Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
y the new Constitutional Court through declaring the validity of norms preceding the new<br />
Constitution. 91<br />
The same is true with respect to the laws regarding the areas of overlap between<br />
indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> natural protected areas. The law of environmental management, although<br />
prior to the SPC, orders the consultation of the indigenous people who are in conservation unit<br />
areas in order to define the management <strong>and</strong> the applicable regime in said areas. 92 The law does<br />
not mention anything about its administration or the extent of indigenous participation in the<br />
decisions referring to the compliance with environmental objectives. However, due to the current<br />
indigenous legislation in Ecuador, the applicable norms in these situations should be compatible<br />
with the recognition of full rights over the territory <strong>and</strong> the natural resources of article 57 of the<br />
EPC of 2008.<br />
One point that continues to be controversial <strong>and</strong> ambiguous in the Ecuadorian<br />
indigenous legislation refers to the legal effects of the right to consultation <strong>and</strong> free, prior <strong>and</strong><br />
formed consent of indigenous people. Article 57.7 of the SPC observes that in the case of not<br />
obtaining the consent of the consulted community, it will proceed according to the Constitution<br />
<strong>and</strong> the law.<br />
Based on the previous statement, part of the Ecuadorian doctrine interprets that, as<br />
there is no current applicable law, <strong>and</strong> since the Constitution itself, in the title of Article 57 points<br />
to the rights of the indigenous people, it should be interpreted in accordance with the pacts,<br />
agreements, declarations <strong>and</strong> other international instruments for human rights. It is only possible<br />
to underst<strong>and</strong> Article 57.7 in the terms of the right to free, prior <strong>and</strong> informed consent. That is to<br />
say, §7 of Article 57 should be harmonized with Articles 19 <strong>and</strong> 32 of the UNDRIP, which guarantee<br />
the right to free, prior <strong>and</strong> informed consent of the indigenous people regarding any legislative<br />
or administrative measure capable of affecting them. For now, this is a possible interpretation of<br />
public utility. These l<strong>and</strong>s will be exempt from the payment of property tax.” (Emphasis by author). The content of<br />
the cited articles is different from the equivalent text in the SPC of 2008 for the phrases highlighted in red, which,<br />
evidently, were repealed in the current legal order of Ecuador.<br />
91 http://www.tribunalconstitucional.gov.ec/<br />
92 Law of Environmental Management, 2004-019. Art. 13. – The provincial councils <strong>and</strong> municipalities will dictate<br />
sectional environmental policy subject to the Political Constitution of the Republic <strong>and</strong> the present Law. They will<br />
respect the national regulations regarding the Patrimony of Natural Protected Areas to determine l<strong>and</strong> use <strong>and</strong><br />
will consult the representatives of indigenous people, Afro-Ecuadorians <strong>and</strong> local populations for the delimitation,<br />
management <strong>and</strong> administration of conservation <strong>and</strong> ecological reserve areas.<br />
Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t 53