zasady wyk£adni prawa podatkowego w krajach ... - Gandalf
zasady wyk£adni prawa podatkowego w krajach ... - Gandalf zasady wyk£adni prawa podatkowego w krajach ... - Gandalf
Wykaz literatury Miller G., Pragmatics and the Maxims of Interpretation, Wisconsin Law Review 1990, XXX Miller J., Inderetminacy, Complexity, and Fairness: Justyfying Rule Simplification in The Law of Taxation, Washington Law Review, January 1993 Nikitman J., Alty D., Some Thoughts on Statutory Interpretation in Canadian Tax Law: A Reply to Brian Arnold, Report of Proceedings Fifty-second Tax Conference, Canadian Tax Foundation, Toronto 2000 O’Connor G., Restatement (First) of Statutory Interpretation, 7 New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 2003-20004 Pear R., With Rights Act Comes Fight to Clarify Congress’s Intent, New York Times z 18 listopada 1991 Pearce D., Geddes R., Statutory Interpretation in Australia, Butterworths 1996 Popkin W., Judicial Anti-Tax Avoidance Doctrine in England: A United States Perspective, British Tax Review 1991/ 8 Posner A., Legislation and Its Interpretation: A Primer, 68 Nebrasca Law Review 1989 Posner R., Statutory Interpretation – In the Classroom and in the Courtroom, 50 University of Chicago Law Review 1983 Poster M., Interpreting Texts: Some New Directions, 58 Southern California Law Review, January 1985 Pugh R., USA: National Report, The Interpretation of Tax Laws with Special Reference to Form and Substance. Studies on International Fiscal Law, Vol. La, London 1965 Radin M., Statutory Interpretation, 43 Harvard Law Review 1930 Redish M., Federal Common Law, Political Legitimacy and the Interpretive Process: An “Institutionalist” Perspective, 83 New Wales University Law Review 1989 Redish M.., Chung T., Democratic Theory and the Legislative Process: Mourning the Death of Originalism in Statutory Interpretation, Tulane Law Review, March 1994 Richardson J., Canada: National Report, The Interpretation of Tax Laws with Special Reference to Form and Substance. Studies on International Fiscal Law, Vol. La, London 1965 Rosenkranz N., Federal Rules of Statutory Interpretation, 115 Harvard Law Review 2002 Rosmarin S., Prawo podatkowe a prawo prywatne w świetle wykładni prawa, Lwów 1939 Scalia A., Common-Law Courts in Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting Constitution and Laws, [w:] A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, Any Guttman ed. 1997 XV
Scalia A., Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretation of Law, 1989 Duke Law Journal, June 1989 Schacter J., The Confounding Common-Law Originalism in Recent Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation: Implication for the Legislative History Debate and Beyond, 51 Stanford Law Review 1998 Schneider D., Empirical Research on Judicial Reasoning: Statutory Interpretation in Federal Tax Cases, 31 New Mexico Law Review 2001 Shaviro D., Beyond Public Choice and Public Interest: A Study of the Legislative Process as Illustrated by Tax Legislation in the 1980s’ 139 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1990 Sherbaniuk D., Tax Avoidance – Recent Developements [w:] Report of Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Tax Conference, 1968 Conference Report, Toronto, Canadian Tax Foundation 1969 Shipwright A., Keeling E., Textbook on Revenue Law, Blackstone 1995 Singer Norman J. – Statutes and Statutory Construction 2002, 6. wyd. Slater A., Sham and Substance, 28 Australian Tax Review (1999) Slawson W., Legislative History and the Need to Bring Statutory Interpretation Under the Rule of Law, 44 Stanford Law Review 1992 Smith T., Interpreting the Internal Revenue Code: A Tax Jurisprudence, 72 Taxes 1994 Starr K., Observations About the Use of Legislative History, 36 Duke Law Journal, No. 3 Stevens J., The Shakespeare Canon of Statutory Construction, 140 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1992 Sullivan R., Driedger on the Construction of Statutes, Markham 1994, Butterworths Sunstein C., Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State, 103 Harvard Law Review 1989 Sunstein C., Vermuele A., Interpretation and Institutions, 101 Michigan Law Review 2003 Szyszkowski W., Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych, Warszawa 1969, Tax Review 1987, Nr 6 Tiley J., Anti-Avoidance Doctrine: The US Alternatives – Part II, British Tiley J., The Law of Taxation in a European Environment [1991] Cambridge Law Review Tiley J., Revenue Law, Hart Publishing (5th ed.) 2005 VanderWolk J., Purposive Interpretation of Tax Statutes: Recent UK Decisions on Tax Avoidance Transaction, Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation 2002, No. 2 Vermuele A., Legislative History and the Limits of Judicial Competence: The Untold Story of Holy Trinity Church, 50 Stanford Law Review 1998 XVI Wykaz literatury
- Page 3 and 4: Polecamy nasze publikacje z zakresu
- Page 5 and 6: Redakcja: Adrianna Kocewiak-Górska
- Page 7 and 8: 3.6.3. Dyrektywa dążenia do reali
- Page 10 and 11: 1. Publikacje Wykaz skrótów Abb.
- Page 12 and 13: Wykaz literatury Alexander L., Prak
- Page 14 and 15: Wykaz literatury Dyson J., Interpre
- Page 18: Wykaz literatury Wald P., Some Obse
Wykaz literatury<br />
Miller G., Pragmatics and the Maxims of Interpretation, Wisconsin Law Review<br />
1990, XXX<br />
Miller J., Inderetminacy, Complexity, and Fairness: Justyfying Rule Simplification<br />
in The Law of Taxation, Washington Law Review, January 1993<br />
Nikitman J., Alty D., Some Thoughts on Statutory Interpretation in Canadian<br />
Tax Law: A Reply to Brian Arnold, Report of Proceedings Fifty-second Tax<br />
Conference, Canadian Tax Foundation, Toronto 2000<br />
O’Connor G., Restatement (First) of Statutory Interpretation, 7 New York<br />
University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 2003-20004<br />
Pear R., With Rights Act Comes Fight to Clarify Congress’s Intent, New York<br />
Times z 18 listopada 1991<br />
Pearce D., Geddes R., Statutory Interpretation in Australia, Butterworths<br />
1996<br />
Popkin W., Judicial Anti-Tax Avoidance Doctrine in England: A United States<br />
Perspective, British Tax Review 1991/ 8<br />
Posner A., Legislation and Its Interpretation: A Primer, 68 Nebrasca Law Review<br />
1989<br />
Posner R., Statutory Interpretation – In the Classroom and in the Courtroom,<br />
50 University of Chicago Law Review 1983<br />
Poster M., Interpreting Texts: Some New Directions, 58 Southern California<br />
Law Review, January 1985<br />
Pugh R., USA: National Report, The Interpretation of Tax Laws with Special<br />
Reference to Form and Substance. Studies on International Fiscal Law, Vol.<br />
La, London 1965<br />
Radin M., Statutory Interpretation, 43 Harvard Law Review 1930<br />
Redish M., Federal Common Law, Political Legitimacy and the Interpretive<br />
Process: An “Institutionalist” Perspective, 83 New Wales University Law<br />
Review 1989<br />
Redish M.., Chung T., Democratic Theory and the Legislative Process: Mourning<br />
the Death of Originalism in Statutory Interpretation, Tulane Law Review,<br />
March 1994<br />
Richardson J., Canada: National Report, The Interpretation of Tax Laws with<br />
Special Reference to Form and Substance. Studies on International Fiscal<br />
Law, Vol. La, London 1965<br />
Rosenkranz N., Federal Rules of Statutory Interpretation, 115 Harvard Law<br />
Review 2002<br />
Rosmarin S., Prawo podatkowe a prawo prywatne w świetle wykładni <strong>prawa</strong>,<br />
Lwów 1939<br />
Scalia A., Common-Law Courts in Civil-Law System: The Role of United<br />
States Federal Courts in Interpreting Constitution and Laws, [w:]<br />
A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, Any Guttman ed.<br />
1997<br />
XV
Change language