25.10.2013 Views

Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund

Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund

Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esources in l<strong>and</strong>s to which they have the title, except for areas that are explicitly reserved<br />

by the State or that have exclusive rights for excluding third parties.” 111 At the same time,<br />

the forestry law specifically prohibits granting concessions to third parties in native or rural<br />

community l<strong>and</strong>s; 112 this allows for the interpretation that indigenous people have the right of<br />

exclusive use over forest resources on their l<strong>and</strong>s, which would be of more consequence with<br />

the current international norms in Peru; however, the current legislation in Peru leaves room for<br />

many contradictory interpretations.<br />

However, since the indigenous people directly exploit forest resources-- according to the<br />

Article 43 of the forestry law of 2001 <strong>and</strong> Article 11 of law decree 22175 of 1978 which indicate<br />

that the legal regime that applies to native forest logging is the same forestry law <strong>and</strong> not<br />

special rules regarding indigenous people --, it is possible to affirm that forest harvesting by<br />

native communities is subject to the elaboration <strong>and</strong> approval of forest management plans.<br />

These plans should be subject to approval by the appropriate authority, <strong>and</strong> the request<br />

to carry out forest management should be accompanied by “a certified copy of a community<br />

certificate where they agree to carry out said harvest.” 113 These rules do not distinguish traditional<br />

use activities from forest harvesting. Still, the dem<strong>and</strong> such a community agreement for carrying<br />

out the said harvesting is noteworthy, as it is a legal requirement, in the studied legislations, that<br />

only exists in Peru.<br />

Overlap between NPA <strong>and</strong> Native Community L<strong>and</strong>s<br />

The law is ambiguous regarding the restriction of rights of use <strong>and</strong> enjoyment of natural<br />

resources <strong>and</strong> also about the existence of the overlap between protected areas <strong>and</strong> native<br />

community l<strong>and</strong>s. Legislation appears to favor environmental regulations over indigenous<br />

people’s special rights of ownership <strong>and</strong> use of natural resources.<br />

On one h<strong>and</strong>, Article 54 of the Environmental Code (Legislative Decree Nº 613/1990)<br />

establishes that the Peruvian State recognizes native <strong>and</strong> rural communities’ ownership rights of<br />

111 Law 26821 of June 10, 1997. Article 18.<br />

112 Supreme Decree 014-2001-AG of August 4, 2001. Article 43. – Forests in native <strong>and</strong> rural community l<strong>and</strong>s are<br />

those located within territory that belongs to native <strong>and</strong> rural communities. Their use is subject to the provisions<br />

of the law <strong>and</strong> present regulations. Forest concessions are not granted to third parties in native or rural communities.<br />

(Emphasis by author)<br />

113 Law 27308, Forestry Law of Wild Fauna. Article 12 <strong>and</strong> Article 149 of the Supreme Decree 014-2001-AG of<br />

August 4, 2001.<br />

Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!