Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012
Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012 Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012
AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seabirds Over the 2003 to 2011 period, there appear to have been downward trends (across all fisheries) in the estimated captures of all birds combined, white-capped albatross, and non-albatross taxa other than sooty shearwaters and white-chinned petrel (Figure 5.7). Estimated captures of other albatrosses, sooty shearwaters, and white-chinned petrel appear to have fluctuated without much trend, although there is some evidence for an increasing trend for white-chinned petrel, especially in trawl fisheries. Because fishing effort often changes with time, estimates of total captures may not be the only index required for comprehensive monitoring. The number of captures (with certain caveats, see later) is clearly more biologically relevant for the birds, but capture rates by fishery may be more useful measures to assess fishery performance and the effectiveness of mitigation approaches. Dividing modelled catch estimates by the number of tows or hooks set in a particular fishery in each year provides catch rate indices by fishery. These are typically reported as the number of birds captured per 100 trawl tows or per 1000 longline hooks (Figures 5.8 to 5.10). Estimated captures 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 White-capped albatross 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sooty shearwater 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Other birds BLL SLL Trawl BLL SLL Trawl BLL SLL Trawl 83 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Other albatrosses White-chinned petrel All birds combined 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Figure 5.7: Model-based estimates of captures of the most numerous seabird taxa observed captured in trawl, surface longline, and bottom longline fisheries between 2002/03 and 2010/11. For confidence limits see Tables 3 and 4. Note this level of aggregation conceals any different trends within a fishing method (e.g., deepwater vs. inshore and flatfish trawl or large vs. small longliners). BLL SLL Trawl BLL SLL Trawl BLL SLL Trawl
AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seabirds For white-capped albatross, captures rates declined between 2002/03 and 2010/11, and especially up to 2006/07, in the major offshore trawl fisheries for squid and hoki (Figure 5.8) but showed no trend for inshore trawlers and increased for surface longliners targeting southern bluefin tuna. Together, these fisheries account for 82% of all estimated captures of white-capped albatross in these years. 1000 800 600 400 200 500 400 300 200 100 0 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 200 150 100 50 0 0 White-capped albatross captures and capture rates Captures Squid trawl: 39% of captures 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Inshore trawl: 26% of captures 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 SBT longline: 11% of captures 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Hoki trawl: 6% of captures 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Fishing year 84 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Capture rate 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Figure 5.8: Model-based estimates of captures (left panels) and capture rates (right panels, captures per 100 trawl tows or 1000 longline hooks) of white capped albatross in the four fisheries estimated to have taken the most captures between 2002/03 and 2010/11 (cumulatively, 82% of all white-capped albatross captures). Data version v20121101.
- Page 33 and 34: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Sea
- Page 35 and 36: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Sea
- Page 37 and 38: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Sea
- Page 39 and 40: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Sea
- Page 41 and 42: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Sea
- Page 43 and 44: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Sea
- Page 45 and 46: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 47 and 48: 4.2.2. Distribution AEBAR 2012: Pro
- Page 49 and 50: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 51 and 52: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 53 and 54: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 55 and 56: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 57 and 58: a b c d e f AEBAR 2012: Protected s
- Page 59 and 60: 4.4.4. Sources of uncertainty AEBAR
- Page 61 and 62: 4.6. References AEBAR 2012: Protect
- Page 63 and 64: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Fur
- Page 65 and 66: 5.1. Context AEBAR 2012: Protected
- Page 67 and 68: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 69 and 70: 5.2. Biology AEBAR 2012: Protected
- Page 71 and 72: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 73 and 74: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 75 and 76: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 77 and 78: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 79 and 80: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 81 and 82: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 83: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 87 and 88: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 89 and 90: It included two goals that set the
- Page 91 and 92: AEBAR 2012: Protected species: Seab
- Page 93 and 94: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 95 and 96: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch T
- Page 97 and 98: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch t
- Page 99 and 100: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch d
- Page 101 and 102: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 103 and 104: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch
- Page 105 and 106: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch 5
- Page 107 and 108: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch 5
- Page 109 and 110: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch 5
- Page 111 and 112: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch m
- Page 113 and 114: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch l
- Page 115 and 116: Trend in interactions contd. AEBAR
- Page 117 and 118: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch B
- Page 119 and 120: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch O
- Page 121 and 122: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch T
- Page 123 and 124: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch S
- Page 125 and 126: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch 6
- Page 127 and 128: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 129 and 130: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 131 and 132: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
- Page 133 and 134: AEBAR 2012: Non-protected bycatch F
AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Protected species: Seabirds<br />
For white-capped albatross, captures rates declined between 2002/03 <strong>and</strong> 2010/11, <strong>and</strong> especially up<br />
to 2006/07, in the major offshore trawl fisheries for squid <strong>and</strong> hoki (Figure 5.8) but showed no trend<br />
for inshore trawlers <strong>and</strong> increased for surface longliners targeting southern bluefin tuna. Together,<br />
these fisheries account for 82% of all estimated captures of white-capped albatross in these years.<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
0<br />
White-capped albatross captures <strong>and</strong> capture rates<br />
Captures<br />
Squid trawl: 39% of captures<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
Inshore trawl: 26% of captures<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
SBT longline: 11% of captures<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
Hoki trawl: 6% of captures<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
Fishing year<br />
84<br />
10.0<br />
8.0<br />
6.0<br />
4.0<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.12<br />
0.10<br />
0.08<br />
0.06<br />
0.04<br />
0.02<br />
0.00<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
Capture rate<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
Figure 5.8: Model-based estimates of captures (left panels) <strong>and</strong> capture rates (right panels, captures per<br />
100 trawl tows or 1000 longline hooks) of white capped albatross in the four fisheries estimated to have<br />
taken the most captures between 2002/03 <strong>and</strong> 2010/11 (cumulatively, 82% of all white-capped albatross<br />
captures). Data version v<strong>2012</strong>1101.