>Forest</strong> Management No JFM Initiation <strong>of</strong> discussions JFM established JFM agreement signed Fully operational JFM<br />
Awareness <strong>of</strong><br />
No awareness Some uncertainty Some progress in Boundaries mostly<br />
Boundaries clearly<br />
zones/boundaries<br />
recognition<br />
recognized<br />
recognized<br />
Management <strong>of</strong> village<br />
Very poor<br />
Some management Intermediate<br />
Good management Excellent, transparent<br />
finances<br />
HUMAN CAPITAL<br />
management capacity<br />
management<br />
process<br />
Education (primary school No access to school School more than 1 hours School outside village, School in village, but Good quality school<br />
distance)<br />
walk<br />
but < 1 hour walk facilities poor<br />
accessible<br />
Health (e.g. no. clinics) No access to health Health service > 1 hours Health service < 1 hour Health service in village, but Good quality health service<br />
service<br />
walk<br />
walk (but not in village) facilities poor<br />
Skill levels and opportunities No access to skill Limited access to skill Average access to skill Above average skills/access Good level <strong>of</strong> skills and skill<br />
opportunities opportunities<br />
opportunities<br />
to skill opportunities opportunities<br />
Health status <strong>of</strong> village Sig. below average Below average Average Above average health Good health<br />
Involved in innovative projects No involvement Some involvement Average involvement Much involvement A lot <strong>of</strong> involvement<br />
Source: Reproduced with permission from Aldrich, M. and Sayer, J. 2007. In Practice – Landscape Outcomes Assessment Methodology "LOAM". WWF <strong>Forest</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Life<br />
Programme. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/loaminpracticemay07.pdf<br />
Social Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | 30
Change language