Information briefs and risk analyses for species under consideration ...
Information briefs and risk analyses for species under consideration ... Information briefs and risk analyses for species under consideration ...
Generic objective 2: Risk to avoiding, remedying or mitigating any adverse effects of fishing on the aquatic environment. Analysis: The risk of adverse effects on the aquatic environment from catch of octopus under an open access regime is low due to the fact that there is almost no target fishery for the species. Some catches of octopus are taken by bottom trawl but only as a consequence of a target fishery for QMS species. Very little is known of the general habitat interactions or the marine ecosystem role of octopus. Severity of impact (low, medium or high) : 1 Likelihood of impact (low, medium or high): 1 Risk score (1-9) : 1 Generic objective 3: Risk to providing for utilisation of the stock or species that enables social, cultural and economic well-being. Analysis: Octopus is generally not targeted by commercial fishers but has some commercial value. The present port price of $1.53 may indicate there is a market for octopus, and this may be increasing as New Zealand’s population becomes more multicultural. Analysis of export data over recent years also indicates a rise in the export value of octopus. There is thought to be only a very small take of octopus by the customary and recreational sectors. Octopuses do have intrinsic value and contribute to biodiversity and sustainability of marine ecosystems. Severity of impact (low, medium or high) : Low Likelihood of impact (low, medium or high): Low Risk score (1-9) : 2 Objective(s) returning highest score: 1 Risk based on severity/likelihood (low, medium, high): Low 12
Immediacy and uncertainty risk analysis: Not applicable to this species Draft Risk Evaluation Is risk after severity/likelihood analysis HIGH? No Is risk after severity/likelihood analysis MEDIUM; and immediacy and/or uncertainty is MEDIUM or HIGH? No Is risk after severity/likelihood analysis LOW; or is risk after severity/likelihood analysis MEDIUM and immediacy and uncertainty are LOW? Yes - stock is in GROUP 3 13
- Page 1 and 2: Species under consideration for int
- Page 3 and 4: OCTOPUS Common name: Octopus Specie
- Page 5 and 6: charts is limited and therefore the
- Page 7 and 8: Figure 1: Comparison of reported la
- Page 9 and 10: Recreational fishery characteristic
- Page 11: Risk analysis and evaluation STOCK:
- Page 15 and 16: Environmental effects and protected
- Page 17 and 18: Table 2: Estimated catch of whelk (
- Page 19 and 20: Recommendation 20 Regardless of whe
- Page 21 and 22: Generic objective 2: Risk to avoidi
- Page 23 and 24: CARPET SHARK Class: Chondrichthyes
- Page 25 and 26: Growth, reproduction and recruitmen
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 3: Commercially landed catch
- Page 29 and 30: Table 2: Processed state percentage
- Page 31 and 32: Sources of Information Data Sources
- Page 33 and 34: Generic objective 3: Risk to provid
- Page 35 and 36: Associated species (bycatch and tar
- Page 37 and 38: Fishing Council record an average o
- Page 39 and 40: Generic objective 3: Risk to provid
- Page 41 and 42: also contributed nearly 9% to the t
- Page 43 and 44: Treaty settlement obligations 20 MF
- Page 45 and 46: Severity of impact (low, medium or
- Page 47 and 48: from observer data in the squid tra
- Page 49 and 50: Risk analysis and evaluation STOCK:
- Page 51 and 52: RATTAILS Introduction 1 Rattails (o
- Page 53 and 54: Biological information Morphology,
- Page 55 and 56: WHX (white grenadier) Landed state
- Page 57 and 58: Risk analysis and evaluation STOCK:
- Page 59 and 60: Additional risk analysis not applic
- Page 61 and 62: Redbait contributed 1% to the total
Generic objective 2: Risk to avoiding, remedying or mitigating any adverse effects of<br />
fishing on the aquatic environment.<br />
Analysis: The <strong>risk</strong> of adverse effects on the aquatic environment from catch of octopus <strong>under</strong> an open access<br />
regime is low due to the fact that there is almost no target fishery <strong>for</strong> the <strong>species</strong>. Some catches of octopus are<br />
taken by bottom trawl but only as a consequence of a target fishery <strong>for</strong> QMS <strong>species</strong>.<br />
Very little is known of the general habitat interactions or the marine ecosystem role of octopus.<br />
Severity of impact (low, medium or high) : 1<br />
Likelihood of impact (low, medium or high): 1<br />
Risk score (1-9) : 1<br />
Generic objective 3: Risk to providing <strong>for</strong> utilisation of the stock or <strong>species</strong> that<br />
enables social, cultural <strong>and</strong> economic well-being.<br />
Analysis: Octopus is generally not targeted by commercial fishers but has some commercial value. The present<br />
port price of $1.53 may indicate there is a market <strong>for</strong> octopus, <strong>and</strong> this may be increasing as New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
population becomes more multicultural. Analysis of export data over recent years also indicates a rise in the<br />
export value of octopus.<br />
There is thought to be only a very small take of octopus by the customary <strong>and</strong> recreational sectors.<br />
Octopuses do have intrinsic value <strong>and</strong> contribute to biodiversity <strong>and</strong> sustainability of marine ecosystems.<br />
Severity of impact (low, medium or high) : Low<br />
Likelihood of impact (low, medium or high): Low<br />
Risk score (1-9) : 2<br />
Objective(s) returning highest score: 1<br />
Risk based on severity/likelihood (low, medium, high): Low<br />
12