25.10.2013 Views

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Appendices: Past projects<br />

12.8. Other strategic policy documents<br />

12.8.1. <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Strategy<br />

New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Strategy was launched in 2000 in response to the decline of New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s indigenous biodiversity — described in the State of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s <strong>Environment</strong> report as<br />

our “most pervasive environmental issue”. It can be found on the government’s biodiversity website<br />

at:<br />

(http://www.biodiversity.govt.nz/picture/doing/nzbs/contents.html)<br />

The Strategy also reflects New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s commitment, through ratification of the international<br />

Convention on Biological Diversity, to help stem the loss of biodiversity worldwide. Strategic Priority<br />

7 of the strategy was “To manage the marine environment to sustain biodiversity”. Fishing practices,<br />

the effects of activities on l<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> biosecurity threats are identified as constituting the areas of<br />

greatest risk to marine biodiversity. Pertinent objectives <strong>and</strong> summarised actions from the strategy are<br />

as follows:<br />

Objective 3.1: Improving our knowledge of coastal <strong>and</strong> marine ecosystems (Substantially increase<br />

our knowledge of coastal <strong>and</strong> marine ecosystems <strong>and</strong> the effects of human activities on them,<br />

especially assessing the importance of, <strong>and</strong> threats facing, marine biodiversity, <strong>and</strong> establishing<br />

environmental monitoring capabilities to assess the effectiveness of measures to avoid, remedy or<br />

mitigate impacts on marine biodiversity).<br />

Objective 3.4: Sustainable marine resource use practices (Protect biodiversity in coastal <strong>and</strong><br />

marine waters from the adverse effects of fishing <strong>and</strong> other coastal <strong>and</strong> marine resource uses,<br />

especially maintaining harvested species at sustainable levels, integrating marine biodiversity<br />

protection into an ecosystem approach, applying a precautionary approach, identifying marine species<br />

<strong>and</strong> habitats most sensitive to disturbance, <strong>and</strong> integrating environmental impact assessments into<br />

fisheries management decision making.)<br />

Objective 3.6: Protecting marine habitats <strong>and</strong> ecosystems (Protect a full range of natural marine<br />

habitats <strong>and</strong> ecosystems to effectively conserve marine biodiversity, using a range of appropriate<br />

mechanisms, including legal protection, especially establishing a network of areas that protect marine<br />

biodiversity.)<br />

Objective 3.7: Threatened marine <strong>and</strong> coastal species management (Protect <strong>and</strong> enhance<br />

populations of marine <strong>and</strong> coastal species threatened with extinction, <strong>and</strong> prevent additional species<br />

<strong>and</strong> ecological communities from becoming threatened.)<br />

In addition to its annual reviews (http://www.biodiversity.govt.nz/news/publications/index.html), the<br />

<strong>Biodiversity</strong> Strategy was reviewed by Green <strong>and</strong> Clarkson at the end of its 5-year term. This review<br />

was published in 2006 (http://www.biodiversity.govt.nz/pdfs/nzbs-5-year-review-synthesis-report.pdf). Most<br />

relevant to this synopsis were their findings on Objective 3.4 (Sustainable marine resource use) where<br />

they cited “Moderate progress”. “The policy move towards adopting a more ecosystem approach to<br />

fisheries management should be encouraged <strong>and</strong> strengthened. We acknowledge, however, the<br />

difficulties associated with obtaining the necessary information to make this approach effective. There<br />

are links to Objective 3.1 <strong>and</strong> the need for a more coordinated approach to identifying priority areas<br />

for marine research.”<br />

317

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!