26.10.2013 Views

Negro Digest - Freedom Archives

Negro Digest - Freedom Archives

Negro Digest - Freedom Archives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lacks are better off, but we must<br />

ask, better off in relation to what?<br />

Are they better off in relation to<br />

their previous situation, in relation<br />

to low-income blacks or in relation<br />

to whites in the same areas in which<br />

they live?<br />

Some limited data from Cleveland<br />

provide us with some tentative<br />

answers to what may be happening<br />

to black people in various parts<br />

of the large cities of the nation .<br />

While most of Cleveland's black<br />

population is generally found in<br />

nine neighborhoods, some black<br />

people live outside of these areas .<br />

In 1960, some 8 .9 percent of the<br />

black people in Cleveland lived outside<br />

of the black community area ;<br />

and in 1965, 15 .0 percent of the<br />

black people lived outside of this<br />

area . If we assume that, in general,<br />

those living away from the black<br />

community are middle-income people,<br />

and those within the community<br />

low-income blacks, we can compare<br />

some of the characteristics of<br />

these two groups of blacks, and<br />

then compare them to middle-income<br />

whites in Cleveland . The<br />

table lists some of the social and<br />

economic characteristics of these<br />

three groups in Cleveland for 1960<br />

and 1965 .<br />

In 1960, middle-income black<br />

people had a fertility ratio (the<br />

number of children under five for<br />

every 1,000 women aged 15-49 )<br />

much lower than that of low-income<br />

blacks, indicating that poor<br />

blacks had more children to care<br />

for and less money with which to<br />

NEGRO DIGEST March 1968<br />

do so than their more prosperous<br />

brothers . The proportion of children<br />

under 18 living with both parents<br />

gives some indication of family<br />

"stability," and here the middleincome<br />

blacks were also better off<br />

for a higher percentage of their<br />

children live in "stable" families .<br />

Furthermore, middle-income blacks<br />

had a full year more of completed<br />

school than did those in low-income<br />

areas .<br />

Although middle-income blacks<br />

have an employment rate lower<br />

than that of low-income blacks,<br />

both groups have high levels of employment<br />

. The difference between<br />

the two groups is most clearly seen<br />

in the income statistics . Middleincome<br />

blacks have a much lower<br />

proportion of families and the very<br />

low income category, and a higher<br />

proportion in the category of those<br />

families making from eight to fifteen<br />

thousand dollars per year .<br />

Therefore, the median income of<br />

the poor black families was only 86<br />

percent as much as the median income<br />

of the black families living<br />

outside of the black community .<br />

We can confidently say that in<br />

Cleveland in 1960 middle-income<br />

blacks were better off than lowincome<br />

blacks .<br />

By 1965, the fertility ratio for<br />

all black families had dec~ined considerably,<br />

but the middle-income<br />

blacks still had much lower fertility<br />

than low-income blacks . The<br />

proportion of "stable" families in<br />

two communities went in opposite<br />

directions ; it got worse for tire low-<br />

s~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!