Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012
Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012 Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012
AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch Figure 5.12 (reproduced from Richard et al. 2011 supplementary material): Captures and relative density of White-capped albatross (top) and Chatham petrel (bottom) showing large differences in the extent of distributions and overlap with fishing effort (in grey), and in the number of observed captures. The 97
AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch distribution base maps were obtained from NABIS (white-capped albatross) and the BirdLife single-layer range maps (Chatham petrel). Figure 5.13 (reproduced from Richard et al. 2011): Diagram of the modelling approach to calculate the risk index for each taxon. NBP, number of annual breeding pairs; N, total number of birds over one year old; NBPmin, lower 25% of the distribution of NBP; Nmin, lower 25% of the distribution of the total number of birds over one year old; rmax, maximum population growth rate; f, recovery factor; PBR, Potential Biological Removal; P, proportion of adults breeding in a given year; A, age at first reproduction; S, annual adult survival rate. 98
- Page 47 and 48: 4.2.2. Distribution AEBAR 2012: Pro
- Page 49 and 50: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 51 and 52: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 53 and 54: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 55 and 56: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 57 and 58: a b c d e f AEBAR 2012: Protected s
- Page 59 and 60: 4.4.4. Sources of uncertainty AEBAR
- Page 61 and 62: 4.6. References AEBAR 2012: Protect
- Page 63 and 64: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 65 and 66: 5.1. Context AEBAR 2012: Protected
- Page 67 and 68: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 69 and 70: 5.2. Biology AEBAR 2012: Protected
- Page 71 and 72: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 73 and 74: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 75 and 76: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 77 and 78: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 79 and 80: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 81 and 82: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 83 and 84: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 85 and 86: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 87 and 88: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 89 and 90: It included two goals that set the
- Page 91 and 92: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 93 and 94: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 95 and 96: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch T
- Page 97: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch t
- Page 101 and 102: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 103 and 104: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch
- Page 105 and 106: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch 5
- Page 107 and 108: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch 5
- Page 109 and 110: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch 5
- Page 111 and 112: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch m
- Page 113 and 114: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch l
- Page 115 and 116: Trend in interactions contd. AEBAR
- Page 117 and 118: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch B
- Page 119 and 120: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch O
- Page 121 and 122: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch T
- Page 123 and 124: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch S
- Page 125 and 126: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch 6
- Page 127 and 128: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 129 and 130: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 131 and 132: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 133 and 134: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 135 and 136: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 137 and 138: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch 6
- Page 139 and 140: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 141 and 142: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 143 and 144: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch 6
- Page 145 and 146: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 147 and 148: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Non-protected bycatch<br />
distribution base maps were obtained from NABIS (white-capped albatross) <strong>and</strong> the BirdLife single-layer<br />
range maps (Chatham petrel).<br />
Figure 5.13 (reproduced from Richard et al. 2011): Diagram of the modelling approach to calculate the<br />
risk index for each taxon. NBP, number of annual breeding pairs; N, total number of birds over one year<br />
old; NBPmin, lower 25% of the distribution of NBP; Nmin, lower 25% of the distribution of the total number<br />
of birds over one year old; rmax, maximum population growth rate; f, recovery factor; PBR, Potential<br />
Biological Removal; P, proportion of adults breeding in a given year; A, age at first reproduction; S,<br />
annual adult survival rate.<br />
98