Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
ecommended that FTA impose schedules for when the employee and supervisor training requirement should occur and the frequency with which it should be scheduled. FTA Response. FTA believes that simplifying the contents required in the Policy Statement reduces the administrative burden while maintaining an employer’s discretion to craft a Policy Statement that includes additional requirements not mandated by FTA. FTA also believes that it would be an undue burden to mandate an industry-wide training schedule. The final rule recognizes the diversity of employee-management relationships within the transit industry and also strikes a reasonable balance with the requirement for employee and supervisor training. However, a grantee may choose to include additional requirements not mandated by FTA, i.e., recurring training and employee rights. If a grantee does so, the grantee’s policy shall indicate that those additional requirements are the employer’s, and not FTA’s. FTA also believes that it is reasonable for employers to incorporate by reference 49 CFR Part 40 in their Policy Statements and make it available for review by employees when requested. Subpart E – Types of Testing A. Pre-employment Drug Testing (§655.41). FTA notified the public of the intent to eliminate the phrase “hire” in this provision of the rule. Previously, employers were required to administer a drug test and receive a negative result before hiring an employee. FTA also notified the public of its proposal to require a pre-employment test for covered employees who are away from work for more than 90 consecutive calendar days and plan to return to a safety-sensitive function. It is FTA’s intent that employers assure 17
themselves that employees can successfully pass a drug test before returning them to safety-sensitive functions. The majority of commenters support the change in the provision that allows a covered employee to be hired prior to receiving a negative drug test result. These comments indicated that the rule balances the employer’s personnel concerns with the public safety interest by ensuring that the new covered employee is not permitted to perform a safety-sensitive function for the first time until a negative drug test result is received. However, one commenter stated that the public safety interest is better served by prohibiting the hiring of a covered employee prior to receiving a drug test result. Another comment indicated that FTA should adopt pre-employment provisions similar to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). Many commenters supported clarification of the rule regarding the time required to elapse before an absent covered employee should take another pre-employment drug test. A majority of rural and small urban employers are in favor of this rule because they employ seasonal and temporary workers. A few comments indicated that there is no basis to retest a covered employee after a 90-day absence. However, one employer indicated that a pre-employment test should be administered after 90 days regardless of whether the employee was in the employer’s random pool or not. Another commenter indicated that pre-employment testing should be administered following consecutive absences as short as 30 days. FTA Response. FTA has reviewed the comments and will incorporate the NPRM language into the final rule. FTA believes that deleting the phrase “hire” in this section 18
- Page 473 and 474: Page 100 of 100 Finally, additional
- Page 475 and 476: 43946 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 477 and 478: 43948 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 479 and 480: 43950 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 481 and 482: 43952 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 483 and 484: 43954 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 485 and 486: 43956 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 487 and 488: 43958 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 489 and 490: 43960 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 491 and 492: 43962 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 493 and 494: 43964 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 495 and 496: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 497 and 498: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 499 and 500: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 501 and 502: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 503 and 504: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 505 and 506: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 507 and 508: 49 CFR Part 655
- Page 509 and 510: 2 Electronic access to this rule an
- Page 511 and 512: duty and follow-up testing under sp
- Page 513 and 514: When the drug and alcohol rules ini
- Page 515 and 516: the consequences for prohibited dru
- Page 517 and 518: Labor unions: 3 Trade associations:
- Page 519 and 520: FTA Response. FTA opts not to inclu
- Page 521 and 522: Since each employer uses its own te
- Page 523: Most of the commenters to this sect
- Page 527 and 528: Several commenters responding to th
- Page 529 and 530: service providers and the employer.
- Page 531 and 532: esponsibility of FTA transit funds
- Page 533 and 534: 26 Federalism assessment. However,
- Page 535 and 536: Part 655 - Prevention of Alcohol Mi
- Page 537 and 538: 655.52 Substance abuse professional
- Page 539 and 540: (b) This part must be read in conju
- Page 541 and 542: (2) The volunteer performs a safety
- Page 543 and 544: Refuse to submit means any circumst
- Page 545 and 546: An employer must have an anti-drug
- Page 547 and 548: part. (c) Specific information conc
- Page 549 and 550: (5) Phencyclidine. (c) Consumption
- Page 551 and 552: concentration less than 0.04. This
- Page 553 and 554: §655.43 Reasonable suspicion testi
- Page 555 and 556: 48 the reasons the alcohol test was
- Page 557 and 558: (c) Rates for drug testing. (1) Whe
- Page 559 and 560: annual percentage rate under this p
- Page 561 and 562: (a) Each employer shall require a c
- Page 563 and 564: 56 for evaluating and resolving pro
- Page 565 and 566: qualifying the supervisors to make
- Page 567 and 568: 60 (12) Number of covered employees
- Page 569 and 570: post-accident alcohol test indicati
- Page 571 and 572: equired to be maintained by this pa
- Page 573 and 574: (b) A certification must be authori
themselves that employees can successfully pass a drug test before returning them to<br />
safety-sensitive functions.<br />
The majority of commenters support the change in the provision that allows a<br />
covered employee to be hired prior to receiving a negative drug test result. These<br />
comments indicated that the rule balances the employer’s personnel concerns with the<br />
public safety interest by ensuring that the new covered employee is not permitted to<br />
perform a safety-sensitive function for the first time until a negative drug test result is<br />
received. However, one commenter stated that the public safety interest is better served<br />
by prohibiting the hiring of a covered employee prior to receiving a drug test result.<br />
Another comment indicated that FTA should adopt pre-employment provisions similar to<br />
the <strong>Federal</strong> Motor Carrier Safety <strong>Administration</strong> (FMCSA).<br />
Many commenters supported clarification of the rule regarding the time required<br />
to elapse before an absent covered employee should take another pre-employment drug<br />
test. A majority of rural and small urban employers are in favor of this rule because they<br />
employ seasonal and temporary workers. A few comments indicated that there is no<br />
basis to retest a covered employee after a 90-day absence. However, one employer<br />
indicated that a pre-employment test should be administered after 90 days regardless of<br />
whether the employee was in the employer’s random pool or not. Another commenter<br />
indicated that pre-employment testing should be administered following consecutive<br />
absences as short as 30 days.<br />
FTA Response. FTA has reviewed the comments and will incorporate the NPRM<br />
language into the final rule. FTA believes that deleting the phrase “hire” in this section<br />
18