25.10.2013 Views

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Marine <strong>Biodiversity</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> the highest δ 13 C values at the coastal sites (e.g. Leigh, Tawharanui <strong>and</strong> Kawau). Without<br />

direct modelling of end point source signatures we cannot definitively determine the percentage<br />

contribution of each carbon source. However, we suggest that the depleted δ 13 C of taxa from<br />

offshore sites is the result of a pelagic source of C <strong>and</strong> the enriched δ 13 C at coastal sites is the<br />

result of a more benthic input of C than at offshore sites, with sources including kelp detritus.<br />

Taxa at the inner gulf sites are also likely to be subjected to a proportion of benthicaly-derived<br />

enriched δ 13 C. There were no obvious effects of marine reserve status on the isotopic signatures<br />

of study taxa with the exception of slightly enriched δ 13 C of kina <strong>and</strong> snapper at Leigh, <strong>and</strong> of<br />

kina at Tawharanui.<br />

Otolith microchemistry results for parore <strong>and</strong> snapper indicate strong connectivity between reef<br />

<strong>and</strong> non-reef systems within the wider Hauraki Gulf ecosystem. The majority of fishes<br />

sampled (both species) were likely to have originated as juveniles from lower salinity water<br />

environments such as estuaries fringing the Gulf. For snapper, our data suggest that only a<br />

small percentage of juveniles derive from reefs themselves. However, greater sampling<br />

replication is now required across a range of reef sites to better define the ratio of reef- versus<br />

estuary-derived juveniles, given the low percentage of reef-derived snapper.<br />

A qualitative model of northeast New Zeal<strong>and</strong> rocky reef ecosystems was developed to explore<br />

the complexity of interactions amongst New Zeal<strong>and</strong> rocky reef species <strong>and</strong> the impacts of<br />

exploitation. This model was developed on the basis of a review <strong>and</strong> summary of interactions<br />

among reef components. A key modelling outcome was the highly predictive but opposite<br />

responses by small lobsters <strong>and</strong> large predatory invertebrates to changes in the abundance of a<br />

range of other groups. This suggests that these two groups are ideal c<strong>and</strong>idates as variables for<br />

monitoring reef ecosystem responses to perturbations. The modelling agreed with a well<br />

documented example of responses to a perturbation in fishing pressure in the Leigh Marine<br />

Reserve. However, the predictability was low for all responses. This implies, for example, that<br />

the reduction of kina in the Leigh Marine Reserve <strong>and</strong> the subsequent increase in macro-algae<br />

consequent to an increase in lobster abundance may not necessarily occur in another area.<br />

Field sampling at ten rocky reef sites across the Hauraki Gulf revealed differences among sites<br />

in community structure of macroalgae <strong>and</strong> invertebrates within all habitat strata. Of the<br />

environmental factors available, depth followed by a measure of water clarity (mean secchi)<br />

explained the most variation in the dependent variables (invertebrate taxa) from the quadrat<br />

data. Fish abundance data showed a similar, though weaker, trend across sites with depth,<br />

distance across the Gulf, <strong>and</strong> water clarity being the most important factors. The strong<br />

association between depth <strong>and</strong> water clarity <strong>and</strong> abundances of key taxa was expected <strong>and</strong> is<br />

similar to that found in earlier studies. With the exception of crayfish, there was no apparent<br />

overall relationship between invertebrate <strong>and</strong> fish abundances <strong>and</strong> marine reserve status of<br />

study sites, though the baited underwater video data showed snapper to be significantly larger<br />

within marine reserve sites than at fished sites.<br />

Stable isotope analysis of tissue samples collected from key species from all study sites allowed<br />

insight into the functional relationships among species as well as dietary sources of carbon.<br />

Many of the study taxa, from the primary producers through to the predators, had the most<br />

depleted δ 13 C values at the furthest inshore <strong>and</strong> offshore sites (e.g. Poor Knights <strong>and</strong> Long Bay)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the highest δ 13 C values at the coastal sites (e.g. Leigh, Tawharanui <strong>and</strong> Kawau). Without<br />

direct modelling of end point source signatures we cannot definitively determine the percentage<br />

contribution of each carbon source. However, we suggest that the depleted δ 13 C of taxa from<br />

offshore sites is the result of a pelagic source of C <strong>and</strong> the enriched δ 13 C at coastal sites is the<br />

result of a more benthic input of C than at offshore sites, with sources including kelp detritus.<br />

Taxa at the inner gulf sites are also likely to be subjected to a proportion of benthicaly-derived<br />

enriched δ 13 C. There were no obvious effects of marine reserve status on the isotopic signatures<br />

of study taxa with the exception of slightly enriched δ 13 C of kina <strong>and</strong> snapper at Leigh, <strong>and</strong> of<br />

kina at Tawharanui.<br />

262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!