3. Strain, Christopher Barry. “Civil Rights and ... - Freedom Archives
3. Strain, Christopher Barry. “Civil Rights and ... - Freedom Archives 3. Strain, Christopher Barry. “Civil Rights and ... - Freedom Archives
had little to say about self-defense.~ The only way for the Panthers to incorporate theorists such as Bakunin into their own ideology, which exonerated violence in the name of self-protection, was to widen their definition of self-defense ; therefore, Huey Newton and Eldridge Cleaver found it relatively easy, in order to justify a violent response, to equate violence with any form of oppression or injustice 6~ It was this logic that transfornKd the Panthers' defensive violence into offensive violence. David Hilliard further explained Huey Newton's implementation of offensive violence . "Fear is what makes him [Newton) fight so desperately," he explained, "be so severe and extreme . He always jp1~j,~$ that what he does to you, you're going to do to him. So he beats you to it."~ The March 23, 1968, issue of The Black Panther made it clear, in capital letters, by dressing the police : HALT IN THE NAME OF HUMANITY! YOU SHALL MAKE NO MORE WAR ON UNARMED PEOPLE . YOU WQ.L NOT KILL ANOTHER BLACK PERSON AND WALK THE S1'ItEETS OF THE BLACK COMMUNTfY TO GLOAT ABOUT Tf AND SNEER AT THE DEFENSELESS RELATIVES OF YOUR VICTIMS . FROM NOWON,WINYOU MURDER A BLACK PERSON IN THIS BABYLON OF BABYLONS, YOU MAY AS WELL GIVE ff UP BECAUSE WE WILL GET YOUR ASS AND GOD CAN'T HIDE YOU. The Panthers exploded conventional notions of self-defense and rc-defined them to include retaliation and revenge. Mikhail Aleksandrovich Bakunin, Catechism of the Revolutionist (Oakland : Black Panther Party for Self-Defense, 196?), pamphlet, Bancroft Collection on Social Protest Movements, Bancroft Library, UC Berkeley. 6~For example, see note S2 . ~Hilliard, This Side of Glorv , 180 . 17 6
Simultaneously, they shouldered the burden of defending the black community of Oakland, and in doing so, transfornxd self-defense from a personal prerogative to a civic duty. With the ascendance of the Panthers, self-defense was no longer an individual act, but rather a collective measure of survival . Historically, civilians defending themselves and their families were exeaising what is at best a personal privilege serving only the particular interests of those defended, not those of the community at large ; but, as the Panthers understood it, self-protection w~ defense of the community . Without apparent consciousness of any difference, Panther rhetoric addressed issues of community defense as if it were only individual self-protection writ large . To illustrate, a cartoon by Emory Douglas depicted a Godzilla-sized black panther chasing a giant, white rat (wearing Uncle Sam's top hat) out of a black neighborhood as flames engulf the surrounding buildings. "DEFEND THE GHE'1T0," the caption boldly entreats~° Antagonistic toward their protectorate, white police officers in Oakland often failed to assume the primary responsibility of law enforcement : protection of the community. Only black citizens, such as the Panthers, could assume this responsibility. The Panthers' conceptualization of self-defense had a political dimension as well . Newton explained : To be political, you must have a political consequence when you do not receive your desires--otherwise you arc nonpolitical . When Black people send a representative, he is somewhat absurd because he represents no political power. He does not rcpc~esent land power because we do ~'i'he Black Panther (March 23,1968) . '°Philip S. Foner, ed ., The Black PantherS td . ed. (New York : Da Capo Press, 1995), 180 . 177
- Page 147 and 148: One thing is apparent in this year
- Page 149 and 150: mistake" ; the presence of the Deac
- Page 151 and 152: done:' Sims said, "we walked like m
- Page 153 and 154: he waa killedj, but I believe he wa
- Page 155 and 156: Events picked up across the border
- Page 157 and 158: they were bound to precipitate a ca
- Page 159 and 160: goals of the movement. A year later
- Page 161 and 162: Sellers noted that while King was f
- Page 163 and 164: things," he said. "Everybody want t
- Page 165 and 166: the group . For example, an intervi
- Page 167 and 168: "Understand, the Deacons don't repl
- Page 169 and 170: quest for black equality, and chang
- Page 171 and 172: self-defense denotation from the of
- Page 173 and 174: Lowndes County lies in the heart of
- Page 175 and 176: "take over the courthouse" with sub
- Page 177 and 178: On Monday, November 7,1966, the nig
- Page 179 and 180: do anything violent ."~s But as the
- Page 181 and 182: To Carmichael, the Deacons for Defe
- Page 183 and 184: their perception in the media, and
- Page 185 and 186: considered the Panthers "a living t
- Page 187 and 188: legislator from Piedmont, specifica
- Page 189 and 190: Seale, the police were the enforcem
- Page 191 and 192: They also displayed a propensity to
- Page 193 and 194: Newton viewed violence as not simpl
- Page 195 and 196: Williams, a Panther. "We'd read Nat
- Page 197: Newton, Seale, and Cleaver had all
- Page 201 and 202: The Deacons for Defense and Justice
- Page 203 and 204: "The army turned on itself . . . Th
- Page 205 and 206: defense. He believed that no ruling
- Page 207 and 208: formulating their own . Coincidenta
- Page 209 and 210: exposed the actions of some policem
- Page 211 and 212: think in terms of armed conflict."~
- Page 213 and 214: and his band waylaid the Cleveland
- Page 215 and 216: Epilog : TIK Only Tis+sd T1Ky Was "
- Page 217 and 218: action did so through a redefinitio
- Page 219 and 220: with police personnel who were ofte
- Page 221 and 222: lacks in West Feliciana Parish, Lou
- Page 223 and 224: evolutionary war in tenors of self-
- Page 225 and 226: everywhere a person goes, even insi
- Page 227 and 228: epresented a quantum leap in the ab
- Page 229 and 230: people carried themselves in public
- Page 231 and 232: There can be an exaggerated distast
- Page 233 and 234: demand. It never did and it never w
- Page 235 and 236: "anti-American diatribes of the ran
- Page 237 and 238: allowed both RAM and the RNA to use
- Page 239 and 240: United States was having." s~ Exasp
- Page 241 and 242: hammering home the notions of self-
- Page 243 and 244: to you, that did more good than non
- Page 245 and 246: SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ~~un~~r~ws a~
- Page 247 and 248: W"C~"Y//iO~ ~JYL7///~O{i California
Simultaneously, they shouldered the burden of defending the black community of<br />
Oakl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> in doing so, transfornxd self-defense from a personal prerogative to a civic<br />
duty. With the ascendance of the Panthers, self-defense was no longer an individual act,<br />
but rather a collective measure of survival . Historically, civilians defending themselves<br />
<strong>and</strong> their families were exeaising what is at best a personal privilege serving only the<br />
particular interests of those defended, not those of the community at large ; but, as the<br />
Panthers understood it, self-protection w~ defense of the community . Without apparent<br />
consciousness of any difference, Panther rhetoric addressed issues of community defense<br />
as if it were only individual self-protection writ large . To illustrate, a cartoon by Emory<br />
Douglas depicted a Godzilla-sized black panther chasing a giant, white rat (wearing<br />
Uncle Sam's top hat) out of a black neighborhood as flames engulf the surrounding<br />
buildings. "DEFEND THE GHE'1T0," the caption boldly entreats~° Antagonistic<br />
toward their protectorate, white police officers in Oakl<strong>and</strong> often failed to assume the<br />
primary responsibility of law enforcement : protection of the community. Only black<br />
citizens, such as the Panthers, could assume this responsibility.<br />
The Panthers' conceptualization of self-defense had a political dimension as well .<br />
Newton explained :<br />
To be political, you must have a political consequence when you do not receive<br />
your desires--otherwise you arc nonpolitical .<br />
When Black people send a representative, he is somewhat absurd because<br />
he represents no political power. He does not rcpc~esent l<strong>and</strong> power because we do<br />
~'i'he Black Panther (March 23,1968) .<br />
'°Philip S. Foner, ed ., The Black PantherS td . ed. (New York : Da Capo Press,<br />
1995), 180 .<br />
177