25.10.2013 Views

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Appendices<br />

reporting on RAG recommendations, conclusions <strong>and</strong> action items, <strong>and</strong> ensuring followup;<br />

<strong>and</strong> communicating with relevant MFish managers.<br />

27. The Chair is responsible for facilitating consultative <strong>and</strong> collaborative discussions.<br />

Decision-making<br />

28. The Chair is responsible for working towards an agreed view of the RAG members on their<br />

recommendations to the fisheries manager, but where that proves not to be possible then the<br />

Chair is responsible for determining the final recommendation. Minority views should be<br />

clearly represented in proposals in those cases.<br />

29. A record of recommendations, conclusions <strong>and</strong> action items will be circulated by e-mail after<br />

each meeting by the Chair.<br />

30. Each RAG round will be evaluated by MFish, with a view to identifying opportunities to<br />

improve the process. The Terms of Reference may be updated as part of this review.<br />

Non-disclosure agreements<br />

31. Participants may be asked to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement relating to documents that<br />

disclose cost details.<br />

Conflicts of Interest<br />

32. New Zeal<strong>and</strong> is a small country <strong>and</strong> fisheries research is a relatively limited market, even<br />

internationally. People with the necessary skills <strong>and</strong> knowledge to participate in this advisory<br />

process may also have close working relationships with industry, research providers <strong>and</strong> other<br />

stakeholders. This will apply to nearly all external members of a RAG.<br />

33. Participants will be asked to declare any “actual, perceived or likely conflicts of interest”<br />

before involvement in a RAG is approved, <strong>and</strong> any new conflicts that arise during the process<br />

should be declared immediately. These will be clearly documented by the Chair.<br />

34. Management of conflicts of interest will be determined by the Chair in consultation with<br />

Fisheries Managers, <strong>and</strong> approved by the Deputy Chief Executive, Fisheries Management<br />

prior to meetings commencing.<br />

Frequency of Meetings<br />

35. Relevant MFish managers, in consultation with the Chair of the RAG, will decide on the<br />

frequency <strong>and</strong> timing of RAG meetings.<br />

Documents <strong>and</strong> record-keeping<br />

36. Unless signalled by the Chair, all RAG documents (papers, agendas, formal records of<br />

recommendations, conclusions <strong>and</strong> action items) will be available to all interested parties<br />

through the Ministry of fisheries website (www.fish.govt.nz), except where confidentiality is<br />

required for reasons of commercial sensitivity (e.g. cost estimates).<br />

37. RAG documents will be distributed securely.<br />

38. Participants who use RAG papers inappropriately may not be invited to subsequent RAG<br />

meetings.<br />

313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!