26.10.2013 Views

male involvement in family planning decision making in ile-ife, osun ...

male involvement in family planning decision making in ile-ife, osun ...

male involvement in family planning decision making in ile-ife, osun ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MALE INVOLVEMENT IN FAMILY<br />

PLANNING DECISION MAKING IN ILE‐IFE,<br />

OSUN STATE.<br />

IJADUNOLA MACELLINA YINYINADE (M.D, M.P.H),<br />

IJADUNOLA K.T, ABIONA T.C, ESIMAI O.A, AFOLABI O.T<br />

OBAFEMI AWOLOWO UNIVERSITY, ILE‐IFE<br />

THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FAMILY PLANNING<br />

RESEARCH AND BEST PRACTICES<br />

NOVEMBER 15‐18, 2009<br />

KAMPALA, UGANDA


BACKGROUND<br />

• Nigeria is the most populous country <strong>in</strong> sub‐<br />

Saharan Africa, with a population of 140<br />

million people <strong>in</strong> 2006<br />

• Contemporary research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs revealed that<br />

men's’ knowledge and attitude about FP<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence women’s choices and practices<br />

• Fertility and FP research and programmes<br />

have ignored men’s roles <strong>in</strong> the past, focus<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on women<br />

12/13/2009 2


Study Aim<br />

• To determ<strong>in</strong>e the extent of <strong>male</strong><br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>volvement</strong> <strong>in</strong> reproductive goal <strong>decision</strong><br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g and FP service utilization among<br />

couples <strong>in</strong> Ile‐Ife, Nigeria<br />

12/13/2009 3


Objectives<br />

• Assess men’s knowledge, attitude, practice of<br />

modern contraceptive methods<br />

• Assess the level of spousal communication <strong>in</strong><br />

FP <strong>decision</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Describe the op<strong>in</strong>ions of FP providers toward<br />

<strong>male</strong> participation <strong>in</strong> RH services<br />

12/13/2009 4


• Study location<br />

Methodology<br />

• Study design: Quantitative (Cross‐sectional)<br />

and qualitative (FGDs and IDIs) methods<br />

• Study population<br />

• Sample size: 400 <strong>male</strong>s, 200 fe<strong>male</strong>s<br />

12/13/2009 5


OBJECTIVE<br />

OBJECTIVE 1:<br />

Assess me n’s<br />

knowledge, attitudes,<br />

and practice of modern<br />

contraceptive methods.<br />

OBJECTIVE 2:<br />

Assess the level of<br />

spousal communication<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>family</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>decision</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

OBJECTIVE 3:<br />

Exam<strong>in</strong>e the attitudes<br />

of <strong>family</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

providers toward <strong>male</strong><br />

participation <strong>in</strong><br />

reproductive health<br />

services.<br />

Methodology<br />

POPULATION TO BE<br />

STUDIED METHODS TO BE USED SAMPLE SIZE<br />

Men of reproductive age<br />

group 15-59 years<br />

•Men with<strong>in</strong> the age group<br />

15-59yrs<br />

•Women of Reproductive<br />

age group 15-49 years<br />

Heads of <strong>family</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

service units <strong>in</strong> selected<br />

health facilities <strong>in</strong> Ile-Ife.<br />

Structured Household<br />

questionnaires<br />

Structured Household<br />

questionnaires and Focus Group<br />

Discussions.<br />

Focus groups were assembled based<br />

on sex, religious affiliation<br />

(Christianity / Islam), age (young<br />

adults and older adults), educational<br />

status (primary education or less &<br />

secondary/tertiary)<br />

•One In-depth Interview per facility<br />

•Review of facility <strong>family</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

service registers<br />

402 Structured<br />

Household<br />

questionnaires<br />

12/13/2009 6<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

402 <strong>male</strong> household<br />

questionnaires<br />

201 fe<strong>male</strong><br />

household<br />

questionnaires<br />

Twelve focu s<br />

groups, each group<br />

consist<strong>in</strong>g of about<br />

8-10 participants.<br />

A Tertiary health facility,<br />

2 secondary health<br />

facilities, 3 Primary<br />

Health Care centre and 4<br />

Private Health facilities<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ile- Ife.


RESULTS<br />

• Age distribution for men ranged between 18‐<br />

59 years >two‐thirds 4th & 5th decades of l<strong>ife</strong><br />

• Majority (84%) were <strong>in</strong> monogamous unions,<br />

wh<strong>ile</strong> others (16%) were <strong>in</strong> polygamous union<br />

• Almost 3% of men and about same proportion<br />

of all respondents had never been to school<br />

wh<strong>ile</strong> about 80% had atta<strong>in</strong>ed secondary or<br />

higher levels of education.<br />

12/13/2009 7


Table 1: Awareness of Survey Respondents<br />

about Modern Family plann<strong>in</strong>g Methods<br />

Awareness of Modern Male<br />

Fe<strong>male</strong> Total<br />

Contraceptive Method n=400 (%) n=200 (%) n=600 (%)<br />

Yes 399 (99.8) 198 (99.0) 597 (99.5)<br />

No 1 (0.2) 2 (1.0) 3 (0.5)<br />

*Source of Information Male<br />

Fe<strong>male</strong> Total<br />

n=399 (%) n=198 (%) n=597 (%)<br />

Radio 371 (93.0) 174 (87.9) 545 (91.3)<br />

Friends 354 (88.7) 158 (79.8) 512 (85.8)<br />

Television<br />

Health workers <strong>in</strong> <strong>family</strong><br />

327 (82.0) 155 (78.3) 482 (80.7)<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ic/Hospitals 55 (13.8) 76 (38.3) 131 (21.8)<br />

Books/Journals 9 (2.3) 10 (5.1) 19 (3.2)<br />

12/13/2009 8


Men's attitude about spousal use of<br />

Family Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Ile-Ife<br />

Approve<br />

89%<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Men's practice regard<strong>in</strong>g attend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

FP Cl<strong>in</strong>ics with Spouse, Ile-Ife<br />

Percentage<br />

80<br />

26<br />

Yes<br />

74<br />

No<br />

Ever attended FP Cl<strong>in</strong>ic<br />

Disapprove<br />

11%<br />

11%<br />

12/13/2009 9


Quotes from FGD Participants<br />

• “What will I do <strong>in</strong> a <strong>family</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ic, the place is<br />

not meant for men, it is ridiculous for men to be<br />

there, I will just give my w<strong>ife</strong> the necessary f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

support she needs” (Educated man, 30‐55 years).<br />

• “My husband has never accompanied me to <strong>family</strong><br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ic. He only gave me money for the<br />

method I decided to use” (Uneducated woman, 18‐<br />

30 years)<br />

12/13/2009 10


Table 2. Reported reasons for approval/disapproval of<br />

Spousal use of Family Plann<strong>in</strong>g Methods<br />

Male<br />

Fe<strong>male</strong><br />

Total<br />

Approve<br />

n=357 (%) n=186 (%) n=543 (%)<br />

Space Birth 255 (71.4) 124 (66.7) 379 (69.8)<br />

Achieve desired <strong>family</strong> size 72 (20.1) 36 (19.4) 108 (19.9)<br />

Avoid unwanted pregnancy 15 (4.2) 11 (5.9) 26 (4.8)<br />

Promote child health 7 (2.0) 12 (6.4) 19 (3.5)<br />

Improve quality of child care 7 (2.0) 2 (1.1) 9 (1.6)<br />

Marital bliss 1 (0.3) 1 (0.5) 2 (0.4)<br />

Total 357 (100) 186 (100) 543 (100)<br />

Male<br />

Fe<strong>male</strong><br />

Total<br />

Disapprove<br />

n=43 (%) n=14 (%) n=57 (%)<br />

Religion 19 (44.1) 3 (21.4) 22 (38.4)<br />

Side effects 14 (30.5) 3 (21.4) 17 (28.7)<br />

Encourage <strong>in</strong>fidelity 9 (20.8) 5 (35.8) 14 (24.3)<br />

Reason unstated 2 (4.6) 3 (21.4) 5 (8.6)<br />

Total 43 (100) 14 (100) 57 (100)<br />

12/13/2009 11


Utilization of Family Plann<strong>in</strong>g methods by <strong>male</strong> survey<br />

respondents <strong>in</strong> Ile-Ife<br />

Percentage<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

81.3<br />

18.7<br />

12/13/2009 12<br />

55.5<br />

Ever use Current use<br />

Yes No<br />

44.5


Initiator of discussion about reproductive issues among survey<br />

respondents<br />

Percentage<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

15.5<br />

9.5<br />

13.5<br />

13.4<br />

12/13/2009 13<br />

5<br />

20.5<br />

When to achieve pregnancy When to avoid pregnancy Use of contraceptives<br />

Men Women


Figure 5: Spousal Communication about Family Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the past Year<br />

Percentage<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

34.7<br />

38<br />

48.5<br />

40<br />

12/13/2009 14<br />

16<br />

Never Once/Twice Thrice<br />

No. of times Family Plann<strong>in</strong>g discussed<br />

22<br />

Male<br />

Fe<strong>male</strong>


Table 3. Family Plann<strong>in</strong>g providers’ perspectives on reasons<br />

why<br />

men do not patronize <strong>family</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g services, Ile‐Ife,<br />

Reason Percentage<br />

of providers<br />

Cultural norms 100<br />

Society perceives it as a woman’s bus<strong>in</strong>ess 100<br />

Religion dictates 100<br />

Men are self-centered 50<br />

Women are more <strong>in</strong>formed than men about it 50<br />

Men are less committed as <strong>in</strong>dividuals to the <strong>family</strong> 50<br />

12/13/2009 15


CONCLUSIONS<br />

• Men <strong>in</strong> Ile‐Ife possessed adequate knowledge<br />

of modern <strong>family</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g methods<br />

• Men’s attitude toward and practice of modern<br />

<strong>family</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g methods was fair<br />

• Level of spousal communication about <strong>family</strong><br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g was poor and the role of men <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g discussions about contraceptive use<br />

was equally poor<br />

12/13/2009 16


RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

• Based on the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of this study, the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g recommendations are made:<br />

– There is a need for more <strong>male</strong> targeted<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the mass media<br />

– Need to build partnerships<br />

– Hir<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>male</strong> service providers<br />

– Improved social market<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>family</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

commodities<br />

– Community‐based resource persons<br />

12/13/2009 17


ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

• Study respondents<br />

• Fellow researchers<br />

• O.A.U/J.H.U Bill and Mel<strong>in</strong>da Gates<br />

Partnership Program on Population and<br />

reproductive Health<br />

12/13/2009 18


THANK YOU<br />

12/13/2009 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!