26.10.2013 Views

Negro Digest - Freedom Archives

Negro Digest - Freedom Archives

Negro Digest - Freedom Archives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

white families and a much lower<br />

level of family "stability ." Black<br />

people were twice as likely as<br />

whites to be unemployed, and consequently<br />

they had much lower income<br />

levels than whites . Over a<br />

fourth of the black families fell into<br />

the lowest income category as compared<br />

to a fifth of the white families,<br />

and in the higher income categories<br />

the whites consistently outstripped<br />

the blacks .<br />

Some rather profound changes<br />

had taken place by 1965 . The fertility<br />

level of the blacks was much<br />

closer to that of the whites as a<br />

consequence of a slight rise in white<br />

fertility and a large drop in black<br />

fertility. Black families were still<br />

characterized by more "problems"<br />

than white families, however, as<br />

only 78 percent of all black youth<br />

under 18 were living with both parents<br />

as compared to 90 percent of<br />

the white youth . The most significant<br />

change was in the unemployment<br />

levels . Black men were still<br />

twice as likely as white men to be<br />

without employment, but black<br />

women had a much lower unemployment<br />

rate, than white women .<br />

Finally, there was a considerable<br />

equalization in the distribution of<br />

families by income levels . It is true<br />

that more black than white families<br />

were in the lowest income category,<br />

but the difference between<br />

the two groups was reduced greatly .<br />

On the other hand, the difference<br />

in the proportion of families in the<br />

highest income category was increased<br />

in favor of the whites, while<br />

90<br />

in the middle-range categories the<br />

black and white families were almost<br />

equitably distributed.<br />

The general point we have been<br />

trying to articulate in this discussion<br />

of middle- and low-income<br />

black families in Cleveland, and<br />

their comparison to white families,<br />

is in answer to the question : if<br />

things have been getting better for<br />

some black people in the Sixties,<br />

what does getting better mean?<br />

The data would suggest that middle-income<br />

black families are<br />

out-distancing low-income black<br />

families in Cleveland, so in relation<br />

to each other the absolute and relative<br />

situation of middle-income<br />

blacks is getting better and that of<br />

low-income blacks is getting worse .<br />

However, in a comparison of<br />

middle-income blacks to whites in<br />

the same area, the data are suggestive<br />

if not conclusive . In 1960,<br />

middle-income black families were<br />

in a rather unfavorable position as<br />

compared to white families . By<br />

1965, the situation had improved<br />

for two possible reasons : (1) Many<br />

white families had moved out of<br />

the city in flight from the influx of<br />

black people, and those whites who<br />

remain behind may fall into the<br />

lowest and highest income categories,<br />

and (2) black women carried<br />

a considerable portion of the income-producing<br />

activities of black<br />

families, thus making it possible for<br />

their families to exist in some reasonable<br />

comparison to the white<br />

families who remained in the area .<br />

The situation for black men as<br />

March 1968 NEGRO DIGEST

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!