26.10.2013 Views

A model of integration - International Conference on Family Planning

A model of integration - International Conference on Family Planning

A model of integration - International Conference on Family Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <str<strong>on</strong>g>model</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>integrati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>: Postpartum<br />

family planning through a community<br />

based maternal and newborn program<br />

Salahuddin Ahmed,1 Rasheduzzaman Shah,1 Ishtiaq Mannan,1 Angela Nash-Mercado,2<br />

Peter Winch,1 Saifuddin Ahmed,1 Emma Williams,1 Nazma Begum,3 Ahmed Al-Kabir,4<br />

Robin Anth<strong>on</strong>y Kouyate,2 Catharine McKaig,2 Maureen Nort<strong>on</strong>,5 and Abdullah Baqui1<br />

1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Public Health; 2ACCESS-FP, Jhpiego; 3ICDDRB;<br />

4RTM <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g>; 5USAID/Washingt<strong>on</strong><br />

November 16, 2009


Background: Bangladesh and Sylhet District<br />

Unmet FP need<br />

Overall<br />

C<strong>on</strong>traceptive<br />

Prevalence Rate<br />

BDHS 2007<br />

BGD Syl<br />

18% 26%<br />

56% 31%<br />

Total Fertility Rate 2.7 3.7<br />

Sources: Bangladesh DHS 2007<br />

2


Birth Intervals<br />

Birth<br />

intervals<br />

< 24<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />

< 36<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />

Sources: Bangladesh DHS 2007<br />

Bangladesh Sylhet<br />

15.1% 26.1%<br />

36.9% 56.8%<br />

3


Study sites<br />

Sylhet district<br />

Zakiganj &<br />

Kanaighat subdistrict<br />

Interventi<strong>on</strong> area:<br />

4 uni<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Comparis<strong>on</strong> area :<br />

4 uni<strong>on</strong>s<br />

4


Study objectives<br />

To develop and test an integrated <strong>Family</strong><br />

<strong>Planning</strong>, Maternal and Ne<strong>on</strong>atal Health<br />

(FP/MNH) service delivery approach.<br />

To assess:<br />

the strengths and limitati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>integrati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

the impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the interventi<strong>on</strong> package<br />

<strong>on</strong> FP.<br />

the impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the interventi<strong>on</strong> package<br />

<strong>on</strong> pregnancy spacing.<br />

5


Study design<br />

Study sites: Eight uni<strong>on</strong>s in two subdistricts<br />

Interventi<strong>on</strong> uni<strong>on</strong>s: 4<br />

1 CHW for 4000 populati<strong>on</strong><br />

N<strong>on</strong>-Random Allocati<strong>on</strong><br />

in Sylhet district, Bangladesh<br />

Comparis<strong>on</strong> uni<strong>on</strong>s: 4<br />

1 CHW for 4000 populati<strong>on</strong><br />

Enrollment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> women during


Interventi<strong>on</strong> delivery strategy<br />

Strategic axis 1 Strategic axis 2<br />

Capacity Strengthening:<br />

Training, orientati<strong>on</strong><br />

HH level<br />

Community-based<br />

Advocacy and<br />

Behaviour Change<br />

Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

approach<br />

Community level<br />

Facility level<br />

7


Interventi<strong>on</strong> delivery strategy<br />

Household level by Community Health Worker<br />

One Community Health Worker for 4,000<br />

populati<strong>on</strong><br />

Pregnancy surveillance by CHWs (two<br />

m<strong>on</strong>thly rounds)<br />

Household visits during pregnancy (1 visit)<br />

and postpartum period (4 visits)<br />

Screen, dispense and Refer postpartum<br />

women to facility for postpartum care and<br />

c<strong>on</strong>traceptive methods<br />

8


Community Health Workers (CHWs)<br />

Young woman with<br />

grade 10 educati<strong>on</strong><br />

from the local<br />

community<br />

Training received:<br />

MNH: 21 days<br />

HTSP & LAM: 3<br />

days<br />

FP: 4 and 1/2 days<br />

9


CHW household counselling topics and<br />

timing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> visits<br />

Messages During<br />

pregnancy<br />

ANC √<br />

Newborn<br />

Care, EBF<br />

Integrated with MNH program Additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

Day 6<br />

postpartum<br />

Day 29-35<br />

postpartum<br />

√ √ √<br />

PNC √<br />

Return to<br />

fertility<br />

LAM and<br />

transiti<strong>on</strong><br />

M<strong>on</strong>th 2-3<br />

& 4-5 PP<br />

√ √ √<br />

√ √ √ √<br />

HTSP √ √ √ √<br />

√ √ √ √<br />

Visit to<br />

facility<br />

10


Community and facility level interventi<strong>on</strong><br />

delivery strategy<br />

One male and <strong>on</strong>e female<br />

Community Mobilizer for 20,000<br />

populati<strong>on</strong><br />

Advocacy meetings with<br />

community leaders, religious<br />

leaders, teachers and their<br />

wives<br />

Targeted male/female group<br />

meetings<br />

One-to-<strong>on</strong>e visits to develop role<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>model</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <strong>on</strong> LAM<br />

Interventi<strong>on</strong> delivery at health<br />

facility level by GOB/NGO<br />

Providers<br />

Postnatal care<br />

Counsel about FP methods<br />

including LAM<br />

Provide FP methods<br />

11


LAM and other c<strong>on</strong>traceptives use rate during<br />

PP 6 m<strong>on</strong>ths: from m<strong>on</strong>itoring data<br />

Parcentage<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

LAM and other c<strong>on</strong>traceptives use rate<br />

90%<br />

1%<br />

9%<br />

PP 29-35 days<br />

(n=1932)<br />

62%<br />

10%<br />

28%<br />

PP 2-3 m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />

(n=1293)<br />

Methods<br />

39%<br />

23%<br />

38%<br />

PP 4-5 m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />

(n=1021)<br />

LAM user Other methods user No method users<br />

12


C<strong>on</strong>traceptive use rate at 3 m<strong>on</strong>th postpartum<br />

(preliminary analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> half <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the cohort)<br />

Parcentage<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

26%<br />

0%<br />

8%<br />

20%<br />

Note: Active LAM users are those women who menti<strong>on</strong>ed they were using LAM as a<br />

method <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong>; passive LAM users are those who did not menti<strong>on</strong> using LAM<br />

as a method <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong> but they were exclusively BF their babies and their<br />

menses not returned at 3 m<strong>on</strong>th postpartum.<br />

15%<br />

12%<br />

51%<br />

Active LAM user Passive LAM user Other methods user No user<br />

Method<br />

Interventi<strong>on</strong> (n=1178) Comparis<strong>on</strong> (n=1261)<br />

68%<br />

13


C<strong>on</strong>traceptive use rate at 6 m<strong>on</strong>th postpartum<br />

(preliminary analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ¼ <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the cohort)<br />

Parcentage<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

21%<br />

0% 1% 0%<br />

23%<br />

18%<br />

55%<br />

Active LAM user Passive LAM user Other methods user No user<br />

Method<br />

Interventi<strong>on</strong> (n=597) Comparis<strong>on</strong> (n=638)<br />

82%<br />

14


Challenges<br />

Initially <str<strong>on</strong>g>integrati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> FP in MNH was not<br />

well accepted by MNH pers<strong>on</strong>nel<br />

Postpartum women mobility is limited<br />

Limited availability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> GOB services<br />

15


Less<strong>on</strong>s learned: Integrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> FP and<br />

MNH<br />

FP messages are well integrated into the MNH<br />

counseling curriculum<br />

Facilitates discussi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> family planning<br />

because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> focus <strong>on</strong> health outcomes<br />

Integrati<strong>on</strong> was feasible for CHWs workload<br />

Young, unmarried MNH CHWs were able to<br />

effectively deliver messages <strong>on</strong> family<br />

planning<br />

Did not adversely affecting the quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

MNH counseling<br />

Inclusi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> family planning is accepted by<br />

community<br />

16


Study partners<br />

Government <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Bangladesh<br />

ACCESS-FP<br />

Shimantik<br />

JHSPH<br />

17


This project is funded by USAID<br />

through ACCESS-FP <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jhpiego<br />

and GRA <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> JHSPH<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!