Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
which are effective on August 1, 2001. This consistency is necessary in order to avoid overlap, conflict, duplication, or confusion among DOT drug and alcohol testing regulations. Unless this rule goes into effect immediately, there would be a 30-day period in which Part 40 would be in effect without FTA’s conforming amended final rule. Since the new Part 40 was published over seven months ago, affected parties have had ample time to prepare to implement the changes in Part 40 to which this rule conforms. I. Background The Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991 (the Act) mandated the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations to combat prohibited drug use and alcohol misuse in the transportation industry. (Public Law 102-143, October 28, 1991, FTA sections codified at 49 U.S.C. 5331). In December 1992, FTA issued two NPRMs to prevent prohibited drug use and alcohol misuse by “safety-sensitive” employees in the transit industry. In February 1994, FTA adopted drug and alcohol testing rules, which were promulgated at 49 CFR Parts 653 and 654. Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991 The Act requires FTA to issue regulations requiring recipients of Federal transit funds under 49 U.S.C. 5307, 5309, and 5311, and 23 U.S.C. 103(e)(4) to test safety- sensitive employees for the use of alcohol or drugs in violation of law or federal regulation. With respect to railroad operations, the Act allows FTA to defer to regulations issued by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). As a condition of FTA funding, the Act requires recipients to establish alcohol and drug testing programs. The Act mandates four types of testing: pre-employment, random, reasonable suspicion, and post-accident. In addition, the Act permits return-to- 3
duty and follow-up testing under specific circumstances. The Act requires that recipients follow the testing procedures set out by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The Act does not require recipients to follow a particular course of action when they learn that a safety-sensitive employee has violated a law or Federal regulation concerning alcohol or drug use. Rather, the Act directs FTA to issue regulations establishing consequences for the use of alcohol or prohibited drugs by individuals performing safety-sensitive functions in the transit industry. Possible consequences include education, counseling, rehabilitation programs, and suspension or termination from employment. In authorizing this regulatory scheme, the Act has pre-empted inconsistent State or local laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, standards, or orders. However, provisions of State criminal law, which impose sanctions for reckless conduct leading to actual loss of life, injury, or damage to property, are not pre-empted by the Act. Previous Action by FTA On December 15, 1992, FTA issued two notices of proposed rule making to prevent prohibited drug use and alcohol misuse (49 CFR Parts 653 and 654). (57 FR 59646 and 57 FR 59660). The rules established a process whereby safety-sensitive employees would be tested on a pre-employment, random, reasonable suspicion, post- accident, return-to-duty, and follow-up basis. In the December 1992 Federal Register notice, FTA stated that it was “considering combining the final FTA alcohol and drug testing regulations into one part 4
- Page 459 and 460: Appendix G to Part 40—Alcohol Tes
- Page 461 and 462: Page 88 of 100
- Page 463 and 464: Page 90 of 100
- Page 465 and 466: I. Employer: Company Name: Page 92
- Page 467 and 468: Page 94 of 100 The following form a
- Page 469 and 470: Section III. Drug Testing Data Page
- Page 471 and 472: Page 98 of 100 TIP ~ Even though so
- Page 473 and 474: Page 100 of 100 Finally, additional
- Page 475 and 476: 43946 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 477 and 478: 43948 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 479 and 480: 43950 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 481 and 482: 43952 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 483 and 484: 43954 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 485 and 486: 43956 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 487 and 488: 43958 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 489 and 490: 43960 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 491 and 492: 43962 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 493 and 494: 43964 Federal Register / Vol. 68, N
- Page 495 and 496: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 497 and 498: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 499 and 500: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 501 and 502: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 503 and 504: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 505 and 506: Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 250
- Page 507 and 508: 49 CFR Part 655
- Page 509: 2 Electronic access to this rule an
- Page 513 and 514: When the drug and alcohol rules ini
- Page 515 and 516: the consequences for prohibited dru
- Page 517 and 518: Labor unions: 3 Trade associations:
- Page 519 and 520: FTA Response. FTA opts not to inclu
- Page 521 and 522: Since each employer uses its own te
- Page 523 and 524: Most of the commenters to this sect
- Page 525 and 526: themselves that employees can succe
- Page 527 and 528: Several commenters responding to th
- Page 529 and 530: service providers and the employer.
- Page 531 and 532: esponsibility of FTA transit funds
- Page 533 and 534: 26 Federalism assessment. However,
- Page 535 and 536: Part 655 - Prevention of Alcohol Mi
- Page 537 and 538: 655.52 Substance abuse professional
- Page 539 and 540: (b) This part must be read in conju
- Page 541 and 542: (2) The volunteer performs a safety
- Page 543 and 544: Refuse to submit means any circumst
- Page 545 and 546: An employer must have an anti-drug
- Page 547 and 548: part. (c) Specific information conc
- Page 549 and 550: (5) Phencyclidine. (c) Consumption
- Page 551 and 552: concentration less than 0.04. This
- Page 553 and 554: §655.43 Reasonable suspicion testi
- Page 555 and 556: 48 the reasons the alcohol test was
- Page 557 and 558: (c) Rates for drug testing. (1) Whe
- Page 559 and 560: annual percentage rate under this p
duty and follow-up testing under specific circumstances. The Act requires that<br />
recipients follow the testing procedures set out by the Department of Health and Human<br />
Services (DHHS).<br />
The Act does not require recipients to follow a particular course of action when<br />
they learn that a safety-sensitive employee has violated a law or <strong>Federal</strong> regulation<br />
concerning alcohol or drug use. Rather, the Act directs FTA to issue regulations<br />
establishing consequences for the use of alcohol or prohibited drugs by individuals<br />
performing safety-sensitive functions in the transit industry. Possible consequences<br />
include education, counseling, rehabilitation programs, and suspension or termination<br />
from employment.<br />
In authorizing this regulatory scheme, the Act has pre-empted inconsistent State<br />
or local laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, standards, or orders. However, provisions of<br />
State criminal law, which impose sanctions for reckless conduct leading to actual loss of<br />
life, injury, or damage to property, are not pre-empted by the Act.<br />
Previous Action by FTA<br />
On December 15, 1992, FTA issued two notices of proposed rule making to<br />
prevent prohibited drug use and alcohol misuse (49 CFR Parts 653 and 654). (57 FR<br />
59646 and 57 FR 59660). The rules established a process whereby safety-sensitive<br />
employees would be tested on a pre-employment, random, reasonable suspicion, post-<br />
accident, return-to-duty, and follow-up basis.<br />
In the December 1992 <strong>Federal</strong> Register notice, FTA stated that it was<br />
“considering combining the final FTA alcohol and drug testing regulations into one part<br />
4