You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
not prove actual fraud and there were no findings <strong>of</strong> any underlying corporate<br />
liability. Appellee also failed to prove the required elements <strong>of</strong> fraudulent<br />
transfer. The attorney's fees award was improper, because Appellee failed to<br />
present evidence <strong>of</strong> a lodestar analysis <strong>of</strong> attorney's fees claimed, failed to<br />
segregate attorney's fees, and presented zero evidence <strong>of</strong> anticipated appellate<br />
attorney's fees. Finally, Judgment used the incorrect interest rate under the Texas<br />
Finance Code and also awarded more damages than allowable under the Uniform<br />
Fraudulent Transfer Act.<br />
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant requests that this<br />
appeal be set for oral argument and that, upon hearing such argument, Appellant's<br />
point <strong>of</strong> error be sustained, and for such and further relief to which Appellant may<br />
be entitled.<br />
APPELLANT'S BRIEF<br />
35
Change language