Negro Digest - Freedom Archives

Negro Digest - Freedom Archives Negro Digest - Freedom Archives

freedomarchives.org
from freedomarchives.org More from this publisher
26.10.2013 Views

e done without some base of support which is controlled by the protagonists . This is, of course, a major question for those of us who favor the creation of a Black University and ought to be decided as soon as possible . But let me go on . There have always been persons among us who have argued that no black program of any kind should be placed in white schools . The people who make this argument generally believe that we should be setting up schools in the black community . And there are really few people who do not agree that this should be done . The problem here is that there are obstacles involved which many of us feel we are not presently geared to handle . Foremost among these is the aggressive recruiting activities being conducted among our people by major colleges and universities all over the West Coast . Whereas we could match the aggression (which is still minimal), we are in no position to match the lucrative aid and assistance packages that they are handing out . And until we have done a sufficient amount of ground work, we will not be able to compete with the "name" and prestige of these institutions, na matter how unearned and unjustified these "names" and their prestige are . And this is not a fact to be scoffed at . Indeed, recent efforts to force these same colleges and universities to deal with our needs have been seriously hampered by the lack of participation by many students who refused to get involved because they were afraid that "their money" would be cut off or that they would lose the "opportunity" of attending "big name" schools that they had always aspired to attend . We don't like this, but the average "brother" is still more entranced by the notion of attending "Cal" than he is about attending any school that we could get together in the community . This is a problem to which I see no solution until we have begun to be more realistic in our assessment of it . At Berkeley, we finally decided that the only way we could even hope to deal with this trend, and perhaps reverse the attraction syndrome of which so many students are victims, would be to set up some kind of black program that would act as a kind of "catch" mechanism . This is to say that we had no intention, at this point, of actually institutionalizing any Black Studies program in a white school . Instead, we hoped simply to have enough of a program to "catch" the minds and energies of those students who would surely come to Berkeley, and direct them to where they were really needed-the black community! We had no illusion that just getting black students into the black community was going to solve all-or any-of the problems there . On the contrary, we had actually experienced the fallacy of this notion . We had always encouraged students to go to the community and to offer service . Anytime we managed to get a few of them to actually do this, invariably the same problem would arise : they had no skills or experience that qualified them to deal 16 March 1970 NEGRO DIGEST

with the problems they found there . They were no different from the white social worker . All they did was remind the people that they had problems . But in most cases they could offer no solutions ; they could render no positive service, and this turned the people off . So we were aware that we not only had to "catch" people and direct them to the community-we were also aware that we had to give them something to take there . This was our thinking about the "catch" action and Black Studies at the time . Most important of all, perhaps, was that feature of our thinking on Black Studies which opposed its institutionalization . It was our belief that if such a program was institutionalized it would, at the same time, be de-radicalized and reduced to a purely academic experience . And we could see no good coming from an isolated, sterile dissection of the Black Experience . We refused to consider any program that would not have arms for action. Beyond this, our concerns centered around what happens to people who get caught-up in institutions . We imagined that it would be very easy for concern and enthusiasm to be replaced by indifference and complacency . We saw this as a real threat and made all kinds of arguments against it. We argued, for instance, that instructors working in the program should not be tenured . This, to us, was very important because we saw it killing two birds with one stone . First of all, a number of opportunists who valued the security and prestige of tenure would be discouraged from getting involved from the outset . And second, we would be able to purge the program from time to time of those influences which proved negative . We had not wanted to develop a program with any aspects of permanence . We wanted a program that we could pick up at any time, intact, and sit it down anywhere that we wished . And we were sure that we would have to do just that if the program effectively did what we wanted it to do . I have bothered to call the occasion of Bro . Moore's visit and some of the thinking that preceded it from memory because it sheds a great deal of light on what we were thinking and what was happening on the eve of the great stampede . We can see by this, rather vividly, how sometimes when we begin to move we abort the ideals of our initial intent . So how did we respond, at that time, to the proposed "College of Malcolm X"? Watch . Naturally ; because of our commitment to the creation of a major Black University in the South and our belief that most northern programs should be of the "catch" type, we were predisposed to believing that the proposed "College of Malcolm X" was a bad idea . Objections were both primary and secondary . The latter centered around what appeared to some of us to be an insidious, even if unconscious, attempt to "legitimize Malcolm X . Our concern about this was based on an unusual NEGRO DIGEST March 1970 17

with the problems they found there . They were no different from the<br />

white social worker . All they did was remind the people that they had<br />

problems . But in most cases they could offer no solutions ; they could<br />

render no positive service, and this turned the people off . So we were<br />

aware that we not only had to "catch" people and direct them to the community-we<br />

were also aware that we had to give them something to<br />

take there . This was our thinking about the "catch" action and Black<br />

Studies at the time .<br />

Most important of all, perhaps, was that feature of our thinking on<br />

Black Studies which opposed its institutionalization . It was our belief<br />

that if such a program was institutionalized it would, at the same time,<br />

be de-radicalized and reduced to a purely academic experience . And<br />

we could see no good coming from an isolated, sterile dissection of the<br />

Black Experience . We refused to consider any program that would not<br />

have arms for action. Beyond this, our concerns centered around what<br />

happens to people who get caught-up in institutions . We imagined that<br />

it would be very easy for concern and enthusiasm to be replaced by<br />

indifference and complacency . We saw this as a real threat and made all<br />

kinds of arguments against it. We argued, for instance, that instructors<br />

working in the program should not be tenured . This, to us, was very<br />

important because we saw it killing two birds with one stone . First of<br />

all, a number of opportunists who valued the security and prestige of<br />

tenure would be discouraged from getting involved from the outset . And<br />

second, we would be able to purge the program from time to time of those<br />

influences which proved negative . We had not wanted to develop a program<br />

with any aspects of permanence . We wanted a program that we<br />

could pick up at any time, intact, and sit it down anywhere that we wished .<br />

And we were sure that we would have to do just that if the program effectively<br />

did what we wanted it to do .<br />

I have bothered to call the occasion of Bro . Moore's visit and some<br />

of the thinking that preceded it from memory because it sheds a great<br />

deal of light on what we were thinking and what was happening on the<br />

eve of the great stampede . We can see by this, rather vividly, how sometimes<br />

when we begin to move we abort the ideals of our initial intent .<br />

So how did we respond, at that time, to the proposed "College of Malcolm<br />

X"? Watch .<br />

Naturally ; because of our commitment to the creation of a major<br />

Black University in the South and our belief that most northern programs<br />

should be of the "catch" type, we were predisposed to believing that the<br />

proposed "College of Malcolm X" was a bad idea . Objections were<br />

both primary and secondary . The latter centered around what appeared<br />

to some of us to be an insidious, even if unconscious, attempt to "legitimize<br />

Malcolm X . Our concern about this was based on an unusual<br />

NEGRO DIGEST March 1970 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!