25.10.2013 Views

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Annual Review 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AEBAR <strong>2012</strong>: Non-protected bycatch<br />

Figure 6.6: <strong>Annual</strong> estimates of fish discards in the target ling longline fishery, calculated for ling (LIN),<br />

commercial (QMS) species (COM), non-commercial (non-QMS) species (OTH), <strong>and</strong> overall (TOT) for the<br />

years 1994–95 <strong>and</strong> 1998–99 to 2005–06 (in black). Also shown (in grey) are estimates of the ling <strong>and</strong> total<br />

discards calculated for 1990–91 to 1997–98 by Anderson et al. (2000). Error bars show the 95%<br />

confidence intervals.<br />

6.3.3. Hoki/hake/ling trawl fishery<br />

Earlier reports were limited to the hoki target fishery <strong>and</strong> only the most recent report considers<br />

bycatch <strong>and</strong> discards for the fishery as defined by the three target species combined—but hoki is<br />

dominant in this fishery, accounting for over 90% of the catch.<br />

Observer coverage in the hoki, hake, <strong>and</strong> ling trawl fishery between 2000–01 <strong>and</strong> 2006–07 ranged<br />

from 11% to 21% of the annual target fishery catch, <strong>and</strong> 78 separate vessels were observed, covering<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!