Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund

Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund

forest.trends.org
from forest.trends.org More from this publisher
25.10.2013 Views

One of these bills relates to the expedition of the Environmental and Water Code 85 which is currently under discussion and has provoked controversy regarding its constitutionality, both in its reference to the rights recognized by indigenous people, 86 as well as the same environmental protection principle that was incorporated in the 2008 Constitution. 87 The current legislation, the law of Forestry and Conservation of Protected Areas and Wildlife of 2004, guarantees that the forest areas in indigenous territories are exploited exclusively by the indigenous people who own them, on authorization by the Ministry of the Environment. 88 This same law points out that indigenous people have the exclusive right to use of forest resources other than wood and the wildlife in their lands of their domain or position. Article 39 of the forestry law states that the exclusive right of forest resource use belongs to indigenous people and should be understood according to Articles 83 and 84 of the PC of 1998. 89 It is important to highlight that in the previous Political Constitution, the right to inalienable, unseizable and imprescriptible collective property of indigenous territories was already guaranteed, the reason for which was that the mentioned provisions could be considered compatible with the principles of the new constitution, 90 however, this should be confirmed 85 See the text of the bill in: http://www.asambleanacional.gov.ec/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_vie w&gid=935&dir=DESC&order=date&Itemid=188&limit=10&limitstart=10. 86 To see a complete analysis of how the mentioned bill limits the reach of indigenous people, see: http://clavero. derechosindigenas.org/?p=1705. 87 See criticism regarding the content of the bill for limiting indigenous rights and defining the State as exclusive owner of any ecosystem service produced in Ecuadorian territory in: http://www.accionecologica.org/index. php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1146&Itemid=1 88 Art. 37 – Except for the provisions in the present chapter, the productive forest areas of the State that are found in community lands of the indigenous, black or Afro-Ecuadorian people, which will be exclusively used by them, upon authorization of the Ministry of the Environment subject to what is laid out in this law. (Forestry and Conservation of Natural Areas and Wildlife Law. Codification 17, Official Registration Supplement 418 of September 10, 2004). (Emphasis by author.) 89 Art 39 – Indigenous, black or Afro-Ecuadorian communities have the exclusive right to the use of forest products other than the wood and the wildlife in the lands of their domain or possession, in agreement with Articles 83 and 84 of the Political Constitution of the Republic. (Forestry and Conservation of Natural Areas and Wildlife Law. Codification 17, Official Registration Supplement 418 of September 10, 2004). (Emphasis by author.) 90 SPC 1998. Art. 83 – Indigenous people who self-define as nationalities with ancestral roots, and the black or Afro-Ecuadorian people form part of the Ecuadorian State, unique and indivisible. Art. 84. The State will recognize and guarantee to the indigenous people, in accordance with this Constitution and the law, respect for the public order and human rights and the following collective rights: (…) 2. Conserve the imprescriptible property of the community lands which will be inalienable, unseizable and indivisible, except the power of the State to declare its 52 Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t

y the new Constitutional Court through declaring the validity of norms preceding the new Constitution. 91 The same is true with respect to the laws regarding the areas of overlap between indigenous lands and natural protected areas. The law of environmental management, although prior to the SPC, orders the consultation of the indigenous people who are in conservation unit areas in order to define the management and the applicable regime in said areas. 92 The law does not mention anything about its administration or the extent of indigenous participation in the decisions referring to the compliance with environmental objectives. However, due to the current indigenous legislation in Ecuador, the applicable norms in these situations should be compatible with the recognition of full rights over the territory and the natural resources of article 57 of the EPC of 2008. One point that continues to be controversial and ambiguous in the Ecuadorian indigenous legislation refers to the legal effects of the right to consultation and free, prior and formed consent of indigenous people. Article 57.7 of the SPC observes that in the case of not obtaining the consent of the consulted community, it will proceed according to the Constitution and the law. Based on the previous statement, part of the Ecuadorian doctrine interprets that, as there is no current applicable law, and since the Constitution itself, in the title of Article 57 points to the rights of the indigenous people, it should be interpreted in accordance with the pacts, agreements, declarations and other international instruments for human rights. It is only possible to understand Article 57.7 in the terms of the right to free, prior and informed consent. That is to say, §7 of Article 57 should be harmonized with Articles 19 and 32 of the UNDRIP, which guarantee the right to free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous people regarding any legislative or administrative measure capable of affecting them. For now, this is a possible interpretation of public utility. These lands will be exempt from the payment of property tax.” (Emphasis by author). The content of the cited articles is different from the equivalent text in the SPC of 2008 for the phrases highlighted in red, which, evidently, were repealed in the current legal order of Ecuador. 91 http://www.tribunalconstitucional.gov.ec/ 92 Law of Environmental Management, 2004-019. Art. 13. – The provincial councils and municipalities will dictate sectional environmental policy subject to the Political Constitution of the Republic and the present Law. They will respect the national regulations regarding the Patrimony of Natural Protected Areas to determine land use and will consult the representatives of indigenous people, Afro-Ecuadorians and local populations for the delimitation, management and administration of conservation and ecological reserve areas. Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t 53

One of these bills relates to the expedition of the Environmental <strong>and</strong> Water Code 85 which<br />

is currently under discussion <strong>and</strong> has provoked controversy regarding its constitutionality, both in<br />

its reference to the rights recognized by indigenous people, 86 as well as the same environmental<br />

protection principle that was incorporated in the 2008 Constitution. 87<br />

The current legislation, the law of Forestry <strong>and</strong> Conservation of Protected Areas<br />

<strong>and</strong> Wildlife of 2004, guarantees that the forest areas in indigenous territories are exploited<br />

exclusively by the indigenous people who own them, on authorization by the Ministry of the<br />

Environment. 88 This same law points out that indigenous people have the exclusive right to<br />

use of forest resources other than wood <strong>and</strong> the wildlife in their l<strong>and</strong>s of their domain or<br />

position.<br />

Article 39 of the forestry law states that the exclusive right of forest resource use<br />

belongs to indigenous people <strong>and</strong> should be understood according to Articles 83 <strong>and</strong> 84 of<br />

the PC of 1998. 89 It is important to highlight that in the previous Political Constitution, the right<br />

to inalienable, unseizable <strong>and</strong> imprescriptible collective property of indigenous territories was<br />

already guaranteed, the reason for which was that the mentioned provisions could be considered<br />

compatible with the principles of the new constitution, 90 however, this should be confirmed<br />

85 See the text of the bill in: http://www.asambleanacional.gov.ec/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_vie<br />

w&gid=935&dir=DESC&order=date&Itemid=188&limit=10&limitstart=10.<br />

86 To see a complete analysis of how the mentioned bill limits the reach of indigenous people, see: http://clavero.<br />

derechosindigenas.org/?p=1705.<br />

87 See criticism regarding the content of the bill for limiting indigenous rights <strong>and</strong> defining the State as exclusive<br />

owner of any ecosystem service produced in Ecuadorian territory in: http://www.accionecologica.org/index.<br />

php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1146&Itemid=1<br />

88 Art. 37 – Except for the provisions in the present chapter, the productive forest areas of the State that are<br />

found in community l<strong>and</strong>s of the indigenous, black or Afro-Ecuadorian people, which will be exclusively used<br />

by them, upon authorization of the Ministry of the Environment subject to what is laid out in this law. (Forestry<br />

<strong>and</strong> Conservation of Natural Areas <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Law. Codification 17, Official Registration Supplement 418 of<br />

September 10, 2004). (Emphasis by author.)<br />

89 Art 39 – <strong>Indigenous</strong>, black or Afro-Ecuadorian communities have the exclusive right to the use of forest products<br />

other than the wood <strong>and</strong> the wildlife in the l<strong>and</strong>s of their domain or possession, in agreement with Articles 83 <strong>and</strong><br />

84 of the Political Constitution of the Republic. (Forestry <strong>and</strong> Conservation of Natural Areas <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Law.<br />

Codification 17, Official Registration Supplement 418 of September 10, 2004). (Emphasis by author.)<br />

90 SPC 1998. Art. 83 – <strong>Indigenous</strong> people who self-define as nationalities with ancestral roots, <strong>and</strong> the black or<br />

Afro-Ecuadorian people form part of the Ecuadorian State, unique <strong>and</strong> indivisible. Art. 84. The State will recognize<br />

<strong>and</strong> guarantee to the indigenous people, in accordance with this Constitution <strong>and</strong> the law, respect for the public<br />

order <strong>and</strong> human rights <strong>and</strong> the following collective rights: (…) 2. Conserve the imprescriptible property of the<br />

community l<strong>and</strong>s which will be inalienable, unseizable <strong>and</strong> indivisible, except the power of the State to declare its<br />

52 Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!