Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

25.10.2013 Views

provides an employer with the discretion to administer a pre-employment drug test anytime before the employee first performs a safety-sensitive function. FTA also believes the 90-day period is reasonable. It gives the employer the discretion to decide whether or not the covered employee is retained in the random pool during his or her absence. If the employee is retained in the random pool, then pre-employment testing is not required. In determining whether to retain the employee in the random pool, one consideration is the likelihood of the employee’s return to perform safety-sensitive functions. B. Pre-Employment Alcohol Testing (§655.42). FTA noted in the NPRM that its pre-employment alcohol testing requirements were suspended due to a court decision and subsequent legislation. Most commenters indicated that FTA’s new rule should also omit the pre-employment alcohol testing provisions, primarily because alcohol consumption is a legal activity. Others indicated that since pre-employment testing would not be conducted under FTA authority, this section should not be included in the final rule. FTA Response. The NPRM language is included in the final rule to conform with the other DOT agency drug and alcohol testing programs. All six DOT agencies with testing programs are adding this section to their respective rules. This section allows, but does not require, employers to conduct pre-employment alcohol testing. If an employer chooses to conduct pre-employment alcohol testing, the employer must conduct the testing in accordance with all of the requirements of 49 CFR Part 40. C. Reasonable Suspicion Testing (§ 655.43) 19

Several commenters responding to this section indicated that FTA should not interfere with an employer’s ability to require two or more trained supervisors to participate and/or agree on referring an employee for reasonable suspicion testing. One commenter indicated that employers should be allowed to authorize other personnel to make reasonable suspicion testing observations similar to the FMCSA. Two commenters indicated that this testing requirement should not be required at all because the consumption of alcohol is legal. Other commenters indicated that provisions found in 49 CFR 654.37(c) and (d) should be incorporated in the final rule. FTA Response. FTA believes that the public safety interest is furthered with the inclusion of this requirement and the final rule is amended to include the language of 49 CFR 654.37(c) and (d). FTA also notes that the proposed bar to an employer requiring two or more trained supervisors to make such referrals is not included in the final rule. FTA also agrees that an employer should be permitted to authorize and train other company officers to make reasonable suspicion observations; therefore this section and section 655.14 of subpart B are amended accordingly. D. Post-Accident Testing (§ 655.44). FTA noted in the NPRM that its post-accident testing regulation was previously amended to allow an employer, in extremely limited circumstances, to use the post- accident test results administered by local law enforcement only when the employer is unable to perform a post-accident test within the required time frame. Of the few comments received on this section, most indicated support for the limited exception to use post-accident test results from local law enforcement. However, 20

Several commenters responding to this section indicated that FTA should not<br />

interfere with an employer’s ability to require two or more trained supervisors to<br />

participate and/or agree on referring an employee for reasonable suspicion testing. One<br />

commenter indicated that employers should be allowed to authorize other personnel to<br />

make reasonable suspicion testing observations similar to the FMCSA. Two commenters<br />

indicated that this testing requirement should not be required at all because the<br />

consumption of alcohol is legal. Other commenters indicated that provisions found in 49<br />

CFR 654.37(c) and (d) should be incorporated in the final rule.<br />

FTA Response. FTA believes that the public safety interest is furthered with the<br />

inclusion of this requirement and the final rule is amended to include the language of 49<br />

CFR 654.37(c) and (d). FTA also notes that the proposed bar to an employer requiring<br />

two or more trained supervisors to make such referrals is not included in the final rule.<br />

FTA also agrees that an employer should be permitted to authorize and train other<br />

company officers to make reasonable suspicion observations; therefore this section and<br />

section 655.14 of subpart B are amended accordingly.<br />

D. Post-Accident Testing (§ 655.44).<br />

FTA noted in the NPRM that its post-accident testing regulation was previously<br />

amended to allow an employer, in extremely limited circumstances, to use the post-<br />

accident test results administered by local law enforcement only when the employer is<br />

unable to perform a post-accident test within the required time frame.<br />

Of the few comments received on this section, most indicated support for the<br />

limited exception to use post-accident test results from local law enforcement. However,<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!