manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
Figure T13: Radar or Spider Diagram Based on LOAM Analysis Source: Reproduced with permission from Aldrich, M. and Sayer, J. 2007. In Practice – Landscape Outcomes Assessment Methodology "LOAM". WWF Forests for Life Programme http://assets.panda.org/downloads/loaminpracticemay07.pdf Social Impact Assessment of Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | 29
Table T6: Example of LOAM Livelihood Indicators and Scoring Approach – East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania Scoring 1 2 3 4 5 NATURAL CAPITAL Village forest reserves No progress Discussion initiated village level Approved by village Approved by district council Management plan implemented Riparian strips protected No protection Awareness of need Some protection Widespread protection All riverbanks restored Presence of trees in gaps (corridors) No trees Discussion about planting Nurseries established Some tree planting Lots of tree planting Native species planted in corridors No native species Discussion about planting Nurseries established Some tree planting Lots of tree planting Enhancing/encouraging nat. No enhancement Some enhancement Enhancement Significant enhancement Abundant natural regeneration in corridors SOCIAL CAPITAL regeneration Village NR committees Not established Discussion of establish. Committee established Committee active Committee effective Village participation in No networks Establishment of networks Local networks effective Establishment of landscape Landscape level networks landscape level level networks effective Joint Forest Management No JFM Initiation of discussions JFM established JFM agreement signed Fully operational JFM Awareness of No awareness Some uncertainty Some progress in Boundaries mostly Boundaries clearly zones/boundaries recognition recognized recognized Management of village Very poor Some management Intermediate Good management Excellent, transparent finances HUMAN CAPITAL management capacity management process Education (primary school No access to school School more than 1 hours School outside village, School in village, but Good quality school distance) walk but < 1 hour walk facilities poor accessible Health (e.g. no. clinics) No access to health Health service > 1 hours Health service < 1 hour Health service in village, but Good quality health service service walk walk (but not in village) facilities poor Skill levels and opportunities No access to skill Limited access to skill Average access to skill Above average skills/access Good level of skills and skill opportunities opportunities opportunities to skill opportunities opportunities Health status of village Sig. below average Below average Average Above average health Good health Involved in innovative projects No involvement Some involvement Average involvement Much involvement A lot of involvement Source: Reproduced with permission from Aldrich, M. and Sayer, J. 2007. In Practice – Landscape Outcomes Assessment Methodology "LOAM". WWF Forests for Life Programme. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/loaminpracticemay07.pdf Social Impact Assessment of Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | 30
- Page 1 and 2: MANUAL FOR SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents T1 Introduction t
- Page 5 and 6: List of Boxes Box T1. General Data
- Page 7 and 8: Forest Trends’ mission is to main
- Page 9 and 10: List of Acronyms (Core Guidance and
- Page 11 and 12: Sections T5 and T6 present a range
- Page 13 and 14: Figure T1: The Main Stages and Step
- Page 15 and 16: Figure T2: Example of a Conceptual
- Page 17 and 18: Figure T4: Generic Conceptual Model
- Page 19 and 20: Stages 3-5 of Open Standards The re
- Page 21 and 22: Figure T7: Diagram of the ROtI Anal
- Page 23 and 24: table so they can be read, discusse
- Page 25 and 26: Table T1: Theory of Change for Seyc
- Page 27 and 28: T2.4 Participatory Impact Pathways
- Page 29 and 30: Table T4: The PIPA Outcomes Logic M
- Page 31 and 32: Main Sources and Further Guidance h
- Page 33 and 34: T3 Sustainability Framework Approac
- Page 35 and 36: Figure T12: SAPA Initiative Modifie
- Page 37: 1. Identify a small group of key in
- Page 41 and 42: T4 Matching Methods T4.1 Introducti
- Page 43 and 44: Advantages and Disadvantages of ‘
- Page 45 and 46: Box T1. General Data Collection and
- Page 47 and 48: Box T3. Data Collection Methods Pro
- Page 49 and 50: T6 Specific Data Collection Methods
- Page 51 and 52: Table T8: Example of a Household BN
- Page 53 and 54: The poverty index can range from 0%
- Page 55 and 56: The PIA guide proposes the followin
- Page 57 and 58: day. The ‘before project’ score
- Page 59 and 60: Figure T15: “Before and After”
- Page 61 and 62: Table T10: Pair-Wise Ranking Showin
- Page 63 and 64: Impact calendars Impact calendars c
- Page 65 and 66: A large sample is needed to be conf
- Page 67 and 68: Table T15: Scoring of Changes in Ag
- Page 69 and 70: Table T17: QPA Scoring of Social Eq
- Page 71 and 72: T6.4 Participatory Economic Valuati
- Page 73 and 74: Advantages and Disadvantages of Par
- Page 75 and 76: The stories are collected from thos
- Page 77 and 78: Main Sources and Further Guidance D
- Page 79 and 80: Table T19: Stakeholder Analysis Pro
- Page 81 and 82: Figure T18. Venn Diagram with Stake
- Page 83 and 84: T7.2 Problem Trees Assuming it is p
- Page 85 and 86: T7.3 Scenario Analysis Scenarios ar
- Page 87 and 88: Box T7. Driving Forces in a Communi
Figure T13: Radar or Spider Diagram Based on LOAM Analysis<br />
Source: Reproduced with permission from Aldrich, M. and Sayer, J. 2007. In Practice – Landscape Outcomes<br />
Assessment Methodology "LOAM". WWF <strong>Forest</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Life Programme<br />
http://assets.panda.org/downloads/loaminpracticemay07.pdf<br />
Social Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | 29
Change language