Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012
Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012 Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012
AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity taxa were orders of magnitude higher on the continental shelf than on the slope or abyss plain, and shelf, slope, and abyssal samples were distinct from each other in multivariate analyses. Diversity, however, was comparable between shelf and abyssal sites and lowest on the slope. Bacterial diversity was highest in abyssal and slope samples, but abundance, biomass, production, and activity of all enzymes except proteinase, which was highest in the abyss, were significantly higher in shelf samples. Benthic mega-epifaunal community composition was more strongly correlated with depth and seabed current speed than either water column productivity or seasonal ice cover, indicating that local hydrodynamics and their influence on advection of primary production are more important in determining distributions across the shelf than are local variations in production. Fauna on the seamounts were distinct from all other samples and were comprised of both Antarctic and Southern Ocean species, including remarkable populations of a new hyocrinid species on Admiralty seamount (Bowden et al. 2011, Eléaume et al. 2011). Published research to date has provided new insights into the distributions of several taxonomic groups (Lörz et al. 2009) , raised questions about the history of the northern seamount fauna over evolutionary time (Bowden et al. 2011), and contributed to a meta-analysis of the relationship between productivity and diversity in the deep sea (Leduc et al. 2012). In combination with molecular phylogenies and existing data from around Antarctica, results from this project represent a major contribution to knowledge of the Antarctic marine ecosystem. Specific Objective 10: To describe trophic/ecosystem relationships in the Ross Sea ecosystem (pelagic and benthic, fish and invertebrates). Progress has been made on obtaining data from which to elucidate trophic relationships between organisms in the Ross Sector of Antarctica collected on the IPY-CAML survey in February–March 2008. Two methods have been used. First, 1081 stomachs from 22 species of Antarctic fish were examined and the contents of the full or partially-full stomachs (comprising 776 fish) were identified to 68 prey codes. Index of Relative Importance (IRI) has been calculated from these data and diet overlap between fish species is presented. Second, stable isotope and elemental composition analysis of samples were carried out for carbon and nitrogen. In total, nearly 2000 samples were analysed. Samples include: • Fish (N=662 muscle, N=377 liver samples, 22 species); • Cephalopods (N=193); • Pelagic invertebrates (N=407); • Benthic sediments (N=36); • Phytoplankton (N=92); • Benthic invertebrates (N=200 completed, 95 pending analysis); Results have already been used to assist in parameterising and validating the quantitative model of the food web of the Ross Sea (paper accepted by CCAMLR Science). Research on the shrinkage of Antarctic silverfish carried out as part of this objective has contributed to a paper presented to the Ministry of Fisheries Antarctic Fisheries Working Group and accepted for submission to the CCAMLR working group on fisheries assessment in September 2010 (Pinkerton et al. 2007, 2009a, 2009b). Specific Objective 11: Assess molecular taxonomy and population genetics of selected Antarctic fauna and flora to estimate evolutionary divergence within and among ocean basins in circumpolar species. Provide DNA barcoding for all fish and multi-cellular invertebrate species by sequencing reference specimens in conjunction with Canadian Barcoding Centre, for specimen identification in gut content, plankton, and in taxonomic and population genetic projects. DNA data sets generated for selected Ross Sea taxa were combined with parallel data sets generated by other Institutes in order to estimate divergence within and among regions in the Southern Ocean. High levels of divergence, indicative of cryptic speciation, were found in all 279
AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity major groups tested to date. Fishes: DNA sequencing of the COI gene revealed four well supported clades among the three recognized species of Macrourus in the Southern Ocean, indicating the presence of an undescribed species (Smith et al. 2011). A conclusion subsequently supported by meristic and morphometric examination of specimens with the description of a new species by McMillan et al. (2012). DNA barcodes also showed high sequence divergence among specimens of the slender codling Halargyreus johnsonii from New Zealand and the Southern Ocean, indicative of a cryptic species in this cosmopolitan species (Smith et al. 2011). A study of snailfishes collected during the IPY survey and from the toothfish fishery showed high species diversity with more than 34 Ross Sea liparid species in three genera; 18 of them new to science divergence (Stein 2012). Invertebrates: A combined NZ-BAS data set on the octopod genus Pareledone provided one of the largest barcoding studies on a Southern Ocean genus. Ross Sea specimens provisionally identified as Pareledone aequipapillae appeared in a discrete clade to specimens from the Antarctic Peninsula, with a barrier to gene flow to the west of the Antarctic Peninsula (Allcock et al. 2010). Large numbers of echinoderms have been tissue sampled and sequenced for COI and include the Asteroidea, Ophiuroidea, Echinoidea, Holothuroidea, and the crinoids (Dettai et al. in press). In the Ophiuroidea two dominant patterns emerged: a. widely distributed species showing shallow divergence by location and b. species with deeper divergence associated with location or depth, that represent cryptic species. A similar pattern emerged in the smaller set of Asteroid sequences, with deep divergences within some Ross Sea taxa. Preliminary results for the amphipod genus Rhacotropis showed 5 well supported clades, indicative of cryptic taxa; while for the genus Epimeria (27 specimens from the Ross Sea) there were two well supported clades for specimens identified as Epimeria robusta, and likewise for specimens identified as E. schiaparelli, indicative of cryptic taxa (Lörz 2009, 2010, Lörz et al. in press). These taxa show shallow morphological differences. IPY2007-02 NZ IPY-CAML Cephalopoda. This project will report on the diversity of Antarctic Cephalopoda (Octopus and Squid), including a complete inventory of taxa, and reports on ontogenetic and sexual variation in species, their systematics, diversity, distribution, life histories, and trophic importance. A MAppSc thesis has been completed as part of this project (Garcia 2010). Other research relevant or specifically linked to the projects above, are listed in Table 11.8. Table 11.8: Other research linked to MPI Ross Sea Antarctica biodiversity programme. MPI ANT2011-01 Stock modelling, fishery effects and ecosystems of the Ross Sea MBIE C01X1001 Protecting Ross Sea Ecosystems. Comparative distribution and ecology of Macrourus caml and M. whitsoni in the Ross Sea region; feeding relationships of fish species in the Ross Sea region; Spatial processes, including spatial marine protection; Ecosystem modelling of the Ross Sea region).(Pinkerton et al. 2012a,b; Murphy et al. 2012) DOC Leigh Torres NIWA/Alison OTHER Universities NIWA;Lincoln, Canterbury, Otago, Auckland, Waikato EMERGING ISSUES Coastal research and functional ecology-ongoing need Taxonomic issues for fish and invertebrates (from IPY)ANT 2005-02 Water samples from throughout water column to assess microbial content (from IPY) check with Els 280
- Page 229 and 230: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity THE
- Page 231 and 232: MPI Research (current) NZ Research
- Page 233 and 234: 11.1.2. Defining biodiversity AEBAR
- Page 235 and 236: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity Mar
- Page 237 and 238: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity New
- Page 239 and 240: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity •
- Page 241 and 242: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity Fig
- Page 243 and 244: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity 11.
- Page 245 and 246: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity sta
- Page 247 and 248: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity to
- Page 249 and 250: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity ACH
- Page 251 and 252: Progression of research understandi
- Page 253 and 254: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity and
- Page 255 and 256: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity Sur
- Page 257 and 258: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity wor
- Page 259 and 260: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity dat
- Page 261 and 262: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity Ove
- Page 263 and 264: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity and
- Page 265 and 266: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity 11.
- Page 267 and 268: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity A n
- Page 269 and 270: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity aci
- Page 271 and 272: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity Pro
- Page 273 and 274: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity inv
- Page 275 and 276: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity Ros
- Page 277 and 278: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity Spe
- Page 279: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity spe
- Page 283 and 284: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity mod
- Page 285 and 286: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity iv)
- Page 287 and 288: 11.5. References AEBAR 2012: Marine
- Page 289 and 290: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity D
- Page 291 and 292: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity Lea
- Page 293 and 294: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity O'D
- Page 295 and 296: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity Thr
- Page 297 and 298: AEBAR 2012: Marine Biodiversity Tar
- Page 299 and 300: 12. Appendices AEBAR 2012: Appendic
- Page 301 and 302: AEBAR 2012: Appendices 14. To advis
- Page 303 and 304: AEBAR 2012: Appendices different co
- Page 305 and 306: AEBAR 2012: Appendices 12.3. Terms
- Page 307 and 308: AEBAR 2012: Appendices • To devel
- Page 309 and 310: AEBAR 2012: Appendices step aside f
- Page 311 and 312: AEBAR 2012: Appendices 12.4. BRAG a
- Page 313 and 314: AEBAR 2012: Appendices 15. While th
- Page 315 and 316: AEBAR 2012: Appendices 39. The over
- Page 317 and 318: AEBAR 2012: Appendices 12.7. OUR ST
- Page 319 and 320: AEBAR 2012: Appendices 12.8.2. Bios
- Page 321 and 322: AEBAR 2012: Appendices Policy 23: D
- Page 323 and 324: AEBAR 2012: Appendices 12.8.7. Nati
- Page 325 and 326: PROTECTED SPECIES AEBAR 2012: Appen
- Page 327 and 328: AEBAR 2012: Appendices: Past projec
- Page 329 and 330: PROTECTED SPECIES continued Project
AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Marine <strong>Biodiversity</strong><br />
taxa were orders of magnitude higher on the continental shelf than on the slope or abyss plain, <strong>and</strong><br />
shelf, slope, <strong>and</strong> abyssal samples were distinct from each other in multivariate analyses. Diversity,<br />
however, was comparable between shelf <strong>and</strong> abyssal sites <strong>and</strong> lowest on the slope. Bacterial<br />
diversity was highest in abyssal <strong>and</strong> slope samples, but abundance, biomass, production, <strong>and</strong><br />
activity of all enzymes except proteinase, which was highest in the abyss, were significantly higher<br />
in shelf samples. Benthic mega-epifaunal community composition was more strongly correlated<br />
with depth <strong>and</strong> seabed current speed than either water column productivity or seasonal ice cover,<br />
indicating that local hydrodynamics <strong>and</strong> their influence on advection of primary production are<br />
more important in determining distributions across the shelf than are local variations in production.<br />
Fauna on the seamounts were distinct from all other samples <strong>and</strong> were comprised of both Antarctic<br />
<strong>and</strong> Southern Ocean species, including remarkable populations of a new hyocrinid species on<br />
Admiralty seamount (Bowden et al. 2011, Eléaume et al. 2011).<br />
Published research to date has provided new insights into the distributions of several taxonomic<br />
groups (Lörz et al. 2009) , raised questions about the history of the northern seamount fauna over<br />
evolutionary time (Bowden et al. 2011), <strong>and</strong> contributed to a meta-analysis of the relationship<br />
between productivity <strong>and</strong> diversity in the deep sea (Leduc et al. <strong>2012</strong>). In combination with<br />
molecular phylogenies <strong>and</strong> existing data from around Antarctica, results from this project represent<br />
a major contribution to knowledge of the Antarctic marine ecosystem.<br />
Specific Objective 10: To describe trophic/ecosystem relationships in the Ross Sea ecosystem<br />
(pelagic <strong>and</strong> benthic, fish <strong>and</strong> invertebrates).<br />
Progress has been made on obtaining data from which to elucidate trophic relationships between<br />
organisms in the Ross Sector of Antarctica collected on the IPY-CAML survey in February–March<br />
2008. Two methods have been used. First, 1081 stomachs from 22 species of Antarctic fish were<br />
examined <strong>and</strong> the contents of the full or partially-full stomachs (comprising 776 fish) were<br />
identified to 68 prey codes. Index of Relative Importance (IRI) has been calculated from these data<br />
<strong>and</strong> diet overlap between fish species is presented. Second, stable isotope <strong>and</strong> elemental<br />
composition analysis of samples were carried out for carbon <strong>and</strong> nitrogen. In total, nearly 2000<br />
samples were analysed. Samples include:<br />
• Fish (N=662 muscle, N=377 liver samples, 22 species);<br />
• Cephalopods (N=193);<br />
• Pelagic invertebrates (N=407);<br />
• Benthic sediments (N=36);<br />
• Phytoplankton (N=92);<br />
• Benthic invertebrates (N=200 completed, 95 pending analysis);<br />
Results have already been used to assist in parameterising <strong>and</strong> validating the quantitative model of<br />
the food web of the Ross Sea (paper accepted by CCAMLR Science). Research on the shrinkage of<br />
Antarctic silverfish carried out as part of this objective has contributed to a paper presented to the<br />
Ministry of Fisheries Antarctic Fisheries Working Group <strong>and</strong> accepted for submission to the<br />
CCAMLR working group on fisheries assessment in September 2010 (Pinkerton et al. 2007,<br />
2009a, 2009b).<br />
Specific Objective 11: Assess molecular taxonomy <strong>and</strong> population genetics of selected Antarctic<br />
fauna <strong>and</strong> flora to estimate evolutionary divergence within <strong>and</strong> among ocean basins in circumpolar<br />
species. Provide DNA barcoding for all fish <strong>and</strong> multi-cellular invertebrate species by sequencing<br />
reference specimens in conjunction with Canadian Barcoding Centre, for specimen identification<br />
in gut content, plankton, <strong>and</strong> in taxonomic <strong>and</strong> population genetic projects.<br />
DNA data sets generated for selected Ross Sea taxa were combined with parallel data sets<br />
generated by other Institutes in order to estimate divergence within <strong>and</strong> among regions in the<br />
Southern Ocean. High levels of divergence, indicative of cryptic speciation, were found in all<br />
279