3. Strain, Christopher Barry. “Civil Rights and ... - Freedom Archives
3. Strain, Christopher Barry. “Civil Rights and ... - Freedom Archives 3. Strain, Christopher Barry. “Civil Rights and ... - Freedom Archives
Conceptions of Black Power wet+e hazy at best, downright confusing at wor:t.m Clearly, Black Power meant different things to different people. The press attached implications of violence to the phrase. Many whites saw Black Power as the bastard child of hatred and violence : a ploy to grab white power and resources and use them against whites. Carmichael observed, "to most whites, Black Power seems to mean that the Mau Mau are coming to the suburbs at night."21 But to him, Black Power entailed, at its most basic level, self-defense : From our viewpoint, rampaging white mobs and white nightriders must be made to understand that their days of free head-whipping are over. Black people should and must fight back . Nothing mo~+e quickly c+epels someone bent on destroying you than the unequivocal message : "O.K ., fool, make your move, and nrn the same risk I run-of dying."~~ 2°Stokely Carmichael and Charles V. Hamilton offered the most comprehensive (though still cloudy) interpretation of Black Power in Black Power(1%7); unfortunately, this book complicated what Black Power meant to the civil rights movement in the United States by incorporating Third World nationalist movements and ideology, and by defining Black Power in terms of international struggle . See Stokely Camuchael and Charles V. Hamilton, Black Power: The Politics of Liberation in America (New York : Vintage Books, 1967) . Other helpful works, written at the time, include Robert L. Scott and Wayne Brockriede, The Rhetoric of Black Power (New York: Harper and Row, 1%9) ; James H. Cone, Black Theology and Black Power (New York: The Seabury Press, l%9) . For white perspectives, sa Charles E. Eager, White Reflections on Black Power (Grand Rapids, Mich . : William B. Eerdmans, 1967) ; and Joseph C. Hough, Jr.,~~ Power and White Protestants : A Christian_ Response to the New Negro Pluralism (L.ondon: Oxford University Press, 1%8) . 2~Carmichael, quoted in Sitkoff, S~aale for Black Equa~itv, 202 . ~Carmichael, Black Power, 52. 158
To Carmichael, the Deacons for Defense and Jtutice provided an illustrative example . "The Deacons and all other blacks who resort to self-defense mpresent s simple answer to a simple question : what man would not defend his family and home from attack?"~ Black Power was indispensable in so far as "pride in being black proved invaluable in aiding blacks to discard the disabling self-helm inculcated by white culture."~ Most importantly, Black Power was an Afro-American expression of political and social empowerment, rather than an ideology of racial supremacy. It is worth noting that, for most activists, being pro-black did not mean being anti-white. Carmichael advised SNCC sympathizers wary of Black Power that they had to understand that the Afro-American wanted "to build something of his own, something that he builds with his own hands . And that is~anti-white . When you build your own house, it doesn't mean you tear down the house across the street ."~ A variety ofother interpretations sprouted up . For example, King wrote in WheK Da We Go From Here? : One of the greatest paradoxes of the Black Power movement is that it talks unceasingly about not imitating the values of white society, but in advocating violence it is imitating the worst, the most brutal and the most uncivilized value of American life . . . Violence has been the inseparable twin of materialism, the hallmark of its grandeur and misery. This is one thing about modern civilization that I do not care to imitate . ~b~' ,53 . 24Harvard Sitkoff, The Strua¢le for Black Eauality rev . ed . (New York: Hill and Wang, 1993), 202 . uCarmichael, quoted in Carson,~, 205 . King, Whet+e Do We Go From Here : Chaos orCommunity? (New York: Harper& Row, 1967), 64, 66 . 15 9
- Page 129 and 130: While his views on integration, whi
- Page 131 and 132: He summed up his speoch by doclarin
- Page 133 and 134: journalist, labeled them "the South
- Page 135 and 136: shifted from Jonesbom to 8ogalusa,
- Page 137 and 138: cost. The struggle for black equali
- Page 139 and 140: point, the Deacons had ban quietly
- Page 141 and 142: Under the aegis of their charter an
- Page 143 and 144: them ; they were attuned to the law
- Page 145 and 146: the head, causing a gash . Leneva T
- Page 147 and 148: One thing is apparent in this year
- Page 149 and 150: mistake" ; the presence of the Deac
- Page 151 and 152: done:' Sims said, "we walked like m
- Page 153 and 154: he waa killedj, but I believe he wa
- Page 155 and 156: Events picked up across the border
- Page 157 and 158: they were bound to precipitate a ca
- Page 159 and 160: goals of the movement. A year later
- Page 161 and 162: Sellers noted that while King was f
- Page 163 and 164: things," he said. "Everybody want t
- Page 165 and 166: the group . For example, an intervi
- Page 167 and 168: "Understand, the Deacons don't repl
- Page 169 and 170: quest for black equality, and chang
- Page 171 and 172: self-defense denotation from the of
- Page 173 and 174: Lowndes County lies in the heart of
- Page 175 and 176: "take over the courthouse" with sub
- Page 177 and 178: On Monday, November 7,1966, the nig
- Page 179: do anything violent ."~s But as the
- Page 183 and 184: their perception in the media, and
- Page 185 and 186: considered the Panthers "a living t
- Page 187 and 188: legislator from Piedmont, specifica
- Page 189 and 190: Seale, the police were the enforcem
- Page 191 and 192: They also displayed a propensity to
- Page 193 and 194: Newton viewed violence as not simpl
- Page 195 and 196: Williams, a Panther. "We'd read Nat
- Page 197 and 198: Newton, Seale, and Cleaver had all
- Page 199 and 200: Simultaneously, they shouldered the
- Page 201 and 202: The Deacons for Defense and Justice
- Page 203 and 204: "The army turned on itself . . . Th
- Page 205 and 206: defense. He believed that no ruling
- Page 207 and 208: formulating their own . Coincidenta
- Page 209 and 210: exposed the actions of some policem
- Page 211 and 212: think in terms of armed conflict."~
- Page 213 and 214: and his band waylaid the Cleveland
- Page 215 and 216: Epilog : TIK Only Tis+sd T1Ky Was "
- Page 217 and 218: action did so through a redefinitio
- Page 219 and 220: with police personnel who were ofte
- Page 221 and 222: lacks in West Feliciana Parish, Lou
- Page 223 and 224: evolutionary war in tenors of self-
- Page 225 and 226: everywhere a person goes, even insi
- Page 227 and 228: epresented a quantum leap in the ab
- Page 229 and 230: people carried themselves in public
Conceptions of Black Power wet+e hazy at best, downright confusing at wor:t.m Clearly,<br />
Black Power meant different things to different people. The press attached implications<br />
of violence to the phrase. Many whites saw Black Power as the bastard child of hatred<br />
<strong>and</strong> violence : a ploy to grab white power <strong>and</strong> resources <strong>and</strong> use them against whites.<br />
Carmichael observed, "to most whites, Black Power seems to mean that the Mau Mau are<br />
coming to the suburbs at night."21 But to him, Black Power entailed, at its most basic<br />
level, self-defense :<br />
From our viewpoint, rampaging white mobs <strong>and</strong> white nightriders must be made<br />
to underst<strong>and</strong> that their days of free head-whipping are over. Black people should<br />
<strong>and</strong> must fight back . Nothing mo~+e quickly c+epels someone bent on destroying<br />
you than the unequivocal message : "O.K ., fool, make your move, <strong>and</strong> nrn the<br />
same risk I run-of dying."~~<br />
2°Stokely Carmichael <strong>and</strong> Charles V. Hamilton offered the most comprehensive<br />
(though still cloudy) interpretation of Black Power in Black Power(1%7); unfortunately,<br />
this book complicated what Black Power meant to the civil rights movement in the<br />
United States by incorporating Third World nationalist movements <strong>and</strong> ideology, <strong>and</strong> by<br />
defining Black Power in terms of international struggle . See Stokely Camuchael <strong>and</strong><br />
Charles V. Hamilton, Black Power: The Politics of Liberation in America (New York :<br />
Vintage Books, 1967) . Other helpful works, written at the time, include Robert L. Scott<br />
<strong>and</strong> Wayne Brockriede, The Rhetoric of Black Power (New York: Harper <strong>and</strong> Row,<br />
1%9) ; James H. Cone, Black Theology <strong>and</strong> Black Power (New York: The Seabury Press,<br />
l%9) . For white perspectives, sa Charles E. Eager, White Reflections on Black Power<br />
(Gr<strong>and</strong> Rapids, Mich . : William B. Eerdmans, 1967) ; <strong>and</strong> Joseph C. Hough, Jr.,~~<br />
Power <strong>and</strong> White Protestants : A Christian_ Response to the New Negro Pluralism<br />
(L.ondon: Oxford University Press, 1%8) .<br />
2~Carmichael, quoted in Sitkoff, S~aale for Black Equa~itv, 202 .<br />
~Carmichael, Black Power, 52.<br />
158