25.10.2013 Views

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Marine <strong>Biodiversity</strong><br />

among distinct species, providing new insight into the genetic structure of marine diversity. With the<br />

genetic analysis often called barcoding, the Census sometimes decreased diversity but generally its<br />

analyses exp<strong>and</strong>ed the number of species, especially the number of different microbes, including<br />

bacteria <strong>and</strong> archaea.<br />

The Census has overwhelmingly demonstrated that the total number of species in the ocean remain<br />

largely unknown. The Census also demonstrated that evidence of human impacts on the oceans<br />

extends to all depths <strong>and</strong> habitats <strong>and</strong> that we still have much to learn to integrate use of resources<br />

with stewardship of a healthy marine ecosystem. The Census results could logically extrapolate to at<br />

least a million kinds of eukaryotic marine life that earn the rank of species <strong>and</strong> to tens or even<br />

hundreds of millions of kinds of microbes.<br />

A summary of the overall state of knowledge about marine biodiversity after the Census by Costello<br />

et al. (2010) places New Zeal<strong>and</strong> 6 th out of 18 national regions based on the collective knowledge<br />

assembled by the Census National <strong>and</strong> Regional Implementation Committees (NRIC) <strong>and</strong> comparing<br />

the Spearman rank correlation coefficients between known diversity (total species richness, alien<br />

species, <strong>and</strong> endemics) <strong>and</strong> available resources, such as numbers of taxonomic guides <strong>and</strong> experts.<br />

(Figure 11.2).<br />

Figure 11.2: The regions are ranked by their state-of-knowledge index (mean ± st<strong>and</strong>ard error) across taxa. Dashed<br />

line represents the overall mean. (Image Source Costello et al. 2010).<br />

All NRICs reported what they considered the main threats to marine biodiversity in their region,<br />

citing published data <strong>and</strong> expert opinions. Although the reports were not st<strong>and</strong>ardised, the threats<br />

identified were grouped into several overarching issues. We integrated these data on biodiversity<br />

threats so as to rank each threat from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high threat) in each region. New Zeal<strong>and</strong><br />

was placed 12 th out of 1 8 regions in terms of overall threat levels to biodiversity, overfishing <strong>and</strong><br />

alien species invasion. Habitat loss <strong>and</strong> ocean acidification were identified as the biggest threats to<br />

marine biodiversity in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (Costello et al. 2010).<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!