25.10.2013 Views

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.4.4. Sources of uncertainty<br />

AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Protected species: Fur seals<br />

Any measure of the effect of NZ fur seal mortality from commercial fisheries on NZ fur seal<br />

populations requires adequate information on the size of the populations at different colonies.<br />

Although there is reasonable information about where the main NZ fur seal breeding colonies exist,<br />

the size <strong>and</strong> dynamics of the overall populations are poorly understood. At present, the main sources<br />

of uncertainty are the lack of consistent data on: abundance by colony <strong>and</strong> in total; population<br />

demographic parameters; <strong>and</strong> at-sea distribution (which would ideally be available at the level of a<br />

colony or wider geographic area where several colonies are close together) (Baird 2011). Collation<br />

<strong>and</strong> analysis of existing data, such as that for the west coast South Isl<strong>and</strong>, would fill some of these<br />

gaps; there is a 20-year time series of pup production from three west coast South Isl<strong>and</strong> colonies, a<br />

reasonably long data series from the Otago Peninsula, <strong>and</strong> another from Kaikoura. Maximum benefit<br />

could be gained through the use of all available data, as shown by the monitoring of certain colonies<br />

of NZ fur seals in Australia to provide a measure of overall population stability (see Shaughnessy et<br />

al. 1994, Goldsworthy et al. 2003).<br />

Fur seals may forage in waters near a colony or haulout, or may range widely, depending on the sex,<br />

age, <strong>and</strong> individual preferences of the animal (Baird 2011). It is not known whether the NZ fur seals<br />

around a fishing vessel are from colonies nearby. Some genetic work is proposed to test the potential<br />

to differentiate between colonies so that in the future NZ fur seals drowned by fishing gear may be<br />

identified as being from a certain colony (Robertson <strong>and</strong> Gemmell 2005).<br />

The low to moderate levels of observer coverage in some fishery-area strata adds uncertainty to the<br />

total estimated captures. However, the main source of uncertainty in the level of bycatch is the paucity<br />

of information from the inshore fishing fleets using a variety of methods. Recent increases in observer<br />

coverage enabled fur seal capture estimates to include inshore fishing effort. Further increases in<br />

coverage, particularly for inshore fisheries, would provide better data on the life stage, sex, <strong>and</strong> size of<br />

captured animals, as well as samples for fatty acid or stable isotope analysis to assess diet <strong>and</strong> to<br />

determine provenance. Information on the aspects of fishing operations that lead to capture in inshore<br />

fisheries would also be useful to design mitigation.<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!