Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012
Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012
Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Protected species: Seabirds<br />
Since publication of the NPOA in 2004, more progress has been made in the commercial fishing<br />
sector, including:<br />
• in the deepwater fishing sector;<br />
o industry has implemented vessel specific risk management plans (VMPs) comprising<br />
non-m<strong>and</strong>atory seabird scaring devices offal management <strong>and</strong> other measures to<br />
reduce risks to seabirds,<br />
o Government has implemented m<strong>and</strong>atory measures to reduce risk to seabirds (e.g.,<br />
use <strong>and</strong> deployment of seabird scaring devices), <strong>and</strong><br />
o industry has taken a proactive stance in resourcing a 24/7 liaison officer to undertake<br />
incident response actions, mentoring, VMP <strong>and</strong> regime development <strong>and</strong> reviewing,<br />
<strong>and</strong> fleet wide training;<br />
• in the bottom <strong>and</strong> surface long-line sectors, Government has implemented m<strong>and</strong>atory<br />
measures including tori lines, night setting, line weighting <strong>and</strong> offal management;<br />
• a number of research projects have been or are currently being undertaken by government <strong>and</strong><br />
industry into offal discharge, efficacy of seabird scaring devices, line weighting <strong>and</strong> longline<br />
setting devices; <strong>and</strong><br />
• workshops organised by both industry bodies <strong>and</strong> Southern Seabird Solutions are being held<br />
for the inshore trawl <strong>and</strong> longline sectors.<br />
Areas still requiring progress identified in MPI’s <strong>2012</strong> consultation documents for a revision to the<br />
NPOA-seabirds included:<br />
• development <strong>and</strong> implementation of mitigation measures, <strong>and</strong> education, training <strong>and</strong><br />
outreach in commercial set net fisheries <strong>and</strong> inshore trawl fisheries;<br />
• implementation of spatially <strong>and</strong> temporally representative at-sea data collection in inshore <strong>and</strong><br />
some HMS fisheries;<br />
• development <strong>and</strong> implementation of mitigation measures for net captures in trawl fisheries;<br />
• development <strong>and</strong> implementation of mitigation measures, education, training <strong>and</strong> outreach in,<br />
<strong>and</strong> risk assessment of non-commercial fisheries (especially setnet <strong>and</strong> line fisheries).<br />
Mitigation has developed substantially since FAO’s IPOA was published <strong>and</strong> a number of recent<br />
reviews consider the effectiveness of different methods (Bull 2007, 2009) <strong>and</strong> summarise currently<br />
accepted best practice (ACAP 2011). In December 2010, FAO held a Technical Consultation where<br />
International Guidelines on bycatch management <strong>and</strong> reduction of discards were adopted (FAO2010).<br />
The text included an agreement that the guidelines should complement appropriate bycatch measures<br />
addressed in the IPOA-Seabirds <strong>and</strong> its Best Practice Technical Guidelines (FAO 2009). The<br />
Guidelines were subsequently adopted by FAO in January 2011.<br />
The most important factor influencing contacts between seabirds <strong>and</strong> trawl warp cables is the<br />
discharge of offal (Wienecke <strong>and</strong> Robertson 2002; Sullivan et al. 2006, ACAP 2011). Offal<br />
management methods used to reduce the attraction of seabirds to vessels include mealing, mincing,<br />
<strong>and</strong> batching. ACAP recommends (ACAP 2011) full retention of all waste material where practicable<br />
because this significantly reduced the number of seabirds feeding behind vessels compared with the<br />
discharge of unprocessed fish waste (Abraham 2009; Wienecke <strong>and</strong> Robertson 2002; Favero et al.<br />
2010) or minced waste (Melvin et al. 2010). Offal management has been found to be a key driver of<br />
seabird bycatch in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> trawl fisheries (Abraham 2007; Abraham <strong>and</strong> Thompson 2009b;<br />
Abraham et al. 2009; Abraham 2010; Pierre et al 2010, <strong>2012</strong> a&b). Other best practice<br />
recommendations (ACAP 2011) are the use of bird-scaring lines to deter birds from foraging near the<br />
trawl warps, use of snatch blocks to reduce the aerial extent of trawl warps, cleaning fish <strong>and</strong> benthic<br />
material from nets before shooting, minimising the time the trawl net is on the surface during hauling,<br />
<strong>and</strong> binding of large meshes in pelagic trawl before shooting.<br />
89