,_ v - Fifth Court of Appeals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE OF CONTENTS IDENTITY OF THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL ....................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................. 3-4 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES .............................................................. 5-7 STATEMENT OF THE CASE .......................................................... 7-8 ISSUES PRESENTED ..................................................................... 8-9 STATEMENT OF FACTS .............................................................. 9-12 STANDARD OF REVIEW ............................................................... 12 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ....................................................... 12-13 ARGUMENT ........................................................................... 14-34 ISSUE ONE Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment against Appellant for fraud ....................................................................................... 14-20 ISSUE TWO Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment against Appellant for under an alter ego theory ............................................................... 20-22 ISSUE THREE Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment against Appellant for fraudulent transfer under the UFTA .................................................. 22-27 APPELLANT'S BRIEF 3
ISSUE FOUR Whether the damages awarded for fraudulent transfer are erroneous under the UFTA and result in an improper double recovery for Appellee .................. 27-29 ISSUE FIVE Whether the trial court erred when it awarded $61,848.47 in trial attorney's fees and $25,000.00 and $15,000.00 in appellate attorney's fees under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act ............................................................... 29-33 ISSUE SIX Whether prejudgment interest was calculated using an incorrect rate <strong>of</strong> prejudgment and postjudgment interest. ............................................ .33-34 CONCLUSION AND PRAYER ...................................................... 34-35 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ............................................................ .3 7 APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................. .38 TAB 1 JUDGMENT DATED AUGUST 5, 2011 APPELLANT'S BRIEF 4
Page 1 and 2: - .. .,_ I Ill • IN THE COURT OF
Page 3: APPELLANT: JOSEPH FABIANI APPELLEE:
Page 7 and 8: Lucas v. Texas Indus., Inc., ......
Page 9 and 10: Disposition: The trial court grante
Page 11 and 12: The Note was not personally guarant
Page 13 and 14: transfer."). CR. 192. The Judgment
Page 15 and 16: ISSUE ONE ARGUMENT Whether the tria
Page 17 and 18: Argument Appellee's Motion for Part
Page 19 and 20: • No evidence of any representati
Page 21 and 22: fraud was erroneous. Limestone Prod
Page 23 and 24: i I, theory of liability for actual
Page 25 and 26: ,. City of Houston v. Clear Creek B
Page 27 and 28: (8) the value of the consideration
Page 29 and 30: A creditor may also recover a money
Page 31 and 32: As shown herein, the UFTA claim awa
Page 33 and 34: The Gentry Affidavit does not conta
Page 35 and 36: I' applies to judgments on a contra
Page 38 and 39: II /,> CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This
Page 40 and 41: ·•
Page 42: Jr. recover from Defendants Joseph

,_ v - Fifth Court of Appeals

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?