Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

25.10.2013 Views

ecommended that FTA impose schedules for when the employee and supervisor training requirement should occur and the frequency with which it should be scheduled. FTA Response. FTA believes that simplifying the contents required in the Policy Statement reduces the administrative burden while maintaining an employer’s discretion to craft a Policy Statement that includes additional requirements not mandated by FTA. FTA also believes that it would be an undue burden to mandate an industry-wide training schedule. The final rule recognizes the diversity of employee-management relationships within the transit industry and also strikes a reasonable balance with the requirement for employee and supervisor training. However, a grantee may choose to include additional requirements not mandated by FTA, i.e., recurring training and employee rights. If a grantee does so, the grantee’s policy shall indicate that those additional requirements are the employer’s, and not FTA’s. FTA also believes that it is reasonable for employers to incorporate by reference 49 CFR Part 40 in their Policy Statements and make it available for review by employees when requested. Subpart E – Types of Testing A. Pre-employment Drug Testing (§655.41). FTA notified the public of the intent to eliminate the phrase “hire” in this provision of the rule. Previously, employers were required to administer a drug test and receive a negative result before hiring an employee. FTA also notified the public of its proposal to require a pre-employment test for covered employees who are away from work for more than 90 consecutive calendar days and plan to return to a safety-sensitive function. It is FTA’s intent that employers assure 17

themselves that employees can successfully pass a drug test before returning them to safety-sensitive functions. The majority of commenters support the change in the provision that allows a covered employee to be hired prior to receiving a negative drug test result. These comments indicated that the rule balances the employer’s personnel concerns with the public safety interest by ensuring that the new covered employee is not permitted to perform a safety-sensitive function for the first time until a negative drug test result is received. However, one commenter stated that the public safety interest is better served by prohibiting the hiring of a covered employee prior to receiving a drug test result. Another comment indicated that FTA should adopt pre-employment provisions similar to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). Many commenters supported clarification of the rule regarding the time required to elapse before an absent covered employee should take another pre-employment drug test. A majority of rural and small urban employers are in favor of this rule because they employ seasonal and temporary workers. A few comments indicated that there is no basis to retest a covered employee after a 90-day absence. However, one employer indicated that a pre-employment test should be administered after 90 days regardless of whether the employee was in the employer’s random pool or not. Another commenter indicated that pre-employment testing should be administered following consecutive absences as short as 30 days. FTA Response. FTA has reviewed the comments and will incorporate the NPRM language into the final rule. FTA believes that deleting the phrase “hire” in this section 18

themselves that employees can successfully pass a drug test before returning them to<br />

safety-sensitive functions.<br />

The majority of commenters support the change in the provision that allows a<br />

covered employee to be hired prior to receiving a negative drug test result. These<br />

comments indicated that the rule balances the employer’s personnel concerns with the<br />

public safety interest by ensuring that the new covered employee is not permitted to<br />

perform a safety-sensitive function for the first time until a negative drug test result is<br />

received. However, one commenter stated that the public safety interest is better served<br />

by prohibiting the hiring of a covered employee prior to receiving a drug test result.<br />

Another comment indicated that FTA should adopt pre-employment provisions similar to<br />

the <strong>Federal</strong> Motor Carrier Safety <strong>Administration</strong> (FMCSA).<br />

Many commenters supported clarification of the rule regarding the time required<br />

to elapse before an absent covered employee should take another pre-employment drug<br />

test. A majority of rural and small urban employers are in favor of this rule because they<br />

employ seasonal and temporary workers. A few comments indicated that there is no<br />

basis to retest a covered employee after a 90-day absence. However, one employer<br />

indicated that a pre-employment test should be administered after 90 days regardless of<br />

whether the employee was in the employer’s random pool or not. Another commenter<br />

indicated that pre-employment testing should be administered following consecutive<br />

absences as short as 30 days.<br />

FTA Response. FTA has reviewed the comments and will incorporate the NPRM<br />

language into the final rule. FTA believes that deleting the phrase “hire” in this section<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!