Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

25.10.2013 Views

Section 2. CONSIDERATIONS IN ESTABLISHING CONSORTIA Although there are many advantages, particularly for small transit operators, to establish consortia, the advantages have a “cost.” Consider those costs to your organization prior to establishing or joining a consortium and allow for the following: • Shared design • Reduced control • Financial considerations • Administrative burden Shared Design. Often, employers establish the consortium’s operating policies and procedures by consensus. This process enables the consortium to achieve its various goals while addressing the needs of its individual members, which will require some level of compromise. Consequently, you may need to compromise on some elements of your program design and conform to the design wishes of other consortium members. For example, you may join a consortium that provides services that comply with the FTA and DOT regulations, but may not provide other elements that you consider important (e.g., monthly random number selections rather than quarterly). Accordingly, you may need to contract for these services on your own, or settle for a less than optimum design. Reduced Control. By joining a consortium, each employer loses operational autonomy over its testing program. If you operated your own program, your agency’s DAPM would be solely responsible for its administration following policies and procedures under your sole control. This will not be the case in a consortium. As a result, it will be more difficult and time consuming to effect changes in the program. Conversely, the consortium may make changes that you do not agree with, but are powerless to avoid. In addition, timely services may be difficult to ensure, such as obtaining records or resolving problems. Your best protection against reduced control is a sound contract with the consortium. While you still may not be able to effect changes by yourself, you can ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. You might also limit the consortium’s ability to make changes without your approval and provide for prompt withdrawal if warranted. Financial Considerations. Although a consortium should reduce your substance abuse program costs, financial risks do exist. Failure of some consortium members to pay their costs may increase the burden on others under some consortia models. Consortia usually require a membership fee when you join, in addition to payments for testing services. This fee may include the provision of initial services such as policy development or educational materials. Charging a membership fee is a reasonable and common practice, and in virtually all cases the membership fee will be less than the initial investment of an in-house program. Nonetheless, the membership fee may be several times the cost of a single drug test, and small agencies that anticipate joining consortia should expect the fee and budget accordingly. Chapter 11. Joining a Consortium 11-5 August 2002

Members of a consortium that incorporate all of its members into a single random pool may not be able to anticipate the exact number of random tests that will be conducted on their employees. Even though the pool as a whole must meet the minimum criteria for drug and alcohol tests (50 percent for drugs and 10 percent for alcohol), individual employers may have more or fewer tests given the “luck of the draw.” For example, a transit system with 10 safety-sensitive employees would conduct 5 random tests if they were in a random pool of their own. However, this same system may conduct seven tests one year and two tests the next as part of a larger consortium. This uncertainty can make budgeting difficult. Shared Compliance. Each consortium member will impact the random testing rate compliance of the other members. If the consortium as a whole meets the criteria, then all members are in compliance. However, if the consortium falls short of the minimum requirements, then all members are out of compliance. Therefore, if you belong to a consortium with employers that do not conduct all their random tests, routinely purge their employee list, or communicate cancelled or omitted tests with the pool administrator, the consortium will not meet its goals and all members will be out of compliance. This risk can be minimized by aggressive program management and by establishing pools of like-minded employers. Administrative Burden. The amount of time and effort required to administer a consortium depends upon its size, type, and available expertise. Generally, consortia require a great deal of time to establish and maintain. The program requires the dedication and ongoing commitment of many people. Problem solving is a time-consuming task and requires significant effort by members. Also, a growing membership requires increased investments in administration and problem-solving efforts. Section 3. C/TPA LIMITATIONS The C/TPA and/or individual service agents may perform most tasks needed to comply with the regulations (see Exhibit 11-2 in the Sample Documentation section at the end of this chapter). The choice of which tasks will be delegated to a C/TPA, however, is left to the discretion of the employer. However, there are some limitations on the functions that a C/TPA or service agent can perform (§40.355). A C/TPA or service agent must not do the following: • Require an employee to sign a consent, release, waiver of liability, or indemnification agreement for any part of the drug or alcohol testing process covered by Part 40; • Act as an intermediary in the transmission of drug test results from the laboratory to the MRO; • Transmit drug test results directly from the laboratory to the employer--all employer interaction with the laboratory must be through the MRO; • Act as an intermediary in the transmission of alcohol test Chapter 11. Joining a Consortium 11-6 August 2002

Members of a consortium that<br />

incorporate all of its members into a<br />

single random pool may not be able to<br />

anticipate the exact number of random<br />

tests that will be conducted on their<br />

employees. Even though the pool as a<br />

whole must meet the minimum criteria<br />

for drug and alcohol tests (50 percent for<br />

drugs and 10 percent for alcohol),<br />

individual employers may have more or<br />

fewer tests given the “luck of the draw.”<br />

For example, a transit system with 10<br />

safety-sensitive employees would<br />

conduct 5 random tests if they were in a<br />

random pool of their own. However,<br />

this same system may conduct seven<br />

tests one year and two tests the next as<br />

part of a larger consortium. This<br />

uncertainty can make budgeting<br />

difficult.<br />

Shared Compliance. Each<br />

consortium member will impact the<br />

random testing rate compliance of the<br />

other members. If the consortium as a<br />

whole meets the criteria, then all<br />

members are in compliance. However,<br />

if the consortium falls short of the<br />

minimum requirements, then all<br />

members are out of compliance.<br />

Therefore, if you belong to a consortium<br />

with employers that do not conduct all<br />

their random tests, routinely purge their<br />

employee list, or communicate cancelled<br />

or omitted tests with the pool<br />

administrator, the consortium will not<br />

meet its goals and all members will be<br />

out of compliance. This risk can be<br />

minimized by aggressive program<br />

management and by establishing pools<br />

of like-minded employers.<br />

Administrative Burden. The<br />

amount of time and effort required to<br />

administer a consortium depends upon<br />

its size, type, and available expertise.<br />

Generally, consortia require a great deal<br />

of time to establish and maintain. The<br />

program requires the dedication and<br />

ongoing commitment of many people.<br />

Problem solving is a time-consuming<br />

task and requires significant effort by<br />

members. Also, a growing membership<br />

requires increased investments in<br />

administration and problem-solving<br />

efforts.<br />

Section 3. C/TPA<br />

LIMITATIONS<br />

The C/TPA and/or individual service<br />

agents may perform most tasks needed<br />

to comply with the regulations (see<br />

Exhibit 11-2 in the Sample<br />

Documentation section at the end of this<br />

chapter). The choice of which tasks will<br />

be delegated to a C/TPA, however, is<br />

left to the discretion of the employer.<br />

However, there are some limitations on<br />

the functions that a C/TPA or service<br />

agent can perform (§40.355). A C/TPA<br />

or service agent must not do the<br />

following:<br />

• Require an employee to sign<br />

a consent, release, waiver of<br />

liability, or indemnification<br />

agreement for any part of the<br />

drug or alcohol testing<br />

process covered by Part 40;<br />

• Act as an intermediary in the<br />

transmission of drug test<br />

results from the laboratory to<br />

the MRO;<br />

• Transmit drug test results<br />

directly from the laboratory<br />

to the employer--all<br />

employer interaction with the<br />

laboratory must be through<br />

the MRO;<br />

• Act as an intermediary in the<br />

transmission of alcohol test<br />

Chapter 11. Joining a Consortium 11-6 August 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!