manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
References<br />
Aldrich, M. and Sayer, J. 2007. In Practice – Landscape Outcomes Assessment Methodology "LOAM".<br />
WWF <strong>Forest</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Life Programme.<br />
http://assets.panda.org/downloads/loaminpracticemay07.pdf<br />
Angelsen, A. & Wunder, S. 2003. Exploring the <strong>Forest</strong>-Poverty Link: Key Concepts, Issues and<br />
Research Implications. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 40. Center <strong>for</strong> International <strong>Forest</strong>ry<br />
Research. Bogor, Indonesia.<br />
Angelsen, A. (ed.) 2008. Moving ahead with REDD: Issues, options and implications. CIFOR, Bogor,<br />
Indonesia.<br />
Antle J.M. and J.J. Stroovogel. 2008. Agricultural carbon sequestration, poverty, and sustainability.<br />
Environment and Development Economics 13: 327–352.<br />
Asquith, N. and Wunder, S. 2008. Payments <strong>for</strong> Watershed Services: The Bellagio Conversations.<br />
Fundación Natura, Bolivia: Santa Cruz de la Sierra.<br />
Blaustein, R.J., 2009. Copenhagen to See New <strong>Forest</strong>ry Standard. EcosystemMarketplace. com:<br />
http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/article.page.php?<br />
page_id=7375§ion=news_articles&eod=1 (10 May, 2010).<br />
Bond, I. and J. Mayers. 2010. Fair deals <strong>for</strong> watershed services: Lessons from a multi-country actionlearning<br />
project, Natural Resource Issues No. 13. IIED, London<br />
Bond, I. et al. 2009. Incentives to sustain <strong>for</strong>est ecosystem services: A review and lessons <strong>for</strong> REDD.<br />
Natural Resouce Issues No. 16. International Institute <strong>for</strong> Environment and Development,<br />
London, UK, with CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, and World Resources Institute, Washington D.C.,<br />
USA.<br />
Boyd, E. 2002. The Noel Kempff project in Bolivia: Gender, power and decision-making in climate<br />
mitigation. Gender and Development 10.2: 70-77.<br />
Brown D., F. Seymour and L. Peskett. 2008. How do we achieve REDD co-benefits and avoid doing<br />
harm? 107-118 in Angelsen, A. (ed.) 2008 Moving ahead with REDD: Issues, options and<br />
implications. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.<br />
Campbell B., Vermeulen S. & Lynam T. 1991. Value <strong>of</strong> Trees in the Small-Scale Farming Sector <strong>of</strong><br />
Zimbabwe. IDRC-MR302e. International Development Research Centre. Ottawa, Canada.<br />
CARE. 2002. Household Livelihood Security Assessments. A Toolkit <strong>for</strong> Practitioners, Prepared <strong>for</strong> the<br />
PHLS Unit by: TANGO International Inc., Tucson, Arizona 2002, US<br />
www.proventionconsortium.org/themes/default/pdfs/CRA/HLSA2002_meth.pdf<br />
Carter, S. 2009. Socio-economic benefits in Plan Vivo projects: Trees <strong>for</strong> Global Benefits, Uganda,<br />
Plan Vivo Foundation and ECOTRUST.<br />
Catley, A., Burns, J. , Adebe, D. & Suji, O. 2007. Participatory Impact Assessment. A Guide <strong>for</strong><br />
Practitioners. Feinstein International Center, Tufts University. Med<strong>for</strong>d, USA<br />
http://wikis.uit.tufts.edu/conference/display/FIC/Participatory+Impact+Assessment<br />
Social Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | 125