25.10.2013 Views

Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund

Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund

Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the co-existence of diverse cultures <strong>and</strong> ethnic groups within one national territory, not in any<br />

order of preference or importance. However, as the author highlights:<br />

“The influence of multiculturalism is not only present in the protection of the cultural<br />

manifestations <strong>and</strong> creations of the diverse social <strong>and</strong> ethnic groups that make up<br />

Brazilian society, but also permeates the constituent legislator’s attempts to secure<br />

special territorial <strong>and</strong> cultural rights to indigenous peoples <strong>and</strong> quilombolas (...) it<br />

is useless to protect quilombola <strong>and</strong> indigenous cultural manifestations without<br />

securing the conditions for their physical <strong>and</strong> cultural survival.” 19<br />

According to the Brazilian Federal Constitution, indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s are recognized as l<strong>and</strong>s<br />

that “are inhabited by indigenous peoples on a permanent basis, are utilized for their productive<br />

activities, are indispensable for preserving the environmental resources necessary to their wellbeing<br />

<strong>and</strong> to their physical <strong>and</strong> cultural reproduction, according to their uses, customs, <strong>and</strong><br />

traditions” (Art. 231, §1). The Brazilian Constitution recognizes a direct relationship between the<br />

security of territorial rights <strong>and</strong> the physical <strong>and</strong> cultural survival of indigenous peoples, with the<br />

right to l<strong>and</strong> being a necessary condition for maintaining their uses, customs <strong>and</strong> traditions, or<br />

in other words, their existence as ethnic groups that are culturally differentiated from the rest of<br />

the population. In this case, the Supreme Court (STF) Justice Celso de Mello highlights the legal<br />

relevance of recognizing indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s in Brazil:<br />

“The legal importance of this official recognition (of indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s) – which is<br />

rendered in the presidential decree of administrative ratification of the demarcated<br />

area in question – lies in the fact that l<strong>and</strong>s traditionally occupied by indians,<br />

although they are part of the Union’s patrimony (FC, Art. 20, XI), are found to be<br />

affected, as a result of constitutional application, for specific ends uniquely aimed<br />

at the legal, social, anthropological, economic <strong>and</strong> cultural protection of indians,<br />

to protect them (which foresees the removal <strong>and</strong> indemnization of non-indigenous occupants, the fiscalization<br />

of frontiers <strong>and</strong> the administrative registration of invaders). These activities are regulated by the Indian Statute<br />

(Federal Law 6001/73). Article 26(1) of the UN Declaration on the Rights of <strong>Indigenous</strong> Peoples recognizes that<br />

“<strong>Indigenous</strong> Peoples have the right to l<strong>and</strong>s, territories <strong>and</strong> resources they traditionally possess <strong>and</strong> occupy or<br />

have by other means utilized or acquired.”<br />

19 SANTILLI, Juliana. Socioambientalismo e novos direitos (Socio-environmentalism <strong>and</strong> new rights). São Paulo,<br />

Peirópolis, 2005, pp.79/80.<br />

82 Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!