Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

25.10.2013 Views

Employees are not to be given any advance notice. When developing a random testing program, you should establish a standard procedure and practice for notifying employees who have been selected. In scheduling tests, be careful not to provide any indication of when the testing will occur. Every effort should be made to provide the maximum privacy possible. Employees should be individually and discretely notified to report to the collection site. Assure those employees selected for testing that this is a routine random test. They should not feel that they have been singled out for testing for reasonable suspicion or for some other unstated reason. Flowcharts detailing the random testing process may be found at the end of this chapter. The FTA Random Drug Testing Manual, published in September 1991, describes the random selection process in detail. Consult this publication when choosing an approach to random testing, deciding when to test, and developing the selection and notification procedures. Section 5. RETURN-TO-DUTY TESTING Before any employee is allowed to return-to-duty to perform a safety-sensitive function following a verified positive drug test result, an alcohol result of 0.04 or greater, a refusal to submit to a test, or any other activity that violates the regulations, that employee must first be evaluated by a SAP and pass a return-to-duty test (§655.46, §40.285). This test and the SAP’s evaluation of an individual’s return-to-duty status provides some degree of assurance to the employer that the individual is presently free of alcohol and/or any prohibited drugs and is able to return to work without undue concern about continued substance abuse and public safety. Recommendation Random Testing One of the most sensitive types of testing is random testing. Indeed, if your system is challenged on a random test, you may be required to demonstrate that you are properly applying a valid random selection methodology. Small transit systems may be best served by contracting out the random selection process. Part of the responsibility that can be contracted out involves maintaining the random test pool by using unique identification numbers from each member system to update the pool membership. Because employees of all systems are pooled together, the pool is large enough that the predictability of the test is lessened. Likewise, since no manager at any of the transit systems is involved in the selection process (all selections are done in a controlled access area of the consortium management company), no employee need fear that he or she has been unfairly singled out for testing. Many alcohol or drug users are “polyusers;” that is, they use both alcohol and drugs. Therefore, the DOT regulations allow the employer to administer return-toduty tests for both drugs and alcohol, even though the original infraction was due to alcohol or drugs only. Before a return-to-duty test is performed, the employee must be evaluated by a SAP to determine if the employee has successfully followed all the recommendations for action by the SAP, including participation in any rehabilitation program. The SAP must recommend an education or treatment program in response to every referral. Chapter 6. Types of Testing 6-18 August 2002

Before making the return-to-duty recommendation, the SAP must obtain documentation from the recommended treatment program and confer with treatment professionals regarding the employee’s progress. The SAP must also conduct a face-to-face clinical interview with the employee to determine if the employee has complied with the recommendations. Based on input from the SAP, the returnto-duty decision must ultimately be made by the employer. If the SAP does not believe the individual has successfully complied with the recommended treatment program, the employer must not allow the employee to return to his/her safety-sensitive duties. See Chapter 9 for a more detailed discussion on the role of the SAP. Once the SAP has determined that the employee has successfully complied with the treatment recommendations and the employer has decided the individual can return to work, a return-to-duty test must be performed. The employee must have a verified negative drug test result and/or an alcohol test result of less than 0.02 to return to a safety-sensitive function. If a drug test result is cancelled, the employer shall require the employee to submit to and pass another drug test. If an employee is unable to provide a sufficient amount of urine to permit a returnto-duty drug test (i.e., 45 mL), the collector must follow the “insufficient volume” procedures defined in §40.193 and later described in Chapter 7. If when following these procedures, the employee is still unable to provide a sufficient specimen, the employer must direct the employee to obtain an evaluation from a licensed physician within 5 days. The physician must be acceptable to the MRO and have expertise in the field. The physician must ascertain whether there is a medical condition that with a high degree of probability precluded the employee from providing a sufficient amount of urine. Additionally, the physician must determine if the employee’s medical condition is the result of a serious and permanent or long-term disability. If so, the MRO or evaluating physician must determine if there is clinical evidence of illicit drug use. The MRO/physician may conduct an alternative test (e.g., blood test) as part of the medical evaluation. If there is no evidence of illegal drug use, the MRO must report the test result as negative, thereby allowing the employee to be assigned safety-sensitive duties. Figures 6-4 and 6-6 at the end of this chapter, illustrate the return-to-duty testing processes for alcohol and drugs. Section 6. FOLLOW-UP TESTING Required Testing Once allowed to return-to-duty, an employee shall be subject to unannounced follow-up testing for at least 12 but not more than 60 months. The frequency and duration Chapter 6. Types of Testing 6-19 August 2002

Before making the return-to-duty<br />

recommendation, the SAP must obtain<br />

documentation from the recommended<br />

treatment program and confer with treatment<br />

professionals regarding the employee’s<br />

progress. The SAP must also conduct a<br />

face-to-face clinical interview with the<br />

employee to determine if the employee has<br />

complied with the recommendations.<br />

Based on input from the SAP, the returnto-duty<br />

decision must ultimately be made by<br />

the employer. If the SAP does not believe<br />

the individual has successfully complied<br />

with the recommended treatment program,<br />

the employer must not allow the employee<br />

to return to his/her safety-sensitive duties.<br />

See Chapter 9 for a more detailed discussion<br />

on the role of the SAP.<br />

Once the SAP has determined that the<br />

employee has successfully complied with<br />

the treatment recommendations and the<br />

employer has decided the individual can<br />

return to work, a return-to-duty test must be<br />

performed. The employee must have a<br />

verified negative drug test result and/or an<br />

alcohol test result of less than 0.02 to return<br />

to a safety-sensitive function. If a drug test<br />

result is cancelled, the employer shall<br />

require the employee to submit to and pass<br />

another drug test.<br />

If an employee is unable to provide a<br />

sufficient amount of urine to permit a returnto-duty<br />

drug test (i.e., 45 mL), the collector<br />

must follow the “insufficient volume”<br />

procedures defined in §40.193 and later<br />

described in Chapter 7. If when following<br />

these procedures, the employee is still<br />

unable to provide a sufficient specimen, the<br />

employer must direct the employee to obtain<br />

an evaluation from a licensed physician<br />

within 5 days. The physician must be<br />

acceptable to the MRO and have expertise in<br />

the field. The physician must ascertain<br />

whether there is a medical condition that<br />

with a high degree of probability precluded<br />

the employee from providing a sufficient<br />

amount of urine. Additionally, the physician<br />

must determine if the employee’s medical<br />

condition is the result of a serious and<br />

permanent or long-term disability. If so, the<br />

MRO or evaluating physician must<br />

determine if there is clinical evidence of<br />

illicit drug use. The MRO/physician may<br />

conduct an alternative test (e.g., blood test)<br />

as part of the medical evaluation. If there is<br />

no evidence of illegal drug use, the MRO<br />

must report the test result as negative,<br />

thereby allowing the employee to be<br />

assigned safety-sensitive duties.<br />

Figures 6-4 and 6-6 at the end of this<br />

chapter, illustrate the return-to-duty testing<br />

processes for alcohol and drugs.<br />

Section 6. FOLLOW-UP<br />

TESTING<br />

Required Testing<br />

Once allowed to return-to-duty, an<br />

employee shall be subject to unannounced<br />

follow-up testing for at least 12 but not more<br />

than 60 months. The frequency and duration<br />

Chapter 6. Types of Testing 6-19 August 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!