26.10.2013 Views

3. Strain, Christopher Barry. “Civil Rights and ... - Freedom Archives

3. Strain, Christopher Barry. “Civil Rights and ... - Freedom Archives

3. Strain, Christopher Barry. “Civil Rights and ... - Freedom Archives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

attacks" ; broadly considered, it also concerns "fending off possible violation of rights." s<br />

It is fundamentally a matter of legal <strong>and</strong> ethical concern. The Model Penal Code, a<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ardized American legal reference drafted in 1962, declares that "the use of force<br />

upon . . . another is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is immediately<br />

necessary." 9 Throughout history, philosophers, legal scholars <strong>and</strong> even some pacifists<br />

have tended to agree that self-defense is permissible ; controversies surrounding it have<br />

centered on whether the impending violation was sufficient to trigger a legitimate<br />

response . Self-defense is traditionally understood as a legal defense of justification as<br />

opposed to a defense of excuse (insanity, for example); therefore, a person justified in<br />

self-defense who is otherwise guilty of an egregious wrongdoing such as murder has, in<br />

the eye of the law, done nothing wrong .<br />

Justifiable self-defense necessitates three considerations : imminence, necessity,<br />

<strong>and</strong> proportionality.° The attack must be imminent, which means that it is about to<br />

BGeorge P. Fletcher, "Domination in the Theory of Justification <strong>and</strong> Excuse,"<br />

Universit o ' sb rah Law Review 57 (Spring 1996) : 556 . I have adopted Fletcher's<br />

definition of self-defense as my own. The University of Pittsbur~ Law Review has<br />

devoted an entire issue to self-defense as related to battered women ; much of what I have<br />

learned about the modern legal aspects of self-defense stems from this source . See<br />

"Symposium : Self-defense <strong>and</strong> Relations of Domination : Moral <strong>and</strong> Legal Perspectives<br />

on Women Who Kill," University of Pittsburgh Law Review 57 (Spring 1996) : 461-824 .<br />

MModel Penal Code ~ <strong>3.</strong>04(1).<br />

'°For an overview of traditional self-defense doctrine, especially in relation to<br />

minorities, see Cynthia Kwei Yung Lee," Race <strong>and</strong> Self-defense : Toward a Normative<br />

Conception of Reasonableness," Minnesota Law Review 81(December1996): 377-398 ;<br />

see also "Symposium,"~E8 note S, <strong>and</strong> the Model Penal Code , supra note 7 . See also<br />

Suzanne Uniacke, Permissible Killing: The Self-Defenrc Justification of Hotticide<br />

(Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1994) .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!