Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

25.10.2013 Views

The regulations also apply to any contractor who performs safety-sensitive functions for a recipient or subrecipient of federal assistance as defined above. Exempt are contractors of rural operators, including those that receive Section 5311 funding and operators that serve populations under 200,000 and receive funding through the Section 5309 discretionary capital funding program and the Section 5307 urban funding program, including Job Access. Some transit agencies could be affected by drug and alcohol testing regulations of more than one USDOT modal agency. These include transit agencies operating ferry boats, commuter railroads, or vehicles that require operators to hold Commercial Driver’s Licenses (CDLs). In those cases, FTA has coordinated responsibility with the other modal agencies to minimize overlapping requirements. U.S. Coast Guard. The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) will be deemed in concurrent compliance with the testing requirements of 49 CFR Part 655 when they comply with the USCG’s chemical and alcohol testing requirements. However, ferry operations will remain subject to FTA’s random alcohol testing requirements because the USCG does not have a similar requirement. Federal Railroad Administration. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and FTA have agreed that commuter railroad operators who receive FTA funds are exempt from compliance with FTA’s testing regulations. However, these operators must certify to FTA as specified in Section 655.83 that they are in full compliance with the FRA substance abuse regulations set forth in 49 CFR Part 219 for its railroad operations. A sample certification letter can be found in the Sample Documentation section at the end of this chapter. The recipient must follow Part 655 requirements for its non-rail safetysensitive operations, if any. Commercial Driver’s Licenses. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and FTA have agreed that transit agencies with safetysensitive employees holding CDLs are covered by the FTA drug and alcohol regulations. However, individual CDL holders remain subject to FMCSA sanctions and other ramifications for FMCSA rule violations, which are not included in the FTA drug and alcohol regulations (i.e., loss of CDL for one year following a positive alcohol test of 0.04 or greater). The regulations promulgated by each of the USDOT modes are very similar and address the same basic principles. However, the regulations are different in that they reflect the operating environment and regulatory authority unique to each mode. Since many transit systems are associated with other entities that fall under the FMCSA rule, they have assumed incorrectly that a program that is compliant with one modal administration’s regulation will also be in compliance with the other’s regulation. The regulations are similar, but they are not identical. The primary areas of difference between the FTA and FMCSA regulations are summarized in the Sample Documentation section at the end of this chapter. Chapter 2. Regulatory Overview 2-3 August 2002

What happens in these cases? The public transit industry is complex, representing a variety of operating environments, system designs, modes of operation, and organizational structures. As such, several issues have arisen regarding the applicability of the FTA regulations in different situations. The following guidance is provided on the most commonly raised of these issues. Contractors Covered Under the Regulations of Other Modes. Many transit systems contract with safetysensitive contractors who are already required to comply with the drug and alcohol testing regulations of other modes (i.e., FMCSA). If these contractors are able to segregate the employees who provide transit service from those who perform safety-sensitive functions for the other modes, the employer is required to establish programs for each group of employees allowing for the corresponding differences in the modal rules. However, if the contractor’s employees perform safety-sensitive functions for both transit and another mode, the employer must determine which modal administration regulates the majority (>50 percent) of the employees’ who perform safety-sensitive functions covered under the USDOT. Once determined, the employee will be subject to pre-employment and random testing under the regulatory authority of the primary modal administration. The assignment of regulatory authority for reasonable suspicion and post-accident testing will depend on the function an employee is performing at the time of the incident/accident. Return-to-duty and follow-up tests will be assigned to the modal administration that generated the initial positive test result. Brokerages and Human Service Agency Transportation Coordination. Agencies that provide several transportation programs under one umbrella such as a brokerage or a human service transportation coordination system need only test the public transportation component of the services as long as the services are distinctly separate. Specifically, if there is no intermixing of funds or personnel, the services are considered separate and the non-FTA funded transportation programs are not subject to FTA’s drug and alcohol testing rules. However, if the program is integrated, the service is provided under contract interchangeably, and/or the service is funded all or in part by federal transit funds, the service providers are included. The only exception is when the brokerage is set up as a user-side subsidy program where the passengers choose which service provider they will use. In this case, the service provider is exempt because the broker or agency has no contract with the service provider, and no control over the passengers’ decisionmaking. In situations where there is some minimal overlap of duties or shared responsibilities of staff (i.e., backup driver in an emergency, shared dispatcher), FTA considers this “incidental overlap,” and does not require coverage of the individuals performing the incidental job functions. Pass-Through Funding. In situations where a transit system serves only as a conduit to pass-through non- FTA funding to another transportation Chapter 2. Regulatory Overview 2-4 August 2002

The regulations also apply to any<br />

contractor who performs safety-sensitive<br />

functions for a recipient or subrecipient<br />

of federal assistance as defined above.<br />

Exempt are contractors of rural operators,<br />

including those that receive Section 5311<br />

funding and operators that serve<br />

populations under 200,000 and receive<br />

funding through the Section 5309<br />

discretionary capital funding program<br />

and the Section 5307 urban funding<br />

program, including Job Access.<br />

Some transit agencies could be<br />

affected by drug and alcohol testing<br />

regulations of more than one USDOT<br />

modal agency. These include transit<br />

agencies operating ferry boats, commuter<br />

railroads, or vehicles that require<br />

operators to hold Commercial Driver’s<br />

Licenses (CDLs). In those cases, FTA<br />

has coordinated responsibility with the<br />

other modal agencies to minimize<br />

overlapping requirements.<br />

U.S. Coast Guard. The U.S. Coast<br />

Guard (USCG) will be deemed in<br />

concurrent compliance with the testing<br />

requirements of 49 CFR Part 655 when<br />

they comply with the USCG’s chemical<br />

and alcohol testing requirements.<br />

However, ferry operations will remain<br />

subject to FTA’s random alcohol testing<br />

requirements because the USCG does not<br />

have a similar requirement.<br />

<strong>Federal</strong> Railroad <strong>Administration</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Federal</strong> Railroad <strong>Administration</strong><br />

(FRA) and FTA have agreed that<br />

commuter railroad operators who receive<br />

FTA funds are exempt from compliance<br />

with FTA’s testing regulations.<br />

However, these operators must certify to<br />

FTA as specified in Section 655.83 that<br />

they are in full compliance with the FRA<br />

substance abuse regulations set forth in<br />

49 CFR Part 219 for its railroad<br />

operations. A sample certification letter<br />

can be found in the Sample<br />

Documentation section at the end of this<br />

chapter. The recipient must follow Part<br />

655 requirements for its non-rail safetysensitive<br />

operations, if any.<br />

Commercial Driver’s Licenses. The<br />

<strong>Federal</strong> Motor Carrier Safety<br />

<strong>Administration</strong> (FMCSA) and FTA have<br />

agreed that transit agencies with safetysensitive<br />

employees holding CDLs are<br />

covered by the FTA drug and alcohol<br />

regulations. However, individual CDL<br />

holders remain subject to FMCSA<br />

sanctions and other ramifications for<br />

FMCSA rule violations, which are not<br />

included in the FTA drug and alcohol<br />

regulations (i.e., loss of CDL for one year<br />

following a positive alcohol test of 0.04<br />

or greater).<br />

The regulations promulgated by each<br />

of the USDOT modes are very similar<br />

and address the same basic principles.<br />

However, the regulations are different in<br />

that they reflect the operating<br />

environment and regulatory authority<br />

unique to each mode. Since many transit<br />

systems are associated with other entities<br />

that fall under the FMCSA rule, they<br />

have assumed incorrectly that a program<br />

that is compliant with one modal<br />

administration’s regulation will also be in<br />

compliance with the other’s regulation.<br />

The regulations are similar, but they are<br />

not identical. The primary areas of<br />

difference between the FTA and FMCSA<br />

regulations are summarized in the<br />

Sample Documentation section at the end<br />

of this chapter.<br />

Chapter 2. Regulatory Overview 2-3 August 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!