25.10.2013 Views

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Non-protected bycatch<br />

6.3.9. Tuna longline fishery<br />

The New Zeal<strong>and</strong> tuna longline fishery was dominated by the foreign licensed vessels during the<br />

1980s, but is now comprised of chartered Japanese vessels <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> domestic vessels. The<br />

domestic fishing fleet has been the dominant fleet in the fishery since 1993–94 (Figure 6.20).<br />

Number of hooks (millions)<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

0.0<br />

1979-80<br />

1980-81<br />

1981-82<br />

1982-83<br />

1983-84<br />

1984-85<br />

1985-86<br />

1986-87<br />

1987-88<br />

1988-89<br />

1989-90<br />

1990-91<br />

1991-92<br />

1992-93<br />

1993-94<br />

1994-95<br />

1995-96<br />

1996-97<br />

Fishing year<br />

1997-98<br />

1998-99<br />

1999-00<br />

2000-01<br />

2001-02<br />

2002-03<br />

N.Z. Domestic<br />

Foreign + charter<br />

2003-04<br />

2004-05<br />

2005-06<br />

2006-07<br />

2007-08<br />

2008-09<br />

Figure 6.20: Effort (hooks set) in the tuna longline fishery. Black bars are Foreign <strong>and</strong> Charter vessels,<br />

white bars are NZ domestic vessels.<br />

The Japanese charter fleet mainly target southern bluefin tuna off the west coast South isl<strong>and</strong> (WCSI),<br />

<strong>and</strong> domestic vessels target mainly southern bluefin tuna <strong>and</strong> bigeye tuna <strong>and</strong> the fishery is<br />

concentrated on the east coast of the North Isl<strong>and</strong> (ECNI) with some fishing for southern Bluefin tuna<br />

on the WCSI.<br />

The most recent analysis of fish bycatch in tuna longline fisheries was the 2006−07 to 2009−10<br />

fishing years (Griggs & Baird 1012)<br />

Observer effort has mainly focused on the Japanese charter vessels (all vessels covered <strong>and</strong> usually<br />

about 80% of hooks observed), with lower coverage of the domestic fishery (approximately 7-8%<br />

during 2006−07 to 2009−10). Most of the fishing effort is carried out by the domestic fleet so this<br />

fleet is under-observed.<br />

During 2006−07 to 2009–10, 111 074 fish <strong>and</strong> invertebrates from at least 62 species or species groups<br />

were observed. Most species were rarely observed, with only 37 species (or species groups) exceeding<br />

100 observations between 1988–89 <strong>and</strong> 2009–10. The most commonly observed species over all years<br />

were blue shark, albacore tuna, <strong>and</strong> Ray’s bream, these three making up nearly 70% of the catch by<br />

numbers. Blue shark <strong>and</strong> Ray’s bream were the most abundant <strong>and</strong> second most abundant species in<br />

each of the four fishing years 2006–07 to 2009−10 (Table 6.2). Other important non-target species<br />

were albacore, lancetfish, bigscale pomfret, dealfish, porbeagle shark, swordfish, moonfish, mako<br />

shark, deepwater dogfish, sunfish, <strong>and</strong> oilfish. The catch composition varied with fleet <strong>and</strong> area<br />

fished.<br />

QMS bycatch species are blue sharks, mako sharks, porbeagle sharks, school shark, moonfish, Ray’s<br />

bream, <strong>and</strong> swordfish. Swordfish is also sometimes targeted.<br />

152<br />

2009-10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!